• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did Trotsky deserve to succeed Lenin? It is a common view amongst the uninitiated that Stalin was a relatively unknown and insignificant figure in Russian history until Lenin's death in January 1924. Trotsky, Lenin's brilliant accomplice and civil war hero, seemed to be the natural replacement for Lenin. It therefore comes as a surprise to many that Stalin managed to outmanoeuvre the 'vastly more talented and deserving Trotsky'1 to become Lenin's successor. However, it is on this issue of Trotsky being the more "deserving" of becoming the supreme power in Russia that much controversy surrounds. Despite the fact that 'no one else in the leadership came anywhere near him as a public speaker'2 and that he clearly 'excelled as a commentator, a critic, an orator, an executor of politics and was the ideal complement to Lenin'3, by 1929 Trotsky had been denounced as a Jew and a 'Leftist' by Stalin and the Central Committee. Once a Civil War hero and respected commander of the Red Army, the man who had been beside Lenin during the October Revolution of 1917, Trotsky found himself relieved of his position as War Commissar and robbed of his position in the Politburo by Stalin and his loyal bureaucracy. Stalin had become 'strong enough to expel Trotsky from the USSR'4, irrespective of Trotsky's supposed superiority as a politician and as a candidate for supreme power in Russia. However, in order to get a clearer view of why Trotsky is held in such high regard as a tactician and politician by so many historians and as the rightful (but of course unsuccessful) or at least most deserving successor of Lenin, it is necessary that his various successes are noted. Despite the fact that he was eventually thrown out of the party and expelled from Russia itself by Stalin, Trotsky saw great success and popularity during the October Revolution and the Civil War. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin and Trotsky had attempted to oppose Stalin's increasing influence in the party, where in December 1922 Lenin asked Trotsky to form a 'counter-bureaucratic bloc', quite literally aimed at killing off the Party's ever increasing reliance on a bureaucracy. This, however, proved unsuccessful, and by 1924 'Stalin had amassed so much personal leverage that, irrespective of ability, he had much greater power than other leaders'58 and the party bureaucracy (that was mainly loyal to Stalin) was still firmly in place. Before his death, Lenin produced a Testament in which he reached the conclusion that 'no one person was fit to succeed him'59, and he based his hopes on the unlikely co-operation of Trotsky and Stalin. Realising that there was now no chance of such co-leadership because of the clashing personalities of Trotsky's 'excessive self confidence and high handedness'60 and Stalin's 'rudeness'61, Lenin now openly denounced Stalin and recommended that he be relieved of his position in the Bolshevik party as General Secretary, hoping to have him replaced by a man who was 'more patient, more loyal, more courteous, and more considerate of his comrades, less capricious'62. Lenin knew that 'Trotsky's pre-eminence in terms of sheer ability'63 made him the most fit for leadership, but Lenin also realised that the 'apparat tended to dislike him, partly because he was an upstart Menshevik, but mostly because he attacked bureaucratisation'64. Trotsky's 'arrogant brilliance'65 earned him no favours from intellectuals of his own generation, 'nor did the workers favour him'66. Yet Lenin would have chosen Trotsky as his successor over Stalin without question, especially due to the way Stalin had acted towards his wife, Krupskaya and his handling of the Georgian affair. Trotsky also shared the view with Lenin of the Revolution as the beginning of World Revolution, and not Socialism in One Country. He confided in Trotsky to oppose Stalin, and proposed that he did this in the defence of the 'Georgians before the Central Committee against the prosecutors of Stalin and others in league with him'67. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pimlico 58 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 290, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 59 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 290, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 60 Extract from Lenin's Testament 61 Extract from Lenin's Testament 62 Extract from Lenin's Testament 63 Extract from Lenin's Testament 64 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 294, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 65 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 294, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 66 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 294, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 67 A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924 - page 795, Deaths and Departures - Orlando Figes, published by Pimlico 68 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 290, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 69 The Making of Modern Russia - Page 330, The Bolsheviks Conquer Power - Lional Kochan and Richard Abraham Second Edition, published by Penguin Books 70 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 293, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 71 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 293, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 72 The assumption made my the Central Committee and agreed upon by Trotsky 73 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 293, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford 74 A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891-1924 - page 801, Deaths and Departures - Orlando Figes, published by Pimlico 75 Despite the fact Lenin had been a proponent of 'World Revolution' 76 "Socialism in One Country (1925)", which asserted that Soviet Russia could successfully build socialism on its own. With this Stalin not only evoked massive national pride but also projected the idea of him as the saviour of Russia. 77 Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1992 Fourth Edition - page 293, Disputes and Decisions - J.N.Westwood, Oxford ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    It is clear that former dynasties were restored when it suited interest of the Great powers, but a legitimate ruler such as King of Saxony was threatened with dispossession of his territory, to satisfy Prussian claims. The Frenchman, Antonin Debidour, wrote in the 1890s that the allies 'consulted only their

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    to keep Britain out of the Baltic. * Although the assassination of the Tsar in march 801 and Nelson's bombardment of Copenhagen the following month brought the League to a speedy end, the new Tsar, Alexander I, despite his anti-French sympathies, showed no signs of wishing to form an Anglo-Russian alliance.

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Lenin's main role in 1917 was as a leader for the Bolshevik party and those who supported them. He was an inspirational leader rather than someone who led by actions. He rallied the troops and gave the people of Russia an alternative leader, leading them to believe in a better life through his speeches directly to the people.

  2. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Lenin appeared to want to be in conflict with the majority of his people; it is clear he did not listen to their wishes. With the removal of the 'Dumas' from the political sphere there appeared to be less free speech than ever before.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    with inflation, which had been bad throughout the war and in 1917 was rocketing upwards out of control. If the price index for 1913 is taken as a base, then by January 1917 prices had gone up 350% and by October 1430%.

  2. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    This was a big boost to the Bolshevik party as it was the first major city they held, and the Petrograd Soviets lost a majority of their seats. On the 30th August all Bolshevik prisoners, except those who had legal charges, were released from imprisonment.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    One reason that the Bolsheviks came to power was that the Provisional Government was unable to solve its problems efficiently for Russia. The mistakes and weaknesses of the Provisional Government were recognised by Lenin and the Bolsheviks who were able to capitalise on the government's failures in order to gain support for themselves.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    the Whites ha no single leader nor a set unified aims other than the defeat of the Bolsheviks. In general both sides were in guilty of atrocities. With both War Communism and the Civil War,brought loads of pain to the Russians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work