• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vietnam Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 3- Source based questions a) Does source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an immediate effect on the number of US troops on S.Vietnam? Source A shows that there were major anti-war protests in the US in November 1965 and a larger one in Washington in May 1970. In source C it shows in 1966, after the first shown protest, there was a massive increase in combat troops committed to S.Vietnam from 60,000 in 1965 to 268,000 in 1966. So initially source C does not show that the anti-war protests had any effect. However, Source C shows after 1970 there was a dramatic decrease in the number of troops in Vietnam, from 415,000 in 1970 to 239,000 in 1971. Source A supports the original claim also because it shows in December of 1970 the US strength was reduced to 335,800 troops in Vietnam. My own knowledge tells me Operation Rolling Thunder began in 1965 and many US troops were needed for this. Also there was still a chance of a speedy end to the war in 1965 and the US policy was to win the war outright. As a result of this there was an increase of troops even after the peace protest quoted in source C. However, by 1970 the peace movement in America was massive. President Nixon was elected to office on the promise of getting America out of Vietnam. ...read more.


Agent Orange was also used on vegetation. It was a herbicide that could strip trees of their leaves and wipe out whole areas of greenery. IT was sprayed from planes over vast areas and was used to uncover Vietcong positions and expose the Ho Chi Minh trail. Source M supports this and shows an area of Vietnam before and after being sprayed by Agent Orange. The second picture shows a bare landscape stripped of all vegetation, showing Agent Orange was effective in it's objective. Although these chemicals were effective in their missions, they caused very bad side effects: When Napalm came into contact with humans (mainly Vietnamese civilians) it clung to the skin and burned holes into it, massively disfiguring the person. Although the US weren't too concerned with this, American TV broadcasted pictures of children hit by Napalm and the American public were horrified. Source K is a famous example of this, showing children trying to escape from US Napalm bombing. Many people disagreed with the American tactic of using chemicals to strip the jungle as is supported by Source L which talks about the criticism Agent Orange received. It destroyed food and cash crops, adding to the food shortage in Vietnam. It caused cancers and other diseases among Americans and Vietnamese alike. All these things culminated with the bad press on Napalm and were a major factor in widening the peace movement and turning the American people against the war in Vietnam. ...read more.


These sources together are a big indicator of another reason why the American public disliked the war. Sources N and P deal with the Anti-war movement specifically. In N, the headline reads 'AMERICA VOTES FOR PEACE'. This shows peace was a big bargaining tool for presidential candidates and therefore it was realised how unpopular the war was and that America should get out at all costs. Source P basically backs this up but gives more reasons, such as drug addiction and inflation for reasons why the war was so unpoplar. Whatever the reason, the consequence was that the American people went a long way to lose the war for their own country but, in their view, win the war for humanity. All the sources do help to a large extent to understand why a superpower like the United States of America failed to defeat the Viet Cong but it must be couple with my own knowledge to give it any sort of gravity. My own knowledge gives me a number of reasons why America lost the war: Largely the Peace Movement, where the American public turned against the war spectacularly and pressured the American power base to stop the war by electing Nixon, a 'peace candidate'. Russia and China supplied much needed arms and equipment to the NVA and Vietcong. The Americans were not used to the terrain and guerilla warfare but the Vietcong knew these things well. American soldiers were often young, inexperienced, homesick and prone to drug addiction. All these things contributed to America losing the war in Vietnam. BEN SELLERS. 7/1/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    One such image is the world famous photo of the young girl, Him Phuc, running down the street, skin burned by an American napalm attack. These images were a product of the massive media presence that existed in Vietnam during the war.

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    The rise in Balkan nationalism would lead to an uprising, which in turn, would need to be crushed. Austria - Hungary moved to suppress a Slavic rising in 1914, which brought Russia into the equation. The First World War was, most certainly, a war of allies.

  1. US Policy towards Vietnam 1960-73

    Johnson and many others at the time of the cold war saw communism as one entity not realizing Ho Chi Minh was a communist because he was a nationalist. The overall strategy of Guerrilla Warfare is to involve the enemy in a drawn out war.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    VC demolished many of the fortified villages anyway. Source K is a table showing the results of an Australian public opinions poll during the periods April 1969, October 1969 and October 1970. This source tells me that between the periods April 1969 and October 1969 the majority of the public who wanted soldiers to return home increased.

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    This questions the source, is it really reliable? Or is it what the Soviet Union wanted to hear from its own people? It was published in 1984, and this was the period known as the 'new Cold War'. This was due to many incidents occurring around the world which involved both powers.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    As well as using sources that I have mentioned, I also decided that in order to give even more evidence and help back up my points I should use my own knowledge. Therefore, I have got three of my own pictures which I found on the internet regarding the Vietnam

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    So, too, young people turned to new leaders and values and sought unorthodox dress, recreations, and morals. Traditional WASP (white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant) America fought the new ways. The adoption of PROHIBITION in 1919 (with ratification of the 18TH AMENDMENT) had been a victory of Yankee moral values over those of

  2. History of the United States

    What fascinated Americans was the so-called baby boom--a huge increase in the birthrate (the population was at 150 million by 1950 and 179 million by 1960)--and the need to house new families and teach their children. In the presence of rapidly rising inflation, labor unions called thousands of strikes, leading

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work