• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent were the Five-Year Plans of 1928-1941 Intended to Prepare the USSR for War?

Free essay example:

To What Extent were the Five-Year Plans of 1928-1941 Intended to Prepare the USSR for War?

The Five Year Plans were introduced by Stalin to help rapidly industrialise the Soviet Union. It gave the Governement an opportunity to implement economic policies into the country. There were many reasons why the Five-Year Plan was introduced, some of these reasons were intended to prepare the USSR for war, and other reaons had different intentions. The Five Year Plans that were spread over the years 1928-1941 were split into the First Five-Year Plan, the Second Five-Year Plan and the Third Five-Year Plan. Each of these plans dealt with all aspects of development such as consumer goods, industry, transport and communications and welfare, but each plan put emphasis on different areas.

The First Five-Year Plan was introduced in 1928 and lasted until 1932. This plan placed emphasis on the expansion of heavy industry such as coal, steel and iron ore, and was proved successful despite the unrealistic targets that were set. This part of the first plan can be said to have the intention of preparing the USSR for war because heavy industry helps build weapons, means of transport and arms which are all essential when fighting in a war. However, although this part of the plan was a successs, it resulted in many failures within certain sectors in the Soviet Union. An enormous amount of waste was produced and textiles and household goods were neglected. Food rationing and a shortage in fertlisers for agriculture meant that a lot of people suffered. Also, the fact that the Soviet Union tried to be as independent as possible by producing their own food for the country and not being so involved in trading and exporting goods from other countries, the suffering of agriculture proved to be damaging for the USSR preparing for war. This is because the USSR needed a healthy and strong country if they were to be involved in a war, so food levels needed to be high, and the first Five Year Plan did not do much to boost this sector. The Government justified this plan by saying that they needed to help build up industrial areas of the USSR such as factories and communications before other sectors could flourish.

The years 1933-1937 saw the Second Five-Year Plan coming into effect. This plan was a more relaxed version of the fist plan with more organised planning and achievable targets. However, this plan placed alot more emphasis on defence, due to the rise of Hitler and his hatred of communism, so heavy industry continued to receive priority. Also, compared to the first plan, the second plan placed much more emphasis on consumer goods and incentives such as better wages and housing to keep the workers happy. So, this plan prepared the USSR for war better than the first plan in terms of organisation and needs for workers and this plan also placed emphasis on communications and transport. This intended to prepare the USSR for war because it is essential for people fighting in war to communicate with the generals and for them to be transported from place to place to attack the enemy. So, the fact that this grew rapidly during 1933-1937, meant that the second plan prepared the USSR for war to a great extent.

The Third Five-Year Plan came into effect in 1938 and ended in 1941. This plan placed more emphasis on military and defence, and obviously had intentions of preparing for the war. There were more arms production in order to meet the threat from Germany and prepare themselves for war. However, many of the gains of the second plan had been lost and the purges created a shortage of qualified personnel. This meant that the people of Soviet Union fell into repression and discontent as living standards fell, and shortages of oil and other materials began to appear. These effects that the third plan had caused meant that part of this plan did not have the intentions to prepare the Soviet Union for war as unhappy citizens of the USSR may mean opposition to the Government and it's policies, and this may lead to the Government having to put efforts into calming their own country down and dealing with the opposition instead of concentrating on the war. So, even though the main emphasis of the third plan was to prepare the USSR for war, there were many failures that this plan caused, which affected any of those intentions.

Stalin had several reasons to industrialise using the Five Year Plans, as a whole, that were considered as preparing the country for war. Some of these reasons included Stalin wanting to demonstarte how 'Socialism in One Country' works. Stalin believed that the capitalist West opposed countries which were based on communist ideas and believed that Western countries would eventually attack the USSR, therefor Stalin believed that indusrialisation was essential to ensure that the Soviet Union were victorious in any war that may arise. So, industrialistion was seen as patriotic and formed an important part of Stalin's policy of 'Socialism in One Country'. Stalin also wanted to mechanise agriculture and bring about self-sufficient autarky in the USSR. He believed that industrialisation would bring about greater production of food by farming, so would provide the citizens of the Soviet Union with necessities while the country was fighting in a war and could not trade. Stalin also wanted to build up a strong proletariat within the USSR because he knew that if war was declared, the working class would be able to make up a strong army and also while the men were out fghting, the women would still need to be strong and healthy enough to take over certain jobs in factories, mines and shops. So Stalin considered it essential to introduce the Five-Year Plans to prepare the Soviet Union for war.

However, there were many reasons why Stalin wanted to industrialise which had no intentions of preparing the country for war. One of these reasons was for Stalin to be seen as the heir of Lenin. One result of the Five-Year Plan was that it strengthened Stalin's position, as those who opposed to the Five-Year Plans were removed, and this resulted in Stalin exerting greater power and influence as the leader of the Soviet Union. This aim that Stalin wanted to achieve did not have much to do with preparing the USSR for war (although it created a more unified country in some ways) but had more to do with Stalin becoming a greater leader.

In conclusion, the Five Year Plans of 1928-1941 had many intentions, most of which were to prepare the USSR for war, but there were quite a few other reasons about why these plans were introduced. Other reasons included making the USSR a great and powerful country to portray to the rest of the world that Communism is a policy that can be a success, also to strenghten Stalin's power and influence over the Soviet Union.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    This again proves that Source F can be trusted and contains useful information; Haig used 'an appalling strategy' which got thousands killed. Source H praises Haig and calls him 'one of the main architects of the Allied victory'. The general who has written this says, 'Haig's armies, which had complete

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    group of local of local leaders was produced, who spearheaded future change. The reform was achieved with little bloodshed and on the whole benefited the poor. Basically the communist party offered fair taxes, fair distribution of wealth. Mao, in 1953, went on to devise the first five year plan with the help of Russian advisers.

  1. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    Schweizer, a journalist, bases his text on exclusive interviews with key figures within the Reagan administration, mostly composed by intelligence services members as well as administration staff which worked with the president throughout his term (1980-88), and thus were up to date with the American foreign policy of these years.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    One of the senators, Josy Dubie said in Brussels on the day of the assassination that when he asked Hobeika if he felt threatened, he replied: "I feel threatened. I have revelations to make." The senator also said, "I then asked why he did not make these revelations now and

  1. Why was it Stalin that won the leadership struggle by 1928 in the USSR?

    Lenin pre-1917, and in retaliation, Trotsky criticised them in 'Lessons of October', saying they were unwilling to support Lenin in the October revolution - Stalin watched the Left-wing party disintegrate, and throughout appeared to be a moderate peacemaker. Trotsky was accused of being the one to create divisions in the

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    By 1931 over 50% of peasant families were collectivised. The consequences of opposition were dreadful (see the section on the Terror above). * Tractor Stations were linked to collectives, in an attempt to mechanise production. Of course there were not enough tractors, and peasants didn't know how to look after them, so many quickly became unserviceable.

  1. The Soviet-German War 1941 - 1945.

    It has been argued that Stalin in fact planned a pre-emptive attack on Germany for the early summer of 1941, and was then thrown off-balance by the German invasion. 'For two years Soviet forces pushed the German army back into Germany ...'

  2. How Far Were the Soviet People Better off in 1941 than 1928?

    However, the state's industry was still backwards and it was lower than it had been in the Tsar years, so therefore this was not good for the Communists as conditions were better in the Tsar years then they were in 1928.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work