• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain how far Hitler(TM)s rise to power, up to March 1933 was achieved legally

Extracts from this document...


Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain how far Hitler's rise to power, up to March 1933 was achieved legally. Hitler's rise to power was a massive success for the Nazi party in March 1933. However there are a number of different reasons that may account for Hitler's rise to power. It is often argued that Hitler did not achieve this legally through the use of fear and violence, although there is evidence to suggest that Hitler did use the political situation to his advantage due to his great ability as not a only a politician but as a speaker. First of all, it is undoubted that Hitler's political ability added to the rise of the Nazi party, with his talent of convincing many political leaders to back him. Source A also agrees with this point - "Hitler came to power due to his political intrigue among leading members". ...read more.


However it can be said that the legal revolution was just a smoke screen. Source B also agrees with this point naming it a "propaganda gimmick" to gain much political support without the growing resentment from other parties, "making all legal, political or intellectual resistance difficult". Hitler was clever in his use of the legal revolution using it as a way to take advantage of potentially controversial situations legally by previously illegal means the key example of this being the manipulation of the Reichstag fire. Previous to the Reichstag fire, there was much resentment from the Nazi party towards communism and the communists who were part of it in Germany. Many communists were intimidated, terrorised and beaten behind the scenes, however the Reichstag fire in early March 1933 meant that the hatred towards communism could be spread into the public and in turn gain further support for the party. ...read more.


This first law benefited the party, as it not only meant that the threat of a communist uprising was dimmed but also that any criticism of the party would not be in the public eye. The second point stated "the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the supreme authority" in order to "restore security". This gave the Nazi's a further increase in power as meant that they could effectively rule by decree legally without any opposition if they felt it was necessary to do so. Although this could be seen as a suspension rights many people let the party get away with it due to the fear that had been created from the now "real threat" of communism. In conclusion, it is true to say that Hitler gained power through a number of then legal means, but these were only publicly accepted and tolerated due to fear that was injected into society, therefore although Hitler's rise to power was mainly achieved legally, there is no doubt that power was consolidated through the use of political violence and fear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    It is apparent that although there were clear weaknesses in the oppositions' ranks, these were not pertinent without taking into account Mussolini's opportunist approach towards them. One of the most substantial methods by which they increased their appeal was through their fluctuating message.

  2. The Main Reason for the Rise of the Nazi Party to Power in 1933 ...

    and advertising campaigns made them think that it would be the best thing that could happen to Germany and its people, and they needed a way out of their economic depression. Hitler was also seen as a very brave, hard working man, who fought for what he believed in -

  1. Mussolini and Hitler: Road to Power

    The next day Hitler and his Nazis started a march on Munich, but the government had been alarmed, so they were met with police force. Hitler fled but two days later, was arrested, charged with treason, and sent to prison.

  2. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    In contrast to the hierarchal supremacy of Aryans, the Untermenschen (inferior races) were to be expelled from the people's community. These included mainly Jews, the physically handicapped and mentally ill, communists and political opponents, resistance groups, gypsies, homosexuals, criminals, and more.

  1. Stalin's manipulation of the central organs of the Communist Party was they key reason ...

    This includes Stalin's policies and in particular "Socialism in one country" which urged for modernisation through industrialisation without the help of those outside. This policy carried undertones of nationalism and patriotism, appealing to the masses despite it clearly going against the Marxist theory.

  2. The Rise and Fall of Adolf Hitler.

    This quote also shows that Hitler killed anyone who disagreed with him. 12. Name two or three persons who were friends of this person. Explain what they were like. Explain how they might have had an impact on your person.

  1. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    Versailles can hence be seen as a necessity in controlling the overly ambitious Germans. Therefore passage A is invalid by arguing that Versailles destroying the German pride was the cause of conflict as Germans needed to be weakened or they would have created more problems if left to their own devices.

  2. Study sources B and D. Compare these Sources as evidence for the reasons why ...

    be truthful at a trial; he is also likely to be very wary and careful of what he is saying to avoid the blame landing on him. Whereas Source D blames different groups of people - the right wing conservatives, elites and large owners.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work