• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Trotsky described war as the 'locomotive of history'. Can it be argued that change in Russia in the period 1855 to 1964 was caused only by involvement in wars?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Trotsky described war as the 'locomotive of history'. Can it be argued that change in Russia in the period 1855 to 1964 was caused only by involvement in wars? The 1855-1964 period saw a series of major changes within Russia. Most of these, such as, the assassination of Alexander II, the revolutions of 1905 and 1917, Witte's Great Spurt, emancipation and Russia's continuing desire to industrialise can all trace their roots back to involvement in war. Russia was repeatedly involved in wars in the 1855-1964 period which repeatedly showed the backwardness and poor state of the country. Even when successful, the Cold War increased Stalin's paranoia and led to heavy spending and a restraint on change under Khrushchev. War was the integral factor in Russian development throughout the period, but it was the only cause for change. When considering if change in Russia was solely down to involvement in war, there is considerable continuity in the fact that most wars Russia fought in the 1855-1964 period were bad defeats that showed Russia's backwardness and the need for change. War highlights existing problems and further emphasises the need for change, widespread reforms were commonplace in the anticipation and aftermath of war throughout the Tsarist period. ...read more.

Middle

The Civil War had also led to Lenin conceding defeat, as Nicholas II had done previously in drafting the October Manifesto, by abandoning war communism for NEP. Stalin's fear of a future German invasion was also key to the speed in which the 5 year plans were implemented. There is considerable change here when compared with other wars, because Russia was victorious in the Great Patriotic war and became a global superpower, whereas previous defeats had merely highlighted existing problems and aggravated opponents in the process. War had a vast impact on Russia in the 1855-1964 period, and involvement in wars had a significant impact on the development of the Russian state. Throughout the period, the Tsarist and Communist regimes shared a common goal, to industrialise. This shared aim was set about in different ways - Stolypin and Stalin in particular had seen the need to boost agriculture in order to support heavy industrialisation, whereas the policies of Witte and Lenin were less focused on this issue. Whereas Stalin's main motivation could be traced back to war, Stolypin and Witte appeared to have more concern for the masses when implementing their policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Cheka heavily intensified aspects of repression seen under the 3rd section and Okhrana, and the KGB would continue to do so. Concessions brought about by the rulers as a result of war were also met with repression, such as Stolypin's necktie and in particular the unprecedented terror seen under Stalin, who believed that ''death is the answer to all problems''. The success of opponents was in part due to war, as best demonstrated by the February and October revolutions, however well timed reforms, shown by war to be badly needed, limited their effectiveness. Repression was used to rulers to keep their grip on power and maintain autocracy, not because of war. War was the integral factor in Russian development throughout the period. The First World War in particular brought about a complete shift in ideology and the creation of the world's first communist state, but also paved the way for the fast industrialisation of Russia and a shift in focus from agriculture to industry. War had repeatedly shown Russia as a backward, weak nation however victory in 1945 had established Russia as a global superpower. Despite its obvious importance, war was not the only locomotive of change within Russia during the 1855-1964 period. Change in Russia was not solely down to involvement in wars. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    High taxes were commonplace under the Tsars despite the axing of redemption payments in 1905, however in contrast Lenin's NEP ensured that such a heavy burden would not be repeated. Despite this advancement, the most heavy restrictions were seen under Stalin where the relentless use of power, paranoia and hostility led to an unprecedented scale of death and destruction.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    The Provisional Government had no control over the peasants. By contrast, the Bolsheviks and Lenin promised that land would be given to the peasants through their April Theses - 'Peace, Land, Bread'.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    This encouraged the setting up of Kolkhozes. * Many peasants began to spend more time on their private plots - by the end of the 1930s these were producing most of the country's eggs, milk and meat - than on their official duties. Why did famine break out in 1932?

  2. How War Affected Russia

    These direct changes were a result of the reforms that occured during the 1950s and '60s. For example, concerning the judiciary system in 1864, those on trial were given a legal right to have a defence, and the Tsar announced that the courts 'are swift, fair, merciful and equal for all our subjects' [ P.

  1. How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following ...

    A further aspect of control used by the Tsars was Alexander II's 'revolution from above' with the Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861.

  2. The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the ...

    In a similar manner to Nicholas II's concessions of 1905, Lenin knew the peasantry had to feed the workers and gave them their own bit of capitalism by allowing them to sell surplus grain. As with economic reform, war and revolution had again shown the need to introduce reform to appease growing political tension.

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    not appreciated by Russia as he wrote that Rasputin?s enemies charged him of being ?cynical?8 and of ?using his religion to mask his drive for sex, money and power?[8]. This weakness, when looked at with the other impacts of the war such as food shortages and economic problems, makes World

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    This idea led to Communism, which during Stalin?s rule became the form of government for the Soviet Union. Not only the Soviet Union made use of the ideology, but also widespread countries like Cuba, North Korea, and China adopted the Communist form of government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work