• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain how far Hitler(TM)s rise to power, up to March 1933 was achieved legally

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain how far Hitler's rise to power, up to March 1933 was achieved legally. Hitler's rise to power was a massive success for the Nazi party in March 1933. However there are a number of different reasons that may account for Hitler's rise to power. It is often argued that Hitler did not achieve this legally through the use of fear and violence, although there is evidence to suggest that Hitler did use the political situation to his advantage due to his great ability as not a only a politician but as a speaker. First of all, it is undoubted that Hitler's political ability added to the rise of the Nazi party, with his talent of convincing many political leaders to back him. Source A also agrees with this point - "Hitler came to power due to his political intrigue among leading members". ...read more.

Middle

However it can be said that the legal revolution was just a smoke screen. Source B also agrees with this point naming it a "propaganda gimmick" to gain much political support without the growing resentment from other parties, "making all legal, political or intellectual resistance difficult". Hitler was clever in his use of the legal revolution using it as a way to take advantage of potentially controversial situations legally by previously illegal means the key example of this being the manipulation of the Reichstag fire. Previous to the Reichstag fire, there was much resentment from the Nazi party towards communism and the communists who were part of it in Germany. Many communists were intimidated, terrorised and beaten behind the scenes, however the Reichstag fire in early March 1933 meant that the hatred towards communism could be spread into the public and in turn gain further support for the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

This first law benefited the party, as it not only meant that the threat of a communist uprising was dimmed but also that any criticism of the party would not be in the public eye. The second point stated "the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the supreme authority" in order to "restore security". This gave the Nazi's a further increase in power as meant that they could effectively rule by decree legally without any opposition if they felt it was necessary to do so. Although this could be seen as a suspension rights many people let the party get away with it due to the fear that had been created from the now "real threat" of communism. In conclusion, it is true to say that Hitler gained power through a number of then legal means, but these were only publicly accepted and tolerated due to fear that was injected into society, therefore although Hitler's rise to power was mainly achieved legally, there is no doubt that power was consolidated through the use of political violence and fear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    These post-war difficulties were significant in the growth of support for Mussolini, the man who most saw the opportunity to exploit them. Blinkhorn's statement is accurately shown by the fact that inflation continued, economic strains grew due to no demand for munitions and 2 million soldiers were demobilised, contributing to mass unemployment.

  2. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    She is valid in arguing that Hitler's actions greatly contributed to conflict as witnessed in 1939 when he invaded Poland causing further problems. However she fails to recognise that Versailles equally had an effect on problems that followed. This is a limitation in her argument and is perhaps deliberate as

  1. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    In contrast to the hierarchal supremacy of Aryans, the Untermenschen (inferior races) were to be expelled from the people's community. These included mainly Jews, the physically handicapped and mentally ill, communists and political opponents, resistance groups, gypsies, homosexuals, criminals, and more.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    whitewashed by what they called Persilscheine-testimonials obtained by many Germans from priests, anti-Nazis, or Jews who attested to the sterling quality of the holder and were then given to the tribunals as affidavits. A contemporary joke compared the tribunals to laundries that one entered with a brown shirt and exited with a white one.

  1. The Main Reason for the Rise of the Nazi Party to Power in 1933 ...

    He would tell them what he was going to do, (get them jobs, stop hyperinflation, etc) but fail to mention how exactly he intended to do it, but this did not matter. People believed him and they loved him for what he was saying about how he was planning to fix Germany.

  2. Mussolini and Hitler: Road to Power

    This had severe consequences for Germany's economy, and the Government resorted to printing new money. As a result prices started going up and hyperinflation set in. In 1923 Hitler decided, now was the time to try and seize power; and inspired by Mussolini's March on Rome he planned to take over Munich with the help of his storm troopers.

  1. Assess the reasons why Hitler and the NSDAP gained power in 1933:

    There was also a major aspiration of the union of German people through the abolishment of the Anschluss. The party was popular with Nationalists who wanted a united German Empire and pledged to rearm Germany to make the nation strong again, which gained further support.

  2. Study sources B and D. Compare these Sources as evidence for the reasons why ...

    be truthful at a trial; he is also likely to be very wary and careful of what he is saying to avoid the blame landing on him. Whereas Source D blames different groups of people - the right wing conservatives, elites and large owners.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work