• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Turkish Nationalism. Nationalism and economic reasons brought the Turkish people united to revolt against the Ottoman Empire under a leader called Mustafa Kemal. He is seen as the national hero of Turkey, which made Turkey into a strong republic state.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Essay D uring the early 1900s, many Empires collapsed, such as the Ottoman Empire. Nationalism and economic reasons brought the Turkish people united to revolt against the Ottoman Empire under a leader called Mustafa Kemal. He is seen as the national hero of Turkey, which made Turkey into a strong republic state. Before Mustafa Kemal came into sight, the Ottoman Empire was already surrounded by many problems. First, economic problems were brought because of New World silver and new trade routes from China to Europe. It caused gold to flew out of Ottoman's Empire, which led them experienced disastrous inflation. Moreover, many wars were lost which caused the Ottoman Empire paying concession while the new idea of reform coming from Europe started to affect the people. ...read more.

Middle

However, the people demanded more than that, they wanted freedom and liberal. In the 1850-1860s, intellectuals known as the New Ottomans engaged people with Tanzimat policies about fatherland, freedom, and constitutionalism. The Tanzimat policies brought to a change for the government, which parliament and constitution is formed in 1876. Nevertheless, the failure in war with Russia and European demands of Sphere of Influence in Middle East called for the change back for the form of government. By the late 1880s, the government changed back and the Sultan Abdulhamid was still embracing Pan-Islamism while nationalists called for secular Ottoman pseudo-nationalism and Pan-Turkism. These nationalists formed a group called Young Turks, which later became the overthrowing power of the Ottoman Empire. ...read more.

Conclusion

They drove away the Western Imperialist countries, and formed the Republic of Turkey. Under the command of Mustafa Kemal, the Republic of Turkey abandoned traditional clothing like fez and veil. Many Islamic laws and traditions are also abolished. Turkish people also started to have European names and their writing is updated in the Roman alphabet. Therefore, we can conclude that Turkey changed a lot towards Europe when Mustafa Kemal was President. Ottoman, just like the other Empires, was ended by revolt because of nationalism. Every empire has a problem, that the state has many different nations, which always caused conflict. The fall of the Ottoman Empire, let us see the power of people when united; it also let us know about nationalism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. 19th Century Nationalism

    Both are based on the deterioration of their governments, but the sources of these problems are different. The European conflicts of power came from within their own principalities. Chinese nationalist movements for independence are a direct reaction to the aggressiveness of European conquest.

  2. Gandhi was instrumental in India achieving its independence. Gandhi was able to procure Indias ...

    Close to 60 000 people were arrested but this did not matter because the goal of the salt march had been achieved. The Salt March had convinced Indians that they could win against the British and it convinced many British officers that they could not hold India down by force.

  1. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    urban workers and activists, known as the 'twenty five thousanders' were sent into cities to round up support for collectivisation and encourage peasants to cooperate, as well as find out and eliminate kulaks. This meant the party gained control of villages, creating a climate of fear and thus more cooperation, making communist values dominant in the country side.

  2. The First English Civil War

    Worse than this was the news from Yorkshire and Scotland. Charles had at last assented to Montrose's plan and promised him a marquessate. The first attempt to raise the Royalist standard in Scotland, however, gave no omen of its later triumphs.

  1. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    The aims were similar as both used capitalism as a way of better grasping Communism; as Lenin summarises, "We are taking one step backward to later take two steps forward", 19suggesting that the New Economic Policy would slowly turn into something else as soon as the Russian economy was prepared.

  2. Discuss the course and consequences of the Arab Israeli Conflict

    What Samuel was stating, was that a "Jewish minority rule should not be imposed on an Arab majority, but a Jewish majority should be created first", and although there was in no way enough room for all of the world's Jews, there was room in Palestine for another 3 or 4 million.

  1. To what extent did a strong succession mean a strong reign in the years ...

    The meticulous control of his new kingdom can again demonstrate his authoritative, intolerant, supremely dominant personality that lead to a strong, efficient reign as king. In direct juxtaposition however, Stephen, who most certainly had the strongest succession of all the Norman kings, failed to effectively deal with such a threat to his kingship.

  2. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    His methods were always peaceful; moral persuasion through mass agitation. This was most significantly displayed in his mobilisation of the peasantry during the struggle for Emancipation, a thing which to such an extent was never again successfully repeated, constitutionally nor revolutionarily.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work