• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vietnam - Why did the USA withdraw it's troops in 1973?

Extracts from this document...


VIETNAM COURSEWORK WHY DID THE USA WITHDRAW ITS TROOPS IN 1973? Vietnam has not always been a united country. In 1954 it was divided between North and South. U.S involvement, as far as troops were concerned, lasted from 1964 until 1973. The reasons why the U.S became involved were that, the war was a civil war between communist North Vietnam, which was supported by China and the Soviet Union, and 'free' South Vietnam backed mainly by the USA. The USA, which had been fighting in Vietnam since 1964, was the world's richest country, with the largest economy, and the most powerful military machine. Despite this, the superpower of the world was still unable to defeat the 3rd rate South - an East Asian country. This was the first war the USA had ever lost, and in 1973 the USA officially pulled out of Vietnam. This essay will focus on why President Nixon pulled out the troops by 1973. The type of war being fought by the USA in Vietnam was unwinnable. The war was a guerrilla war, mainly against the Vietcong. The Vietcong fought in small groups and used their knowledge of their own countryside to hide from the Americans and to pick the places where they themselves wanted to fight. The guerrilla army was split into cells; the cells worked together, but didn't have much knowledge of each other, because this meant if any were captured and tortured, they would not give away too much information. The guerrilla's used the peasant villages as their bases, and went out into the jungle. They attacked units of the ARVN, and ambushed patrols of American soldiers, then disappeared back into the jungle. When the American's arrived, there was no sign of the enemy. Out in the jungle, the guerrilla's never chose to fight unless they were certain of winning. They often attacked small enemy patrols, usually at night, thus making the American's suffer a terrible ordeal. ...read more.


Because of the sabotage the Americans had caused to their country, the Vietnamese quickly viewed them as just another group of foreign invaders - like the Chinese, French, and Japanese before them. Even though the Vietcong were causing the same disruption, at least they were from the same villages, regions, and country as the people, and understood what the people of Vietnam really wanted. In March 1965, under 'Operation Rolling Thunder', the Americans began the bombing of North Vietnam. Its aim was to destroy the economy of the North, and stop the support for guerrillas in the South. The bombing was only intended to last for eight weeks, but instead lasted for eight years; during this time 8 million bombs were dropped, which was over three times the number of bombs dropped in the whole of WW2. The Americans expected the saturation bombing of North Vietnamese cities (such as Hanoi), to result in the North wishing for peace; the bombing actually had the opposite effect though, as it just made the North even more determined to continue. The missions were dangerous for U.S jets and B52 bombers, due to the effective civil defence systems, and defensive batteries of anti-aircraft guns including SAM (surface to air missiles). The effect of the bombing was limited, as most of Vietnam was still a rural based society, and supplies or weapons, food, medicines etc still came from China and the Soviet Union - this meant that even if the Americans destroyed some factories, they would never stop the North's supplies. The North Vietnamese used American bombing as a way of motivating their population to keep fighting, as it was a means of increasing anti-American feelings through the use of effective propaganda. They influenced strong feelings of hatred against the Americans, and told them stories about the Americans, which were often either exaggerated or lies. The more the Americans attacked, the harder the North fought back. ...read more.


Voting is extremely important, as no president in a democracy can hope to keep power if he follows a policy that is universally disliked by the electorate. Nixon had got to power by promising to get the US out of the war and securing 'peace with honour'. It was now time to deliver his promise. There was strong congressional opposition. The Left (Democratic Party) fundamentally opposed the war, whereas the right (Republican Party) fundamentally opposed losing he war. With on the ground troop numbers decreasing, the Democratic dominated congress was inevitably about to stop any further funding for the war. Nixon got the peace terms signed in January 1973 through a combination of Diplomatic and Military pressure. Some said that the 'peace with honour' had been obtained, and this was argued favourably. This was the case, as in 1973, the South Vietnamese were left with the world's fourth largest air force and an army of a million, which were equipped with the latest American technology. The Communists, in contrast, were a depleted force that was low on men, weapons, ammunition, and food. However, without the much-needed American support, it was uncertain how much longer the South of Vietnam would last. In conclusion, the USA pulled out of Vietnam in 1973, due to the fact they were fighting the wrong type of war in the wrong place at the wrong time, the public support for the war in Vietnam declined the longer it went on, politically and financially the war became a loser for both politicians and political parties in the USA, and finally the American image in the world had greatly suffered because of it's involvement in Vietnam. Many American officials had been looking to get out of Vietnam as early as 1968. The Vietnamization of the war, which was Nixon's policy, lead to the gradual removing of the US troops, until by 1973 all the US troops were out of Vietnam. The Paris peace treaty was signed, and the US involvement came to an end when the last US troops left Saigon in April 1973. Vietnam Coursework 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    The Vietnam War was one of these wars and the overwhelming presence of young inexperienced soldiers, fresh out of training was clear throughout the War. Young men often lied about their ages Do you have proof of this? If so, give a source.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    Most of the villagers were also at home so the roads were empty making it easier for men and vehicles to be moved more quickly to the battlefield areas. This may have been one of the biggest blunders that the Arabs had made and should have considered this point, which they obviously didn't.

  1. Describe the military tactics and weapons used by both the USA and the Vietcong ...

    to the tunnels most of the time, the Americans used chemical bombs. Napalm. It was basically jellied petrtol and was used to burn off leaves and vegetation in forests. It stuck to its victims causing horrific burns. To add to this, they also used more chemical weapons: Agents Orange and Blue- weedkillers basically.

  2. Explain why the US withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973?

    between 1969 and 1971, in which time the USA reduced the numbers of troops in Vietnam from 500,000 to 140,000, but when the NVA made a large scale attack the ARVN crumbled under the pressure and the remaining troops felt there was little point in risking their lives.


    The Arab aim of this war was to destroy the new Jewish state and reinstate a Palestinian government, thus there would be a complete Arab presence in the Middle East. However, due to the loss that they achieved in the war this aim was to become their mission through out the years to come.

  2. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    It is these factors that lead me to believe that Guerilla tactics played such a big role in the US defeat. It appears that many of the other reasons for US defeat were caused, partly of wholly by the relentless use of guerilla tactics.

  1. Was the My Lai Massacre a failure in the Rules of Engagement or a ...

    On March 16th, 1968, at about 8:00 Am, three platoons called the Charlie Company moved into the Quang Ngai Province, close to the Hamlets of My Lai 4. They were carrying out their Search and Destroy mission meaning they had to search for Vietcong, arrest them and destroy their weapons, ammunition, food, and shelter.

  2. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    organised the village's defences, helped to reorganise agriculture into co-operatives even setting up schools and medical dispensaries in some villages. The NFL/VC helped the peasants whereas SV gov't only exploited them. -urban dwellers also suffered economically because of the war and corruption - cost of living increased 170% between 1965 and 1967.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work