• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

War is never justifiedIn this essay I shall give a review of the current war on Afghanistan and some of the theories behind it being either just or unjust war.

Extracts from this document...


War is never justified In this essay I shall give a review of the current war on Afghanistan and some of the theories behind it being either just or unjust war. In these time is can be difficult for people to give their honest and pure opinions on war, partly because of their countries allies, enemies and even their personal friends & foes. People living in the United States of America will be influenced by their leaders getting them to go to a war against Afghanistan in which they call: 'War Against Terrorism'. There is one problem with this and that is that you cannot wipe out all the wicked off the world as this is impossible. You may be able to stop a significant amount of it but not all of it, it is just physically impossible. I said at the beginning of this essay that I would go through some of the theories, so here they are: 1. ...read more.


This would be pathetic as the Americans have the Laguna Seca Raceway and it just seems so childish. Anyway, back to the point, this theory has to include two states, one being attacked and the other doing the attacking. The problem with this is that no state attacked America, it was an organisation. So this part of the Just Cause Test has been failed. Now for the second condition. Last Resort This condition states that if all other reasonable (in the eyes of the theory) options have been exhausted then the best option can be taken. It seems debatable that other options have not been exhausted, so another failure. Lawful Authority & Formal Declaration The war must be formally declared to the public and the opposing state. Bin Laden has completely failed this test, but the USA has formally declared their war. This test has been passed with flying colours Right Intention Not only do states have to have a just cause, they must let the public know about it, not just some hidden intention like the imaginary example I gave earlier. ...read more.


Also, utilitarianism requires not just that the results of war be on balance but on the war being the alternative with the best results, which is even more doubtful. Completely failed. Consequentialism According to Consequentialists the key question is: Will the final strategy minimise the bad-effects compared to all the other options? You must consider that all lives are equal. So, if all lives count equally, then a military strategy that kills many more civilians for the sake of a smaller reduction in military casualties on one side cannot be justified on consequentialist justifications. But this is precisely the reason why the US and its allies have used massive air strikes in what they say is the 'first phase' of the war. It seems likely that this strategy does not minimise the bad effects compared to all alternatives and so any consequentialist justification is doubtful. Summing up I believe that there is no such thing as a 'just war' and countries should stop, tidy up and talk, it would save a lot of lives and be a lot more logical, even if it means translating! (c) Zeb Gostelow 10F 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Only Yesterday by Frederick Lewis Allen - review

    After the war, the middle generation had "spent themselves and wanted a good time" (95). This good time came in the form of shorter skirts than ever before, petting parties, intimate dances, cosmetics, and foul language. The words "damn" and "hell" became commonplace.

  2. Mao Essay

    Guards, who were serving Mao only.17 This was exactly what Mao had wanted, he didn't want anyone in power who was going to question him and his authority, he personally wanted Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping out of power, as they had previously spoken out about Mao's greatest mistake, the Great Leap Forward18.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    held by the pre revolutionary Russians, dressed up with and made even more lethal by the addition of Marxism.

  2. Vietnam War.

    Called Vietcong, they began launching attacks on US military installations that had been established, and in 1959 began their guerrilla attacks on the Diem government. The attacks were intensified in 1960, the year in which North Vietnam proclaimed its intention "to liberate South Vietnam from the ruling yoke of the US imperialists and their henchmen".

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Seven of the raiding commandos were killed. The exact circumstances of Tony's death remain vague with accounts of Tony and his family being already dead when the Geagea strike force arrived, while other accounts claim that there were two raiding parties with Elie Hobeika leading one of them.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    More importantly, it has shown unwillingness to give in to U.S. unilateral concessions. To Russia, Iran has valued cultural, historical, and religious ties that could help it to control and influence the predominantly Islamic countries that now form along its borders.

  1. A Review of "Clash of Civilizations?"

    In other words, major conflict will take place on a global level among all of the world's cultures and civilizations and will not be concentrated in one region of the world. "In the post-Cold War world, the most important distinctions among peoples are not ideological, political, or economic.

  2. Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" - review.

    Additionally, the lack of voices makes the actions on screen less human and more tolerable. At the very conclusion, the music cuts out to the sounds of screaming people on September 11th. Moore is trying to prove how wars in other countries "can't be heard" and are thus ignored; however,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work