• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

War is never justifiedIn this essay I shall give a review of the current war on Afghanistan and some of the theories behind it being either just or unjust war.

Extracts from this document...


War is never justified In this essay I shall give a review of the current war on Afghanistan and some of the theories behind it being either just or unjust war. In these time is can be difficult for people to give their honest and pure opinions on war, partly because of their countries allies, enemies and even their personal friends & foes. People living in the United States of America will be influenced by their leaders getting them to go to a war against Afghanistan in which they call: 'War Against Terrorism'. There is one problem with this and that is that you cannot wipe out all the wicked off the world as this is impossible. You may be able to stop a significant amount of it but not all of it, it is just physically impossible. I said at the beginning of this essay that I would go through some of the theories, so here they are: 1. ...read more.


This would be pathetic as the Americans have the Laguna Seca Raceway and it just seems so childish. Anyway, back to the point, this theory has to include two states, one being attacked and the other doing the attacking. The problem with this is that no state attacked America, it was an organisation. So this part of the Just Cause Test has been failed. Now for the second condition. Last Resort This condition states that if all other reasonable (in the eyes of the theory) options have been exhausted then the best option can be taken. It seems debatable that other options have not been exhausted, so another failure. Lawful Authority & Formal Declaration The war must be formally declared to the public and the opposing state. Bin Laden has completely failed this test, but the USA has formally declared their war. This test has been passed with flying colours Right Intention Not only do states have to have a just cause, they must let the public know about it, not just some hidden intention like the imaginary example I gave earlier. ...read more.


Also, utilitarianism requires not just that the results of war be on balance but on the war being the alternative with the best results, which is even more doubtful. Completely failed. Consequentialism According to Consequentialists the key question is: Will the final strategy minimise the bad-effects compared to all the other options? You must consider that all lives are equal. So, if all lives count equally, then a military strategy that kills many more civilians for the sake of a smaller reduction in military casualties on one side cannot be justified on consequentialist justifications. But this is precisely the reason why the US and its allies have used massive air strikes in what they say is the 'first phase' of the war. It seems likely that this strategy does not minimise the bad effects compared to all alternatives and so any consequentialist justification is doubtful. Summing up I believe that there is no such thing as a 'just war' and countries should stop, tidy up and talk, it would save a lot of lives and be a lot more logical, even if it means translating! (c) Zeb Gostelow 10F 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Mao Essay

    as the peasants were so consumed with creating more steel that they abandoned their work on the farms to add more and more to the furnaces, while those that stayed on the land were less productive than before, as they knew that more work would not be in their self-interests.1011

  2. Notes on Pacifism and Just War Theory

    The Society of Friends (Quakers) is against war under any circumstances. They believe that Jesus taught Christians to:' Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you'. However what Jesus is teaching is perhaps not easy to achieve. His words can easily be misinterpreted or ignored. Jesus himself did not actually preach against war.

  1. Only Yesterday by Frederick Lewis Allen - review

    Attendance records were setting new highs and sports figures were as popular as the biggest celebrities. It is rare that a country would catch on to two life-changing crazes at nearly the same time. Can you imagine if the television and computer were both becoming popular in America at the same time?

  2. Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" - review.

    Additionally, the lack of voices makes the actions on screen less human and more tolerable. At the very conclusion, the music cuts out to the sounds of screaming people on September 11th. Moore is trying to prove how wars in other countries "can't be heard" and are thus ignored; however,

  1. Must a defensible theory of the morality of war must integrate moral reasoning with ...

    An example of this is the American intervention in Kuwait after the Iraqi invasion in 1990. The criteria stipulated under jus ad bellum, for just resort to war, are, in addition to just cause, or self-defence; right intention, the proper authorities must take the decision to go to war and

  2. A Review of "Clash of Civilizations?"

    In other words, major conflict will take place on a global level among all of the world's cultures and civilizations and will not be concentrated in one region of the world. "In the post-Cold War world, the most important distinctions among peoples are not ideological, political, or economic.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    However, there were understandings, firstly that elections would be held in all liberated countries, additionally a rather nebulous declaration of self-determination for the said countries. What was not explicitally stated, but nonetheless implicitly understood by all parties was the notion of legitimate spheres of influence, along the lines agreed in

  2. The purpose of my examination of war is to question whether the resort to ...

    Parallel to this argument, I will reject the notion of preventive wars, for I fear that giving the green light to preventive war makes war to frequent and too routine. The Legalist Paradigm, Sovereignty and Self - Defence The United Nations charter requires members to "refrain...from the threat or use

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work