• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were the Tory reforms, 1822-1830, 'liberal' and 'enlightened'?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent were the Tory reforms, 1822-30, 'Liberal' and 'Enlightened'? [36 marks] The year 1822 has been traditionally regarded as a 'turning point' for Tory policies and attitude. The Cabinet reshuffle, replacing conservative Tories with 'liberal' and 'enlightened', and had been influenced by the ideas of John Locke and Adam Smith, seemed to effect a change in Tory policy. However, a significant case suggests that Tory reforms in this period were not so 'liberal' or 'enlightened'. The term 'enlightened' is used to describe party members' open-mindedness to change and tolerance of new ideas and perspectives. 'Liberal Toryism' is a term used to describe the fashion of Tory policy after the supposed 'turning point' in government, and means that they were far more tolerant towards change and new ideas, and adopted the 'liberal' and 'enlightened' ideas suggested by philosophers John Locke and Adam Smith, who, respectively, wrote about 'natural rights' and economic reform. The three main 'liberal' ideas to which the party's most 'liberal' Acts that were passed related were freedom, equality and tolerance. ...read more.


Religious reform was also regarded extremely important in the new Cabinet's 'liberal' attitude. The Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts (1823) gave all non-Anglicans the right to hold jobs and offices in central government and town corporations. These laws had, before, prohibited such positions being held by non-Anglicans. However, this repeal did not apply to Catholics. The Catholic Emancipation Act (1829) legalised the sitting of Catholics in both houses of parliament and allow them to obtain positions in all important offices of state, except Monarch, Lord Chancellor and Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, so they had increased representation in Parliament. However, it is argued that this was not such a period of reform and enlightenment. This is due to a number of reasons. In regards to Home Office reform, it is suggested that Peel was more concerned with efficiency, and these reforms only came when the economy had recovered and post-war discontent had died down. The Combination Acts had to be amended, as striking was impossible and there was a fear of further discontent amongst workers because of this, although the amendment banned picketing, which made striking almost impossible in any case. ...read more.


The Gaols Act did not prove very effective and only applied to prisons in large cities, and its main purpose was to improve efficiency. It could also be argued that the Metropolitan Act was introduced to increase the government's restraint on the public. Finally, the 'reshuffle' of the cabinet does not seem so much to be a reinstatement of 'enlightened' politicians with fresh, 'liberal' ideas, as each of these 'new men' had served in the Cabinet during the reactionary phase. In conclusion, as a revision of this period of apparent 'liberalism', it seems that it was not so. The reforms of the period all had limitations, the Cabinet consisted of existing members of the reactionary phase and the government only had efficiency and a means of evading parliamentary reform in mind. Therefore, it may be fair to state that 1822 is overstated as being a 'turning point'. The historian, Eric Evans, expressed that Liverpool was simply following in the footsteps of Pitt in that he simply continued his policies introduced before the Napoleonic War. Liverpool believed that it was unsafe to introduce reforms during the protest period after the war. After the war, when the economy had recovered, he continued with Pitt's reform and policies. 35/36 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    4 star(s)

    If convicted, children were to be sent to a borstal (corrective school) rather than to prison, and probation officers were appointed for the aftercare of young offenders. Although not vastly, the lives of children were somewhat improved thanks to the "Children's Charter", but children were still exploited to a certain extent.

  2. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    This meant that any political prisoner could be held without trial, this was seen as a massive breach of personal liberties. However it only lasted 10 months and only 44 people were arrested and 37 detained therefore it was a deterrent against further radical threats.

  1. Free essay

    Liberal reforms

    Prior to these reforms the unemployed had suffered greatly. Middle classes blamed poverty among the unemployed on their inability to find work on laziness and reluctance. Two acts were introduced to try and aid the unemployed from the poverty crisis. The first of these acts was the National Insurance act part II of 1911.

  2. "Tory Government in the Period 1822 to 1830 had a genuine desire to introduce ...

    The Governments actions of repression caused much resentment among the lower classes. There was a death penalty for breaking the Game Laws, this involved poaching on private land. The abolition of the income tax made the lower classed feel abused, as they would have to pay the same tax as the middle classes.

  1. How liberal were the Tories from 1821 to 1827?

    This was a symbol of a typical liberal country- that men were cohabiting with the police and that people were being monitored not by the extreme high powers, or by an unfair tyranny, but by other ordinary men. There are however, some arguments put forward by several modern historians stating that the Tories were not as liberal as first envisaged.

  2. 'Their only liberal measures were in trade and finance.' How far do you ...

    However, in 1828, a sliding scale on duty was emplaced?this meant that when British corn produce became more expensive the duty on foreign import was reduced. This can be seen as liberal because it protects the citizenry from unfair prices and also gives and equal opportunity for exporters to compete in the British market.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work