• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vietnam Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study sources 1 and 2. What do these sources tell us about the attitude to war in Vietnam? The two sources are very significant in revealing the attitudes to war, as in source 1 it reveals the coalition of early opposition to the war, this included from Pacifies and left-wingers anxious for a Vietcong victory and liberals who preferred a democratic strategy to safeguard Vietnam. When the war started only a small number of Americans population opposed the war (25,000 people took place in the anti-war demonstration but it was the largest of its type up to date). Source 2 is a graph which clearly shows the correlation in the decline of support for the war with the concomitant increase in the opposition to the war. The graph indicates a deterioration for those who supported the war from 50% to around 26% while the opposition increased dramatically from 25% up to 60%. Question 2 Study sources 3 and 4. Do you think it would be true to say that "all U.S politicians supported America's involvement in the Vietnam war". Back up your answer with evidence from the sources. ...read more.

Middle

The utility is helped by the fact that it is a visual snap shot of history. The photograph is a contemporary picture taken on the 4th May. In the photograph we see what appears to be a grenade or tear gas. In addition it seems that the two groups are at battle with each other. We are under the impression that the National Guards have drawn banonets and rifles. Source 8 is beneficial because of the immediacy of the evidence and we can empathize with visual evidence like this easily. It allows us to comprehend complex political concerns like the anti-war movement in an accessible form, conversely we must be cautious of accepting this evidence at face value as photos can be staged of even air brushed for propaganda reasons. Source 9 is a speech by Nixon on the 1st of May (three days before the Kent State confrontation). In this extract Nixon describes the campus students as "BUMS" and not worthy of respect, unlike those soldiers in Vietnam. It is possible that the National Guards were influenced preconditioned towards violence in opposition to the student by the speech. ...read more.

Conclusion

Conversely, Adam Garfinkle, who also opposed the war believed that the movement prolonged the war because the everyday American weren't willing to be associated with the undesirables who opposed the war. Accordingly to sources 16 and 17 media gave weight to the Anti-War Movement. Robin Day is convinced that "blood looks very red on colour television screens", implying that this added momentum to the opposition of war. On the other hand, knightly argues, based on the Newsweek survey that "64% of viewers replied that they were moved to support the soldiers and 24% to oppose war". Finally in source 18, Summers, a combat Colonel in Vietnam, placed responsibility for the loss of Vietnam firmly on the government's lack of resolve to "win the damn war or get the hell out" and he marginalizes contribution of protestors. Having reviewed all the arguments in the sources I believe that the Anti-War Movement had a significant impact on ending the war as it was a dramatic time in American History, and many people relied on their government to make the right choices. As the government wasn't doing so it was the responsibility of those who disagreed with the war to take a stand and put pressure on the government to withdraw from the war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Micheal McAughey History Course Work 12A ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    This source might not be biased because it has been written by an American Journalist, whereas the information is from the Vietnamese, therefore it can possibly a balanced source. Overall I would say this source is fairly reliable. SOURCE G Source G has also been written by Seymor Hersh who wrote source F.

  2. WW1 Sources Question: War Recruitment Propaganda.

    Both sources reinforce the pro-war euphoria in Britain. Source H is an honest account of the front line, which would undermine the pro-war fever in Britain and could have been written after 1916.6)Sources J and I portray two very different images of conditions in the trenches.

  1. The Role and Importance of the Media in Vietnam

    Secondly, it shows the Administration's tactics of "news management": everything that appeared in the press was based on official press releases; no journalist was allowed to talk to any of the members of the Maddox or to read any of the messages sent to or from the Maddox.

  2. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    Therefore, he could not fully express his ideas and feelings towards the whole situation, only parts that were for the USSR. 3) In source I Admiral William Leahy suggests that the use of nuclear weapons against Japan was wrong. To what extent do the sources support this interpretation?

  1. American History.

    - The Wilmot Proviso majorly untied the South in support of the Mexican war, even more than at the beginning. Calhoun led their new position, which was that the territories belonged to all the states and that the gov't was therefore powerless to stop slavery's spread there [Fifth Amendment right

  2. Bowling for Columbine - Reviewed.

    took a back seat while military became #1 priority. Moore effectively shows us how easy it is for human emotions to be played with and fears to be capitalized on. All praise to Moore for tapping into the average American's life and pinpointing the effects of politics in there.

  1. Anzacs and the Gallipoli Campaign of 1915. How useful are the views of the ...

    Source C is an extract from a diary from a person in the Gallipoli campaign. It has a very positive view of the Australians; "...fine to watch...great to watch them...unaffected by bullets...faces were set...determined faces..." This is a view of a person who wrote a diary of the Australians in Gallipoli, during the campaign.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    it was a less violent way of showing what war was like, in a humorous manner. Again, after the war had ended more films were released. Some were to get any patriotism, which was lost, back, and others were to do the opposite. One of these films was called Taxi-Driver.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work