• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain how far Hitler(TM)s rise to power, up to March 1933 was achieved legally

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain how far Hitler's rise to power, up to March 1933 was achieved legally. Hitler's rise to power was a massive success for the Nazi party in March 1933. However there are a number of different reasons that may account for Hitler's rise to power. It is often argued that Hitler did not achieve this legally through the use of fear and violence, although there is evidence to suggest that Hitler did use the political situation to his advantage due to his great ability as not a only a politician but as a speaker. First of all, it is undoubted that Hitler's political ability added to the rise of the Nazi party, with his talent of convincing many political leaders to back him. Source A also agrees with this point - "Hitler came to power due to his political intrigue among leading members". ...read more.

Middle

However it can be said that the legal revolution was just a smoke screen. Source B also agrees with this point naming it a "propaganda gimmick" to gain much political support without the growing resentment from other parties, "making all legal, political or intellectual resistance difficult". Hitler was clever in his use of the legal revolution using it as a way to take advantage of potentially controversial situations legally by previously illegal means the key example of this being the manipulation of the Reichstag fire. Previous to the Reichstag fire, there was much resentment from the Nazi party towards communism and the communists who were part of it in Germany. Many communists were intimidated, terrorised and beaten behind the scenes, however the Reichstag fire in early March 1933 meant that the hatred towards communism could be spread into the public and in turn gain further support for the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

This first law benefited the party, as it not only meant that the threat of a communist uprising was dimmed but also that any criticism of the party would not be in the public eye. The second point stated "the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the supreme authority" in order to "restore security". This gave the Nazi's a further increase in power as meant that they could effectively rule by decree legally without any opposition if they felt it was necessary to do so. Although this could be seen as a suspension rights many people let the party get away with it due to the fear that had been created from the now "real threat" of communism. In conclusion, it is true to say that Hitler gained power through a number of then legal means, but these were only publicly accepted and tolerated due to fear that was injected into society, therefore although Hitler's rise to power was mainly achieved legally, there is no doubt that power was consolidated through the use of political violence and fear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    In contrast to the hierarchal supremacy of Aryans, the Untermenschen (inferior races) were to be expelled from the people's community. These included mainly Jews, the physically handicapped and mentally ill, communists and political opponents, resistance groups, gypsies, homosexuals, criminals, and more.

  2. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    admitting that Versailles had a grave impact on Germany would contradict her view that Versailles had little influence on the recovered Germany's oppressive attitude. She instead sees the treaty as a tool which Hitler used neatly in propaganda. This argument is correct as Hitler did use propaganda as a tactic

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    him. Therefore, the Catholic Church, despite having the numerical basis to pose a threat to Fascism, had little potential to do so because of their conservative nature (synonymous with the Fascists) and the personal affiliations of their spiritual leader.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Five categories were drawn up: (1) major offenders, punishable by death or life imprisonment; (2) offenders, sentenced to a maximum of ten years; (3) lesser offenders, to be placed on probation; (4) followers who went along with the NSDAP; and (S)

  1. The Rise and Fall of Adolf Hitler.

    On April 30, 1945 Hitler kills himself, because he realizes he cannot win the war. 11. Quote something this person said or wrote that reflects his or her thinking. Explain why you think it reflects the person's thinking. Your answer must be at least ten sentences long.

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Question

    On the other hand, by pulling out of the War he saved money, lives and possible humiliation. For the Russian people, pulling out of the War was a good thing, millions of soldiers were dying which put morale down. After Lenin ended War Communism following the end of the Civil War, he introduced this NEP (New Economic Policy).

  1. Mussolini and Hitler: Road to Power

    The party was against Germany's treatment by the Treaty of Versailles and that struck a cord with many Germans. Hitler soon became leader of the party, but the party remained relatively small. Hitler was very much inspired by Mussolini and his fascism, and Nazism was based on that.

  2. Study sources B and D. Compare these Sources as evidence for the reasons why ...

    Source B states that if the current "... opportunity were missed, a revolt of the Nationalist Socialists and civil war was likely". Source D says appointing Hitler was the only way to gain "...a workable solution to Germany's crisis". Both sources agree that Hindenburg was important - overall he actually appointed Hitler as chancellor - he was the only one that could appoint a chancellor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work