• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire in Europe after 1804 offered little benefit to its subjects.

Extracts from this document...


Adam Appleby Centre No. 39339 Candidate No. 7004 Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleon?s Empire in Europe after 1804 offered little benefit to its subjects. Views regarding if Napoleon offered virtuous benefits to the subjects of his Empire are fraught with different view points. Interpretations B and C both agree with the viewpoint that Napoleon offered very little benefit to his subjects, ?The ideals of legal equality? social designs?, interpretation. Conversely, interpretations A and D support the opposite idea that being part of the Napoleonic Empire was actually very beneficial to the subjects, ?liberated from seigniorial rights?; ?Even the downsides such as? for a centralized state?. Taking all interpretations into consideration and actual knowledge of the Napoleonic Empire, it is easy to see that while Napoleon ruled with an iron fist, he did indeed offer several benefits to subjects of his Empire directly or indirectly which both can be seen in Poland by the use of Napoleon in their national hymn of living up to ?us and Napoleon? interpretation D. Both interpretations, A and D, show clear disagreement with the view that Napoleon was of little benefit to European subjects after 1804. Firstly interpretation A shows this with ?Napoleon saw the Civil Code? the Civil Code everywhere.? This contradicts interpretation B?s view of Napoleon as a ?warrior overlord?, because he strengthens satellite states with his Civil Code by removing the remnants of feudalism, which would increase their political power inside the Napoleonic Empire. ...read more.


Interpretation A, while grouped as disagreeing, shows that Napoleon always put France above the subjects, ?The key to the Napoleonic?French industry.? While the Empire had a market of 80 million, all of the subjects had to come behind French industry. For example, the Kingdom of Italy?s industry for manufactured products and which is suffered economically for. Interpretation B supports the view that while Napoleon helped to end feudalism technically, he encouraged it in principle, ?Feudalism, though?even labour services.? The end of feudalism can be linked directly to the use of the Civil Code within the Empire. Interpretation A shows this, ?Napoleon saw the...Civil Code everywhere.? The Civil Code spelt the end of the feudalism, but it was not imposed in every subject?s nation. Meaning that, feudalism did indeed still exist within the Empire, but only when it was beneficial for Napoleon to not impose the Civil Code in that nation. Leading to the assumption that the Empire brought more benefits to countries that would bring benefit back to France. Nations that could give Napoleon the military and other resources he wanted had the Civil Code imposed upon them to make it easier to collect this. Interpretation D has the general view that the Empire benefits were for the greater good of the nations within it, ?In most European?in the long run.? The subjects under Napoleon may not have benefited under him, only after the dissolution of the Empire did the ex-subjects of the Empire benefit. Meaning that the benefits the Napoleonic Empire offered were mainly long term benefits. ...read more.


Interpretation A reveals that the annexed territories were allowed to maintain a degree of national identity, ?In annexed territories?second language.? This could mean several things, firstly that the annexed territories were allowed to keep a set identity for themselves which is indeed good for encouraging nationalism in a country. However, not changing the teaching practises of a subject nation could mean that Napoleon intended for the annexed subject nations to remain politically weak in the Empire. Learning polish as a language would be essential to the communications between the two countries, by not making French obligatory, Napoleon keeps the annexed states in a position of dependency on France for communication. Ultimately, the interpretations support the view that the subjects under Napoleon?s Empire did not merely gain little benefits and instead were offered great benefits that were utilised by the subject states. Interpretations C and D view the benefits generally as something that would not be truly appreciated till after the fall of the first French Empire. Interpretations A and B share the view that for the Empire to offer benefits, it had to have several drawbacks, such as certain states not having the Civil Code fully imposed and Napoleon putting his social and dynastic motives before the well being of the subject state. However, this does not change the fact that benefits were offered. Interpretations C and D proved to be the most useful for deciding if Napoleon did only offer little benefit to subjects after 1804, with C proving to be the more useful of the two. Interpretations A and B only concentrated on the benefits that were offered directly by being part of the Empire and not other indirect benefits. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a very strong response with good interpretation of the complexities in the sources and a sense of balance. The subtle differences in argument are well understood and knowledge is used to evaluate evidence. There could have been a little more consideration of provenance. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 06/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Weakness of the Directory was the main reasons for Napoleons rise to Power. ...

    5 star(s)

    Napoleon's strengths also were a factor in his rise to power, as he was popular amongst the army. He allowed them to do whatever they wanted while away on campaigns, mainly the Italian Campaign, rape and pillage, however more importantly loot and steal form the conquered regions as this gave

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    The League's predicament was as follows; Britain, France and Italy had formed the Stresa Front in 1935 against Hitler, and this acted as dissuasion against any serious sanctions. In reality, it would have been very easy for Britain to stop Mussolini if they had starved him of oil.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

    4 star(s)

    Speer took a range of initiatives in arms production which subsequently resulted in a dramatic rise in ammunition production, tank production and total arms production. Therefore in regards to production, Speer had some very large successes within his economic policies.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    Calonne proposed to recast the tax system by abolishing the vingtimes (common tax) and substituting it for a permanent 'territorial subvention' or a land tax. There were to be no exemptions, such as was enjoyed by the clergy. From this reform Calonne expected an increase in revenue or income to help pay off bad debt.

  1. Why Did Napoleon fall from Power in 1814?

    This fact then contributed to the loss of political control within France itself. Worried, the French government and people were no longer willing to support Napoleon. They were tired of war (which had been continuous from 1795). Without an army, Napoleon had no power, as he had relied on the

  2. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    In fact during the 1930's Russia was beating its European Competitors in the output of produce, a huge step considering that during the 1900's they were a disgrace to Europe. Another group of effects are the Political effects. This links with the economic effects and the Social effects because it

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    due to its defeat, clearly had great influence on what became Germany as we know it today. Although Austria and Germany were unified under the Nazis, Austria is still not a part of the Germany with which we are so familiar, the Kleindeutschland.

  2. Was Rasputin to blame for the fall of the Romanov dynasty?

    In his early years Russia was an unhappy place, there were strikes, crop failures, famine, riots and widespread protests against Tsarist oppression. Partly to distract the people from these problems but also partly because of a row over land in the Far East, Russia and Japan went to war in 1904.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work