• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vladimir Lenin was the Bolshevik leader

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Vladimir Lenin was the Bolshevik leader. He was a clever thinker and a practical man; he knew how to take advantage of events. When Lenin arrived in Russia, he issued a document called the April theses, promising 'peace, bread, land and freedom'. He called for an end to the 'Capitalist' war, and demanded that power should be given to the soviets. He demanded a revolution against the Provisional Government as soon as possible. In November 1917, under the leadership of Lenin and Trotsky, the Bolsheviks overthrew the Provisional government, beginning the era of Communist rule in Russia. Stalin played no real part in the events of the revolution. The revolution was the result of detailed Bolshevik planning, and of the failures and weaknesses of the Provisional government. Lenin knew that there was enough discontent amongst the people for a revolution to work. By October 1917 the Bolsheviks controlled both the Petrograd and the Moscow Soviets. ...read more.

Middle

Yet it was Joseph Stalin who was eventually to emerge as leader of the party. This was largely because Stalin was a clever and astute politician, who was seen as being a man of the people. He was able to manoeuvre himself into a position of power through his role as General Secretary of the Communist Party. Once in power, he exerted an iron grip on the USSR. Stalin's aims differed from Lenin's in that he did not expect to spread Communism worldwide until Communism was secure in the USSR. He also wanted to achieve autarky in agriculture (via the Kolkhoz) and industry via the Five Year Plans. The state took over planning for industry and agriculture with a commission called Gosplan to set targets for achievement. A five year plan set targets for all basic industrial factories and workers. The first five year plan concentrated on heavy industry, the second five year plan was similar to the first, but also developed transport and mining and the third five year plan put more emphasis on light industry, housing and consumer goods. ...read more.

Conclusion

The political system which existed in the Soviet Union under Stalin was a system of terror. The purges of the 1930s sent millions of Russians to their deaths, the population was scared of the secret police, the NKVD, and the forced collectivization of agriculture had wiped out a part of Russian society, the Kulaks. Due to Stalin's Purges the army and navy were seriously weakened by the loss of senior officers; however in Lenin's time in Russia he used war communism to help feed and strengthen the army. Stalin's dictatorship can be compared to Adolf Hitler as they ran everything by themselves and did whatever they felt like, even though others objected. Lenin was clearly had a greater impact on Russia as he was the one who contributed the most to the Revolution's and he got the Bolsheviks into power. He also helped to modernise Russia. Stalin was a dictator and he did not do as much as Lenin to help Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    He was always rude to them yet it didn't matter. There was such fear in Stalin's party that nobody dared to go against him. Lenin and Stalin were different in many ways. Unlike Lenin, Stalin was never happy. Stalin executed or dismissed anyone who was suspicious and in the end anyone who seemed to have fun was got rid of.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    land, which is why Lenin felt it necessary to include this in his thesis. The fact that the Government did not represent the whole nation was another of its downfalls. Lenin emphasized that the Bolsheviks would not support the Provisional Government and refused to share power with it as the Petrograd Soviet had.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    forming a homogeneous ministry, made up of the Socialist parties, from the Bolsheviks to the Socialists-Populists inclusive. Faced with the prospect of food supplies to Petrograd being cut off, the Bolsheviks consented to negotiate with Vikzhel, although not, it would seem, in particularly good faith.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Do you agree with this statement? After the revolution of 1917 which saw the fall of tsarist and system of autocracy a Provisional government was set up was set up, consisting of members of the tsar's forma Duma or representative assembly.

  1. To what extent did Lenin's legacy leave the Bolshevik party in a vibrant and ...

    This altogether inevitabily sparked hostilities and a Civil War began in the Spring of 1918. From the evidence above it is easy to see why some Historians even argue that Lenin wanted a war in 1918. For example Dominic Liven said 'The civil war did not occur by accident...

  2. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    a major attack on the Germans which ended in a terrible defeat for the Russians. This event led to a huge demonstration in Petrograd, known as the July Days. On the 16th and 17th of July, soldiers, sailors and workers all came onto the streets in protest of the war.

  1. The Bolshevik revolution

    " The humiliating conditions angered many because this was not the "peace without annexations and indemnities as promised," and "for what purpose had millions given their lives? " Lenin had to continually walk a political tightrope, and his decisions often infuriated a country who had little patience after four years of war.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    No clear objectives. 4. No cost analysis. 5. No realistically targeted resources. 6. Impact of re-allocation of resources ignored. 7. No attention paid to the difficulties the plan might face. 8. Many imperfections of the plan not analysed and fixed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work