• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were the civil wars that followed independence in Angola and Mozambique the result of internal divisions or external interventions?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent were the civil wars that followed independence in Angola and Mozambique the result of internal divisions or external interventions? You should focus your answer on one particular territory but relate this to developments in the other. The wars that followed the independence of both Angola and Mozambique were resultant of internal divisions, but more importantly, they were greatly catalysed by the financial, political, and physical intervention of other nations. It is also generally agreed that the intervention of these countries exacerbated the already volatile situations in Angola and Mozambique, to the extent that had they not intervened as they did, then the resulting economic collapse and massive social unrest that is still prevalent today would not have been so considerable. In this essay, I intend to focus primarily on the situation in Angola, and the range of factors that were instrumental in bringing about such a lengthy and destructive period of violence. The actual 'civil war' in Angola took place in 1975 and 1976, yet the violence still continues to this day. Angola is a country with a vast ethnic wealth. At the latest count there are some 36 or so individual ethnic groups, to which an individual language is assigned, including, of course, the Portuguese language which has been accepted across the nation as the official language. Each of the native languages belongs to a certain area of the country, and it is the distribution of these languages and their cultures that has led to some social tension. ...read more.

Middle

was the most successful of the three. Being based in Luanda it had immediate control of the capital from the outset of independence, and this was to its advantage as its power base there grew quickly and steadily, simultaneously providing easy access to immense wealth from the oil fields, and close links to the sea, from where aid from Cuba and the Soviet Union arrived. The movements' leadership consisted of a group of mesti´┐Żos, and this was representative of its desires for a free, multi-racial Angola. The second movement, UNITA (Uniao Nacional para a Independ´┐Żncia Total de Angola) took perhaps the most interesting course in the events following Angola's independence. Founded in 1966, it was to spearhead the incredible political career of Jonas Savimbi. Despite UNITA's low level of military might, Savimbi's role was vital in securing an underground following of Ovimbundu that was to become a small yet very sharp thorn in the side of the MPLA. He was a very charismatic and ambitious leader and played an essential role in the events that followed. It is suffice to say that Savimbi's very existence was a cause for internal division in the country, from which the subsequent civil war was resultant. It was his hegemony over UNITA, and reluctance to accept a secondary role in the Angolan political history that obstructed the passage to peace. "... The...factional fighting that ensued in 1975 was so chaotic and opportunistic that its exact sequence may remain forever arguable..."2 Savimbi's desire for absolute power led to the 'disappearance' of his internal rivals, ...read more.

Conclusion

Coupled with the changes that were taking place right up until the war, another influencing internal factor was the legacy left by the Portuguese settlers when they fled in 1975. The country was in a state of political turbulence, with many of the policies leading to disappointment when their many pledges remained unfulfilled. The influence of external parties in promoting regional conflict was, however, infinitely more consequential. Vast quantities of aid were received by all of the principal fighting forces, and had this not been the case then Angola's history would not have been so volatile. When comparing the outcomes of post-independence in Angola and Mozambique, we can see that the civil war came to an end in Mozambique and not in Angola essentially due to one major component: money. It was the great wealth that Angola received from its natural resources and from foreign aid that prolonged the conflict there. Mozambique, on the other hand, had limited funding, and a continuation of the costly armed struggle was therefore not a possibility. It is also noteworthy that the internal divisions and personal rivalries in Mozambique were no way as deep-rooted as in Angola. "...In sum, both the Angolans and the Mozambicans did have their own internal reasons for disagreement...However, it is widely agreed that the wars attained their deadly height as a result of external forces that raised destruction to levels far beyond the capacity of the societies to resist. It was above all, the intertwined pacing of apartheid's death struggle and the end-game of the Cold War that determined their rhythm and intensity... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    "he had combined twenty Falangists, eight Carlists, five generals and seventeen from other parties" according to Lee. Therefore, as Lee argues, Franco "was able to bind them together while, at the same time, preventing any of them from becoming too dominant and introducing embarrassingly radical policies.

  2. Could the American War of Independence Have Been Avoided?

    should partly be credited to them as many of their men had fought within their own Militia and also thought that the threat had gone, this led to the feeling that they didn't need the protection that Britain was offering.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Hence, after promising Stalin a second front in August 1942, Roosevelt had to withdraw the pledge and ask for delay of the second front until the spring of 1943. When that date arrived, he was forced to pull back yet again for political and logistical reasons.

  2. To what extent was independence a gift from Britain.

    Both politically and economically Britain was, by 1947, deeply evolved in the Middle East. The oil-rich nature of many of these nations contrasted sharply with lack of Indian productivity for, as Lord Wavell specified, 'India will never, within any time we can foresee, be an efficient country'3.

  1. American History.

    In response to this, a Committee of Correspondence [led by Samuel Adams] was created in Boston to gather publicity for the patriot cause. *1773: The Tea Act and Boston Tea Party* - By 1773 the only Townshend duty still in effect was the tea tax.

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    They were also the most publicised opponent to the Bolsheviks regime during the Russian Civil War; this was due mostly to the Bolsheviks as they wanted to show this perception and traditional soviet or Marxist historians shared this also. "The struggle against the foreign imperialists and the whiteguards lasted for

  1. In both world wars, many enemy aliens were interned in Australia

    of unity propagated during this time was similar to that of the Great War period in an attempt to divert the attention of the populace and mask the divisions of class, age, gender, ethnicity, and race prevalent in Australian society at this time.

  2. Why were there so many civil wars in the 20th century?

    Meanwhile, the government had appointed a Swedish-speaking Finn and former tsarist general, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim (1867-1951), as the commander of its military forces, soon to be called the Whites. Independently of the Reds, Mannerheim also called for military action to begin on the night of January 27, thus causing the civil war to ignite.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work