• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, were contemporaries correct in regarding the British army as ‘lions led by donkeys’?

Extracts from this document...


Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, were contemporaries correct in regarding the British army as 'lions led by donkeys'? Through out the First World War, there have been many incidents of bravery, and others of coward ness. This may not just apply for the soldiers but sometimes for the general themselves, but were the generals to blame, or were the soldiers to blame for the high casualties. Were there huge casualties due to the inexperienced soldiers, or the badly planned attacks by the generals? In the sources through out the booklet there has been times where the soldiers have been brave. The first reason was due to them choosing to enter the war without conscription. This was largely due to the propaganda that was at that time, which encouraged them to fight for king and country and to protect there family, however the main reason for them joining the war was due to them thinking it would be over by Christmas, which was only a few months away. One of the propaganda sources is a postcard where soldiers would write there letters on, on the front of that postcard was a picture of five soldiers looking over the top in the trenches, the source also shows that here cloth are clean. The caption of this source says "time for one more" which shows that life was very relaxed. This example gives us the view that the British soldiers were brave and not afraid of the war, bravery and fearlessness are common characteristic of a lion, but would they of volunteered if they knew how long the war would last, and what they would encounter. ...read more.


There were two main reasons or the battle of the Somme, the first reason was to relieve pressure at Verdun were the French armies were loosing badly, the second was to destroy as much of the German morale as possible and lower there morale. The first part of the Somme was well planed, and the Germans started moving her troops from Verdun to the Somme, this is where the first part of the Somme offensive went according to plan, and the generals should not be characterised as donkeys. However it was the very badly planned second part of the offensive that made the generals in control look like donkeys. The seven-day bombardment of the German front lines was a failure, because the Germans hid in deep bunkers underground. When it came to the planes destroying the German artilleries they couldn't see due to the clouds, this meant that when the British infantry were order to walk over the top, they took violent fire from the German soldiers. This was a badly planned attack by the generals; because they didn't know what the German trenches looked like, and none of the generals had visited the front line so wouldn't know how to plan a good attack. This badly planned attack which led to more than 50,000 British casualties, showed the generals as donkeys. But was General Haig, the chief general of the British armies a donkey. There are many reasons why he could have been a donkey, and other reasons to why he wasn't a donkey. ...read more.


The reason the third war of Ypres didn't go well was because the weather was against his plans. The British armies gained a lot of experience during the war and became a strong army. Towards the end of the war Haig has improved the use of artillery in the British army to mare it more accurate. Also the British armies of different areas (marines, infantry, artillery, air force) were able to work together in any circumstances to beat the enemy. This show's that sometimes Haig wasn't seen as a donkey, but as a leader who ended the war, and brought a victory to Britain and the allies. However there were other times when historians and the people, due to the high casualties, regarded him as a Donkey, but could a war be won without having high casualties on the front lines. This shows us that through out the war there were many incidents where the soldiers acted as lions, and the generals acted as donkeys, and vice versa. I think that the British armies were lions, but weren't led by donkeys, but by generals who did what they were thought to do in military school, and no one else had any better ideas at the time. So this war of attrition (wearing the enemy down) was successful in the end, also every other country was using more or les the same plan. This tells us that although people were blaming Haig for his bad plans, no one actually came up with any better ideas to win the war. So Haig ?? ?? ?? ?? By Ahmed Omar. 11 LJC 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Does the film 'The Battle of The Somme' provide us with a realistic picture ...

    3 star(s)

    Many sources hint that the conditions were very poor for instance the Cartoons show that the trenches were very wet, muddy and that the place was generally very deafening due to the fact that howitzers and other forms of guns were being fired constantly.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The first source is written by Lloyd George to Haig on 21 September, 1916, just as the war had begun. The Battle of Somme started on 1st July 1916, Haig and Joffre planned a joint attack on the German lines near Bapaume.

  1. Lion Led by Donkeys

    But only with a heavy loss can such an attack be carried through". This source is quite reliable since the newspaper is trying to tell the truth to the readers but it could also be quite biased furthermore there is no picture to back up the evidence.

  2. Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the Saviour of The Western World ...

    This information provided is written by one of the only people who were constantly alongside Kennedy throughout the predicament and could see the pressures he was having to contend with. This is also primary evidence and is accurate as this was one of the closest men to the president.

  1. Lion Led By Donkeys

    John Terraine tells us that this war was on a much bigger scale, as there were mass production of munitions and mass recruitment of soldiers also weapons of mass destruction were used as well as poor communications between generals and the front lines.

  2. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, in what ways were ...

    Their solution to the problem was conscription - compulsory military service. The Military Service Act was passed in 1916, bringing conscription into force for men aged 18-41. Eventually many people welcomed conscription. However, some of those people who had not volunteered before conscription was introduced still did not join up.

  1. Do these sources, and the site visit at Hartford Works, fully explain how Oldham ...

    in Oldham's industrial past. By the large-scale building evidence at the site visit and using the maps, we can deduce that Platt Bros was an important company in Oldham's cotton-spinning industry. Generally, we saw separate mills on the skyline one the hills{which are obviously not mills anymore} and we can conclude that they are

  2. Were Contemporaries Correct in Viewing Chamberlain as a Peacemaker?

    There are many reasons for both Chamberlain being a peacemaker, and having hidden objectives. I will study all the available information to me, and conclude whether or not Chamberlain truly was a peacemaker or if he was simply a highly paid coward.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work