• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tudor Architecture 1500-1550

Extracts from this document...


Tudor Architecture 1500-1550 Between 1500-50, vast changes took place in English architecture, and the following sources agree to varying lengths about the impact of Henry V111. Source A is from a publication by William Harrison c1577, which highly flatters Henrys impact on English architecture, and is based on expert opinion, suggesting authenticity and reliability. Harrison lived during Henrys reign, and could give a broader overview of changes he made to building: a quote from the source emphasises Henrys building change "Those that were builded before the time of Henry V111 retain to these days and show the image of ancient workmanship" Harrison's extract states that Henry V111 was a more dominant force in architecture than the renaissance artists (e.g. Adrian the Emperor and Justinian the Lawgiver). Harrison focuses solely on the Kings impact, suggesting that the King set the "precedent" or mark for building standards and that his buildings were "perpetual" or everlasting compared to the ancient workmanship mentioned above. Harrison also said that the use of masonry "did never flourish in England better than this time" showing his innovative impact. ...read more.


Source A, c1577, would have put more emphasis on Henrys building anyway, because Henry would have altered most buildings which Wolsey had constructed in the early years of Henry's reign. Source B, c1526 was before Henrys influence took hold hence emphasising Wolseys building. After 1529, Henrys extra buildings and land was structured into an increased input of his own designs as shown in Sources D & E. Source D provides us with an 18th century engraving, depicting an interpretation of a 16th century building (Henry V111s house at Beaulieu, Essex) where today only the South Entrance and Central Coat of Arms remains. The engraving doesn't show us many significant signs of Henry's changes to Wolseys original building. Also, it is only an interpretation, and we don't know who it was produced by or who it was for, which casts doubt over its reliability. The fact its an 18th century engraving means that the building could have been added to over time, which limiots how much we can learn of Henrys impact, however the accompanying text states the engraving shows " a view of the palace of Beaulieu, commonly called New hall in Essex built by Henry V111", which implies Henry V111 made an impact on the structure. ...read more.


Henry's architectural impact increased since 1529 in the period that Nonsuch Palace was built. Source F puts into words the results shown in Source C, that Henry had a profound effect on architectural changes, as Thurley says Henry was "an active participant in the design of his buildings"" showing he was very innovative e.g. the new lodgings at Greenwich. The Source, like Source E says Henrys changes were mainly based on social changes like the need for privacy. The source says at Hampton Court "privy conceits were devised by his grace". The idea that Henry had an increased impact after 1530 in the other sources is also shown in Source F as Thurley states "Henrys ability, or perhaps inclination to design or influence the design of his residences did not develop until after 1530" and adding that "the king was dominated architecturally by Cardinal Wolsey" before 1530. In conclusion, the sources agree that Henrys involvement changed over time between 1500-50. Wolseys achievements came prior to 1530 (Sources B,C & F). Henrys major impact on architecture came after 1530 (Sources A, C, D, E & F). Overall, we need to acknowledge Wolseys and Henrys power and influence in English architecture 1500-50 to understand the changes that took place, and how the two influences are interlinked. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How useful is a visit to the Tudor parts of Hampton Court to find ...

    For example, when William and Mary came into possession of Hampton Court they decided to replace the, by then, old fashioned Tudor Palace with a more modern one, the Baroque style designed by Sir Christopher Wren. They had intended to transform the whole of Hampton Court but time and money

  2. The Effects of the Dissolution of the Monastries

    The monasteries were the traditional centres of relief for the poor. As well as the commoners having their 'support' taken away, the dispossessed monks added to the problem with the swelling throngs of the destitute. However, the inhabitants of the newly dissolved monasteries were usually given pensions of offered new employment within the church.

  1. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    ended up spending a lot of time at the Trask house, and finding herself getting very close to Lee and Adam, more so than her own parents. It was during this time, with Aron gone, that she discovered that she really didn't love Aron any more.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    Hope this helps. Submitted by: David Tutty, (Age 16) English > Q. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings about prejudice and inequality ? In 'Charlotte O'Neil's Song' the poet describes all the differences in lifestyle between the rich and the servants.

  1. How valuable is a field trip to the Tudor part of the Palace for ...

    I feel this is a major factor on the way that Hampton Court was used as Henry had money to spend and time to spend the money. This is why Henry built up such a wonderful and beautiful palace. As the country was peaceful, Henry had more time to socialise

  2. How would you convey the significance of Henry's skills as a king to a ...

    When he was young and his father was on the throne, Henry didn't act like a responsible prince, he would go out with his drinking companions and get drunk and into trouble. This didn't impress people. They knew that he was going to be their next king but Henry didn't seem to care.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work