• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Today’s Star Wars

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Today's Star Wars It wasn't so long ago that the specter of nuclear war hung over our heads. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, it seemed that our major nuclear threat had disappeared almost overnight. Up to that time the United States had been developing a National Missile Defense system, or NMD, to protect the US and North America from attack by ballistic nuclear missiles. The thought of having a gigantic techno-umbrella that would shield us from falling nukes appeals to many Americans; we tend to see the obvious benefits without looking closely at the whole picture. The deployment of a National Missile Defense system receives the majority of popular support, but when all of the information is looked at, the drawbacks quickly become evident. What we consider to be a National Missile Defense got its start back in the Reagan administration. According to veteran political writer Lou Cannon, in an interview with the National Review, the whole costly idea of a NMD system was set into motion after President Reagan visited NORAD, the agency responsible for protecting North America from attack from the air. After watching the radar screens keeping watch over America he inquired what could be done to stop an incoming Soviet nuclear missile. ...read more.

Middle

(Galloway, 18) The concept is called "hitting a bullet with a bullet" and as you can imagine the technological challenges are immense. The interceptor rockets must travel at speeds of 12,000 mph and reach altitudes of 100 miles; with these speeds and altitudes the minutest change in direction translates to a miss downrange. Though the technological challenges are daunting, they are not the only obstacles to deployment. The balance of power between the US and Russia has been a delicate thing over the past 50 years. Over this time Washington and Moscow have signed many arms control treaties, one of them being the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, which specifically bans the development of a National Missile Defense system. Russia has made no attempt to hide its distaste of the US fielding a NMD system. Russia's Foreign Minister recently stated: "The prevailing system of arms control agreements is a complex and quite fragile structure. The collapse of the ABM treaty, would, therefore, undermine the entirety of disarmament agreements concluded over the last thirty years." (The Progressive, 8) Not only would the fielding of an NMD by the United States upset the balance of power, it may also raise feelings of strategic inferiority in the Russians. It would do nothing to encourage them to adhere to the START II treaty that drastically reduces the nuclear arsenal of both the U.S. ...read more.

Conclusion

(O'Hanlon, 70) These TMDs do not fall under the 1972 treaty, as their specifications do not bring them into the national defensive role. We need to address the real threat, and not waste our money on massively expensive projects that put us into contention with other nations. The arms race is as old as the human race. We have always been after the ultimate defense that will render our aggressors attacks futile. The Great Wall of China, Hadrian's Wall, and the Maginot Line, all were expected to keep out the invaders and protect the citizens within. All failed. It would seem that the US National Missile Defense policy is charged with the political agendas of powerful corporations and politicians who wish to be re-elected. The big three of missile defense: Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Rayethon, have already been given billions of taxpayer dollars to develop this system, they have delivered failure after failure. Continuing down this exorbitantly expensive route can destabilize the delicate power balance that we maintain with Russia, China, France and other nuclear capable countries. It is time we identify the more likely threat to the US and concentrate our efforts in that area. The Patriot Missile system and others like it should continue to receive funding, to protect our men and women in uniform, and we should be more alert to subversive attacks on our own soil. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Does Realism as a statist Ideology exist today?

    Although resolutions that are made are not legally binding on states, it is in the interests of the states involved to take them into consideration, and furthermore, the UN is held in high regards, and therefore the decisions made in this made by the UN hold much weight in the realm of international world politics.

  2. American Society today is a rich, powerful and highly populated

    These universities refused to admit the immigrants, some pressure groups formed to try and help the immigrants to get into universities but many wealthy and influential patrons and graduates stopped this. In addition to the social factors that contributed to growing hostility to the immigrants, there was also an economic

  1. Site visit to Hong Kongs Museum of Coastal Defense

    However, the gallery on the Handover and the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is also given the secrecy of the Chinese government; the lack of information is not that surprising. There are some pictures of that rainy summer day in 1997 and then some uniforms of the navy are displayed.

  2. History of the United States

    With Henry KISSINGER as an advisor and later as secretary of state, he began a kind of balance-of-power diplomacy. He preferred to keep the United States free of lasting commitments (even to former allies) so that it could move back and forth between the other four power centers--Europe, the USSR, China, and Japan--and maintain world equilibrium.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Yet with equal justification, Americans resented Soviet ingratitude. "The Russian authorities seem to want to cover up the fact that they are receiving outside help," American Ambassador Standley told a Moscow press conference in March 1943. "Apparently they want their people to believe that the Red Army is fighting this war alone."

  2. Africa and the role they played during both of the world wars.

    the war, injured soldiers were given little for their sacrifice and many of them died of hunger because they weren't able to find jobs. So ,basically, after the war everything returned as it was before the war as the African people weren't rewarded for the sacrifice they gave for this "European war".

  1. Arab-Israeli Wars.

    Nasser turned this military defeat into political victory.Sinai was to be demilitarized and to be held by a limited Egyptian power in case of any surprise attack.Also,UN forces were to be settled in the Gaza Strip,along Sinai and Sharm el-Sheikh.

  2. Only Yesterday by Frederick Lewis Allen - review

    After the war, the middle generation had "spent themselves and wanted a good time" (95). This good time came in the form of shorter skirts than ever before, petting parties, intimate dances, cosmetics, and foul language. The words "damn" and "hell" became commonplace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work