• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vietnam Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 3- Source based questions a) Does source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an immediate effect on the number of US troops on S.Vietnam? Source A shows that there were major anti-war protests in the US in November 1965 and a larger one in Washington in May 1970. In source C it shows in 1966, after the first shown protest, there was a massive increase in combat troops committed to S.Vietnam from 60,000 in 1965 to 268,000 in 1966. So initially source C does not show that the anti-war protests had any effect. However, Source C shows after 1970 there was a dramatic decrease in the number of troops in Vietnam, from 415,000 in 1970 to 239,000 in 1971. Source A supports the original claim also because it shows in December of 1970 the US strength was reduced to 335,800 troops in Vietnam. My own knowledge tells me Operation Rolling Thunder began in 1965 and many US troops were needed for this. Also there was still a chance of a speedy end to the war in 1965 and the US policy was to win the war outright. As a result of this there was an increase of troops even after the peace protest quoted in source C. However, by 1970 the peace movement in America was massive. President Nixon was elected to office on the promise of getting America out of Vietnam. ...read more.


Agent Orange was also used on vegetation. It was a herbicide that could strip trees of their leaves and wipe out whole areas of greenery. IT was sprayed from planes over vast areas and was used to uncover Vietcong positions and expose the Ho Chi Minh trail. Source M supports this and shows an area of Vietnam before and after being sprayed by Agent Orange. The second picture shows a bare landscape stripped of all vegetation, showing Agent Orange was effective in it's objective. Although these chemicals were effective in their missions, they caused very bad side effects: When Napalm came into contact with humans (mainly Vietnamese civilians) it clung to the skin and burned holes into it, massively disfiguring the person. Although the US weren't too concerned with this, American TV broadcasted pictures of children hit by Napalm and the American public were horrified. Source K is a famous example of this, showing children trying to escape from US Napalm bombing. Many people disagreed with the American tactic of using chemicals to strip the jungle as is supported by Source L which talks about the criticism Agent Orange received. It destroyed food and cash crops, adding to the food shortage in Vietnam. It caused cancers and other diseases among Americans and Vietnamese alike. All these things culminated with the bad press on Napalm and were a major factor in widening the peace movement and turning the American people against the war in Vietnam. ...read more.


These sources together are a big indicator of another reason why the American public disliked the war. Sources N and P deal with the Anti-war movement specifically. In N, the headline reads 'AMERICA VOTES FOR PEACE'. This shows peace was a big bargaining tool for presidential candidates and therefore it was realised how unpopular the war was and that America should get out at all costs. Source P basically backs this up but gives more reasons, such as drug addiction and inflation for reasons why the war was so unpoplar. Whatever the reason, the consequence was that the American people went a long way to lose the war for their own country but, in their view, win the war for humanity. All the sources do help to a large extent to understand why a superpower like the United States of America failed to defeat the Viet Cong but it must be couple with my own knowledge to give it any sort of gravity. My own knowledge gives me a number of reasons why America lost the war: Largely the Peace Movement, where the American public turned against the war spectacularly and pressured the American power base to stop the war by electing Nixon, a 'peace candidate'. Russia and China supplied much needed arms and equipment to the NVA and Vietcong. The Americans were not used to the terrain and guerilla warfare but the Vietcong knew these things well. American soldiers were often young, inexperienced, homesick and prone to drug addiction. All these things contributed to America losing the war in Vietnam. BEN SELLERS. 7/1/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    This was not good, as the very people they were trying to protect from the Viet Cong did not support them. This was a major failure of the Americans. Source E also shows how the Viet Cong were told to act just like the South Vietnamese civilians, "move like fish

  2. World War One Sources Questions

    give two very different opinions about Haig for a number of different reasons. Source D is taken from a book, which focuses on the great wars of World War 1, not the military commanders. In this source we find the Authors personal opinion on why Haig acted as he did.

  1. American History.

    - Furthermore, the colonists spread out over the years, founding Connecticut (1636), New Haven (1638), and New Hampshire (1638). But migration inevitably led to conflicts with the Indians. For instance, the first colonists to move to Connecticut under Thomas Hooker faced the Pequots, who realized that the arrival of the

  2. The Origins of the First World War - Sources Questions

    At this meeting, Admiral von Tirpitz told the Kaiser that the navy would be ready for another 18 months. The meeting took place in September 1912. 18 months later, World War I began in the summer of 1914. Fischer thought this to be much more than a coincidence.

  1. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    Kissinger called this 'jugular diplomacy' + 1969-71 -US Airforce dropped 2,539,743 million tons of bombs = more than total of WWII + 1969-70 -3,630 secret B52 bombing raids on neutral Cambodia targetting the Ho Chi Minh Trail. -LAOS - 4500 bombing raids/month in 1969 increased to 12500 - 15000/month in

  2. Vietnam Assignment – History Sources Question

    The News-week article (source F) does unfortunately fail to mention the amount of people who voted on this issue, the magazine article may have been made out of one hundred votes and not the vast majority of American citizens like we are lead to believe.

  1. US Policy towards Vietnam 1960-73

    After the generals had Diem overthrown they killed him. Kennedy was doubtful about US Involvement in Vietnam now and was even considering withdrawing support & aid. However before any of these plans could come to fruition, on the 22nd November 1963 Kennedy whilst visiting Dallas was assassinated.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    In Nov., 1974, the US army formally released a report on its investigation of the incident. Overall this source and my own knowledge partially agree with the statement that colour television was an important reason to why the United States lost the war in Vietnam.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work