• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, were contemporaries correct in regarding the British army as ‘lions led by donkeys’?

Extracts from this document...


Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, were contemporaries correct in regarding the British army as 'lions led by donkeys'? Through out the First World War, there have been many incidents of bravery, and others of coward ness. This may not just apply for the soldiers but sometimes for the general themselves, but were the generals to blame, or were the soldiers to blame for the high casualties. Were there huge casualties due to the inexperienced soldiers, or the badly planned attacks by the generals? In the sources through out the booklet there has been times where the soldiers have been brave. The first reason was due to them choosing to enter the war without conscription. This was largely due to the propaganda that was at that time, which encouraged them to fight for king and country and to protect there family, however the main reason for them joining the war was due to them thinking it would be over by Christmas, which was only a few months away. One of the propaganda sources is a postcard where soldiers would write there letters on, on the front of that postcard was a picture of five soldiers looking over the top in the trenches, the source also shows that here cloth are clean. The caption of this source says "time for one more" which shows that life was very relaxed. This example gives us the view that the British soldiers were brave and not afraid of the war, bravery and fearlessness are common characteristic of a lion, but would they of volunteered if they knew how long the war would last, and what they would encounter. ...read more.


There were two main reasons or the battle of the Somme, the first reason was to relieve pressure at Verdun were the French armies were loosing badly, the second was to destroy as much of the German morale as possible and lower there morale. The first part of the Somme was well planed, and the Germans started moving her troops from Verdun to the Somme, this is where the first part of the Somme offensive went according to plan, and the generals should not be characterised as donkeys. However it was the very badly planned second part of the offensive that made the generals in control look like donkeys. The seven-day bombardment of the German front lines was a failure, because the Germans hid in deep bunkers underground. When it came to the planes destroying the German artilleries they couldn't see due to the clouds, this meant that when the British infantry were order to walk over the top, they took violent fire from the German soldiers. This was a badly planned attack by the generals; because they didn't know what the German trenches looked like, and none of the generals had visited the front line so wouldn't know how to plan a good attack. This badly planned attack which led to more than 50,000 British casualties, showed the generals as donkeys. But was General Haig, the chief general of the British armies a donkey. There are many reasons why he could have been a donkey, and other reasons to why he wasn't a donkey. ...read more.


The reason the third war of Ypres didn't go well was because the weather was against his plans. The British armies gained a lot of experience during the war and became a strong army. Towards the end of the war Haig has improved the use of artillery in the British army to mare it more accurate. Also the British armies of different areas (marines, infantry, artillery, air force) were able to work together in any circumstances to beat the enemy. This show's that sometimes Haig wasn't seen as a donkey, but as a leader who ended the war, and brought a victory to Britain and the allies. However there were other times when historians and the people, due to the high casualties, regarded him as a Donkey, but could a war be won without having high casualties on the front lines. This shows us that through out the war there were many incidents where the soldiers acted as lions, and the generals acted as donkeys, and vice versa. I think that the British armies were lions, but weren't led by donkeys, but by generals who did what they were thought to do in military school, and no one else had any better ideas at the time. So this war of attrition (wearing the enemy down) was successful in the end, also every other country was using more or les the same plan. This tells us that although people were blaming Haig for his bad plans, no one actually came up with any better ideas to win the war. So Haig ?? ?? ?? ?? By Ahmed Omar. 11 LJC 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Does the film 'The Battle of The Somme' provide us with a realistic picture ...

    3 star(s)

    However Cartoons may not have been a good reliable source because they were used to make fun out of the situations. The way that the film portrays Trench conditions can be supported by several of the sources, the sources suggest that the British trenches were comfortable and the Photographs show that the soldiers were enjoying themselves.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The first source is written by Lloyd George to Haig on 21 September, 1916, just as the war had begun. The Battle of Somme started on 1st July 1916, Haig and Joffre planned a joint attack on the German lines near Bapaume.

  1. Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the Saviour of The Western World ...

    However the flaws in this are that someone close to Kennedy would not bad mouth him, and this means that Sorenson's evidence could be considered slightly biased. The other flaw is that this evidence was given at Kennedy's funeral, with emotions running high it would be easy to exaggerate what happened in the Cuban missile crisis.

  2. Were Some Contemporaries Correct In Their Belief That Churchill Was A Great War Leader?

    In 1896 when his regiment was sent to India, he secured a temporary transfer to the turbulent North West Frontier where a tribal insurrection was under way. When the Boer War (1899-1902) broke out in South Africa he went as a journalist, was captured by the Boers while defending an ambushed train and imprisoned in a military prison.

  1. Was the public misled about conditions in the Trenches?

    Q7b.The sources H and J could have been quit reliable in a way. They seem quit a lot more realistic than say sources F G. and I for example we know that trenches are not exactly a nice environment. In fact they were horrid and discussing.

  2. Lion Led by Donkeys

    But only with a heavy loss can such an attack be carried through". This source is quite reliable since the newspaper is trying to tell the truth to the readers but it could also be quite biased furthermore there is no picture to back up the evidence.

  1. Lion Led By Donkeys

    John Terraine tells us that this war was on a much bigger scale, as there were mass production of munitions and mass recruitment of soldiers also weapons of mass destruction were used as well as poor communications between generals and the front lines.

  2. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, in what ways were ...

    country now received telegrams from the War Office informing them their loved ones had been killed, wounded or were missing. The shocking reality of the war was proclaimed from every newspaper and people were horrified. The government now had a huge problem; voluntary recruitment would soon not produce enough soldiers to replace the dead and wounded.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work