• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"War became inevitable by 1939 and, when it came, it was a surprise to hardly anyone." Assess the validity of this view.

Extracts from this document...


"War became inevitable by 1939 and, when it came, it was a surprise to hardly anyone." Assess the validity of this view. Historical debate surrounding the war has provided various interpretations of its causes and origins, some of particular relevance to the view in question. The inevitability of the war - how far it was inevitable, and if it was at which point it became so - is a point of contention which depends upon the view one takes of many other factors: for example, if one took the intentionalist view of Hitler's role in the war as "master-planner", one would view war in 1939 as inevitable because it was planned by Hitler; if one were a Marxist historian one might view the incidence of the war as "historically inevitable" in much the same way that Khrushchev in Source A takes the view that the Nazi-Soviet Pact was historically inevitable, although perhaps not for entirely the same reasons. Later historiography, particularly after AJP Taylor's Origins of the Second World War, would dispute the "inevitability" of war in 1939 and certainly the idea that Hitler was a master-planner - for if he were not, actions by other powers perhaps may have prevented war at that point; or perhaps ...read more.


Indeed the Soviet Union did precisely that and got "the best terms they could for themselves" when they agreed to carve up Poland with Germany in 1939. That Britain and France did decide to guarantee Poland's security and did decide in September 1939 to honour that guarantee thus appears by this account to have been the immediate cause for war in 1939. If, then, there was a real possibility of Britain and France not doing so (and since they had been somewhat content to avoid war in September 1938 by signing away Czechoslovakia's sovereignty at Munich, it would seem there was), then war could not be said to have been entirely inevitable in 1939. Taking the source at face value, then, in this respect the view in question would not (even though the source claims war could only have been avoided in three ways, which suggests a degree of inevitability) appear to be entirely valid. That the war was "a surprise to hardly anyone", however, is very debateable. It implies very strongly that most of the European powers were predicting war by 1939 and were aware of its imminence and inevitability. ...read more.


(The argument Richard Overy puts forward concerning the power balance of Europe is relevant here in explaining that there was a limit to how much of a blow to the European power status quo - which Germany wanted, as in WWI, to surpass - the West would tolerate.) Overall, then, the view is semi-valid; its claims are supported in some ways but contradicted in others (e.g. the claim implies rhetorically that no one was surprised by war and that everyone knew it was going to happen, when Hitler, crucially, probably did not). That war was inevitable by 1939 is arguable, but probably not entirely true purely in the sense that it's difficult to argue that anything was completely inescapable. In the context of the situation at the time, however, what was politically and economically possible (e.g. Britain calculated by 1939 that it could not sustain armaments on the scale it had been for much longer at all, and thus if war was going to happen it had to happen sooner rather than later) made war a far more difficult eventuality to avoid and a far more likely solution to be chosen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "The first world war was the result of long-standing rivalries between the great powers". ...

    In the period from 1880 to 1914, each of the European powers (France, Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) increased their army and military massively. The statistics show that it was Germany that first started to exponentially expand its army, with other countries soon following suit.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    A cynical opportunist and shrewd realist, Goebbels switched to Hitler's side in 1926 and was rewarded with the position of Gauleiter of Berlin. His tremendous success in Berlin, achieved through the brilliant use of propaganda and his oratory (many thought he was as good an orator as Hitler), brought a

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    minister - quite the opposite to what he had intended to achieve. It would seem that Hitler, rather than exploiting a weakness, had instead created one in his opponent. At this point, it appeared to Hitler that Germany may well be able to hold dominance over Austria without even the need for an official annexation.

  2. Vietnam war

    in 1957). * 1950s= SV receives US non- combat support through US Military Advisory Group and later MACV. * Conflict of ideology, nepotism etc. North Vietnam: Political * In 1955, Ho Chi Minh secured an additional $200 million and $100 million in economic aid, from peking and Moscow respectively.

  1. 'At Munich Hitler gained what he wanted and achieved conquest without firing a shot' ...

    hopeless in intervention, however a date for this attack had not been agreed. Differently to Taylor Bullock's work suggests that there is mildly significant evidence suggesting that Germany were making preparations in the event of war breaking out but Bullock does also believe that these were just preparatory measures and

  2. Why did War break out in Europe in 1939?

    China appealed to the league, Japan claimed that it was not invading as an aggressor but simply settling a local difficulty. The Japanese argued that china was in such a state of anarchy that they ad to invade in self-defence to keep peace in the area.

  1. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    that used to work; now it is mainly women, who have never done industrial work before. Besides this flaw, Stalin also made another one as he did initially not listen to the signs of when war was going to break out.

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    When he was finally released from prison, Speer started work on writing an autobiographical book. For several years Speer carried around the image, which he created himself, as an apolitical technocrat who had rejected Nazism although he was Hitler?s architect, Minister of Armaments and friend, and historians accepted his word as an accurate source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work