• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vietnam Assignment – History Sources Question

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Vietnam Assignment - History Sources Question 1. Source A tells us many reasons why America would be interested in helping South Vietnam overrun the north, Kennedy had to make out that Vietnam was economically very important and that it would be extremely beneficial to America. He told the civilians that it would be well worth public backing and would be the best thing that America could possibly do with its money. In truth Vietnam was of very little economic importance the only reason that Kennedy was interested in conquering Vietnam was because Kennedy wanted to prevent the "Red tide of communism" overflowing throughout Southeast Asia to all neighbouring countries like Burma and Thailand this was expressed as the domino theory. Similarly Kennedy thought that if he could turn them away from this idea then the other countries would follow suite. Kennedy thought that communism was the first stage in the country being lead in hateful dictatorship. In reality the world wouldn't suffer greatly if Vietnam turned communist. 2. Sources B and C tell us contrasting information about the reasons why the US got involved in Vietnam as they are taken from very different sources source B is from a governmental US state department statement and source C is from a volunteer fighter called Phillip Caputo. Source B tells us that a Vietnam communist has set out to conquer a neighbouring state full of people who are under sovereign rule having a king or queen. To combat this, the American government decided that the situation is no different to Korea in the 1950's when the north decided to take the south. ...read more.

Middle

Source G is very much similar to source F in the way that maybe not all people voted and had their say. It also tells us that the American public were thinking very strongly about the situation in Vietnam. It also in not perfect it does have limits to how useful as a source it can be as it does not contain any details. The Source doesn't have any percentages and or figures or even what was voted in second place and how far behind it was. On face value the source shows that the public only had one thing in their mind. If details where contained i.e. how many votes; we could establish much more information about how strongly they felt and if their views were changing as time went on. The article published in Time magazine in January 1970 was about an incident in 1968 involving a couple of US soldiers killing a group of Vietnamese unarmed innocent women and children. The report was delayed from 1968 until 1970, there are many different reasons why the magazine would want to delay the release of such a gruesome story. One of those reasons could be that the magazine producers didn't want to make a couple of members of there own force (US) look like cold-hearted fiends. Another more probable reason is that when the story broke in 1968 the magazine delayed the production of the article because in 1968 most American citizens were very interested in the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

I feel that had the US won the war the author of source M wouldn't have been so inclined to jump on the television as a cause of heavy losses. I think that he or she would probably agree with the author of source M. The good citizens of America had never seen footage of this sort. They had never had such good coverage of a war, it was vastly different from that seen in World War II. This great coverage wasn't only on television, the pictures also made there way back to the people like the My Lai picture in source J. This sort of picture would also turn the American people against the war as it showed the ruthless American Soldiers at their worst. About this time there were stories that leaked from the government to the press this went someway to distress the public further. These people were now in a position were they could doubt the government and accuse them of lies with visible proof and not just rumours. In this war the added television was one step to far for the people they now knew more than they could handle and it drove them to rebel. Many US people protested against the war. The television companies were quick to jump on these as major stories and covered these events in detail. In many cases people saw the protests and decided that they felt the same way, many people joined in such protests. This spelled disaster for the government as the more protesters the quicker that they must act. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    World War One Sources Question

    3 star(s)

    To drive the Germans out of France the British and French had to attack. Unfortunately for them trench warfare favoured the defenders not the attackers. The only way in which the attacking armies could achieve a victory in trench warfare was to achieve a breakthrough.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Sources Question

    This war they were now fighting was very different to the expectation and formerly normal "set-piece" battles were very rare. This source was written by a volunteer who fought in Vietnam so his feelings were very likely to be the same as many young Americans at the time.

  1. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    They were losing their own troops by using napalm. This was another important factor for why Napalm wasn't effective to win the war. In addition, America didn't win the war; this proves that the Agent Orange and napalm wasn't very effective to win the war.

  2. American History.

    to be equal representation (2 senators, but they would vote as individuals, not as a block). - On the whole, congressional powers were more limited than in the VP but more flexible than in the NJP. The executive was given primary responsibility for foreign affairs and was designated the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

  1. Armed forces.

    Grimm's fairy tales 1813 English East India company loses monopoly Jane Austin's Pride and prejudice 1814 Treaty of Ghent ends war 1815 Receives Cape Colony and naval bases at Congress of Vienna; British East India Company take Ceylon from the Dutch Waterloo End of Napoleonic war; Congress of Vienna 1816

  2. The Vietnam War – G.C.S.E. History Coursework

    The plus points of this source would be that it shows two sides of the argument for and against continuation of the war. And that it shows us that the doves are the minority group. The limitations however are that what is said may be part of a speech and

  1. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    She has torn off her clothes to try to escape injury. The publicity of this photograph turned people from all across the world against the Vietnam War. An international protest began to stop the war in Vietnam from continuing. Napalm burst into flames on impact.

  2. Evaluation of key sources to address the question of increased tension

    The plane is a 'spy' plane, designed by the US to covertly photograph the Soviet Union, this shows little trust and an obvious increase in tension, America was invading Soviet airspace without permission. One flight by a U2 spy plane was unsuccessful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work