• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

U.S. troops in iraq - A must or something else?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

U.S. troops in iraq A must or something else? When George W. Bush, the president of the United States of America, declarated the war against Iraq, the main reason of war was the self-protection. This simple thing, self-protection is also not simple in this case, the foundament was the so called Bush doctrine, that means, that the USA has the right to protect his security all over the world with a strike on his enemies, before getting the chance to attack America. The Bush doctrine was created after the 11th of september 2001. when islam funfamentalists destroyed the World Trade Center, the simbol of globalization and the business power of the West. ...read more.

Middle

The two biggest promoters of the war against Iraq were George W. Bush, the president of the United States and Tony Blair, the prime minister of the United Kingdom. In their speeches they were talking about Hussein like they already have had all the evidence for the offences, which -in their point of view-, legislated the war against Iraq. There were only two countries who really sent troops to Iraq at the beginning, U.K. and U.S.. Some other partners of America sent peacekeepers to the region, but those are just symbolic forces to show partnership. We can say that the ex-leader of Iraq is guilty in genocidium, but no evidence has been found yet which proves that Iraq had a bigger arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. ...read more.

Conclusion

forces like bringing them freedom, but they felt somebody was occupying their homeland. It is not unerstandable for them why are american soldiers still there, after the U.S. troops defeated the Saddam regime. The other thing they simply can not take in, is that USA is always talking about reconstructing Iraq, after 13 years of embargo, and after weeks of heavy bombing. The administration has to face the possibility of a second Vietnam, because the national resistance is getting its form in Iraq. U.S. soldiers feel themselves in danger and they can not master the situation. Bush's jurney in Baghdad shows this very well, because he arrived secretly in the dark, stayed one and a half hour and flied home like nothing happened. Now the american soldiers do not even know what they are exactly fighting for. 05.12.2003 M�t� Zolt�n 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    Other reports are based upon conjecture. However, upon examination of the available evidence and other information, it is certainly highly likely that Iraq is attempting to develop a nuclear weapon. Chemical Weapons Iraq claims that they have no chemical weapons. As there are no weapon inspectors in Iraq, there is no hard evidence that Iraq has possession or is manufacturing chemical weapons.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Besides, the war continued after the occupation of Al-Faw for a relatively long time. However Iran did not benefit at all from this operation, the only benefit that arose from occupying Al-Faw was Iran's ability to hit Kuwait with the missiles and scare her rulers and her inhabitants.

  1. History of the United States

    was practically as large as Western Europe and fought with a determined passion for its independence. The North had to invade and defeat the opposition in order to win; the South had only to defend its borders. The conflict was not so uneven as it seemed.

  2. Should Britain Pull Out Their Troops From Iraq?

    In the piece of research it tells you about 3 out of 5 people want British troops taken out of Iraq with 29% wanting immediate withdrawal. Some of the advantages of keeping the troops in are that we are helping America in their time at war and also we are helping them keep the war crisis down to a minimum.

  1. George Walker Bush.

    His foreign (and domestic, to a lesser degree) policy was subsequently defined, above all, by the "War on Terrorism". This was first described in a special "Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People" on September 20, 2001 in which Bush announced that America was fighting a war on terrorism.

  2. Citizenship Comparing two articles - " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence ...

    all the difficulty, Saddam Hussein, is still yet to make an appearance in the media. The war introduced several technologically advanced weapon systems. As well, the United States forged a broad-based international coalition that confronted Iraq militarily strategy. In article 2 it quotes " Iraqi's tyrant has weapons of mass

  1. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    These are unmanned gliders, ten feet in length with a speed of 300mph and a range of 72miles, which looked like a manned aircraft on a radar screen and which could drop radar-calibrated metal strips called chaff, to add to the jamming effect.

  2. The case against war on Iraq.

    The highlight the report was that Iraq possessed 'al-Samoud 2' missiles. These missiles, Mr. Powell claimed, could be projected at a range greater than that permitted to Iraq by the UN. This range is an arbitrary figure, the projection of a missile depends on many factors, including wind speed and an element of chance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work