• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

War With Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Claudia Quammen 04-25-03 Political Science War With Iraq President George Bush has stood in front of cameras numerous times and stated that his reasoning for wanting to go to war with Iraq is because Iraq, under the reign of Saddam Hussein refuses to follow the rules that where laid out for them by the UN Security council. Saddam still continued to produce weapons of mass destruction and President Bush urged other countries to be afraid that those weapons would be used against them in a terror attack. Most countries didn't believe that the United States had significant proof of Saddam's continuing efforts to make these weapons, so the Bush administration did some investigating and presented it two or three times to the Security council. The administration wanted to show that not only was Saddam creating these terrible and destructive weapons, but he was actually testing them out on his own people. There were accounts that up to 10,000 people had gone unaccounted for, they seemed to just vanish into thin air never to be heard from again. ...read more.

Middle

There are thousands of thousands of Iraqi soldiers that are thought to be killed during Iraqi Freedom. 157 coalition forces dies, 126 Americans and 31 British troops. An estimated 1,631-1,887 civilians have been killed which is a fraction of the number of civilians that were killed in Dessert Storm back in 1991. George Bush has said time and time again that the reason the American and British troops are fighting and willing to risk their lives, is to rid Iraq of Saddam Hussein and give the country back to the people. I think that with his careful efforts of planning buildings to attack and not to attack, he has been successful in the humanitarian aspect. One failed humanitarian aspect is the dropping of food. The American and British troops wanted to bring in food and water to the people of Iraq that were without. Unfortunately a lot of the fields that the food was being dropped into were covered with mines and the Iraqi people were either killed trying to get the food, or knew better than to try. ...read more.

Conclusion

It also made me wonder what will become of this country we just finished pulverizing? We won the war hands down. We either rid the country of Saddam, or the world. We will now begin the process of building the country back up. But I have to wonder how easy that will be. Will someone come in and take Saddam's place? Will there ever be a civil and just government? And who is going to monitor this? My prediction is that we will keep troops there for a year or two more. I think we will take over the oil (of course that isn't why we were there though) and we will try to Americanize the country of Iraq. I think it will cost our country millions of billions of dollars to do what is necessary to create a peaceful Iraq and to ensure Saddam is gone and never come back. Cooper, Patrick. (2003). Coalition Deaths Fewer Than in 1991. Retrieved April 25, 2003 from http://www.cnn.com Duensing, Jim. (2002). Why Does George W. Bush Hate Saddam Hussein? Retrieved April 25, 2003 from http://www.webleyweb.com/tle/libe186 Smith, Colonel Daniel. (2002). Is the US as War With the World? Retrieved April from http://www.fcnl.org/issues/int/sup/iraq_un-negotiations.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    The absence of any strong democratic system in Iran and the centralisation of power in the hands of the Iranian Supreme Council, who are proven hard line Islamic fundamentalists, give good reason why America and its allies continue to feel threatened. Iraq Iraq now claims that they have no WMD.

  2. Should We Go To War With Iraq? - Discursive Essay

    230,000 American troops arrived in Saudi Arabia to take defensive action, but when Iraq continued a huge military build-up in Kuwait, the President ordered an additional 200,000 troops to be deployed to prepare for a possible offensive action by the U.S.-led coalition forces.

  1. From the ancient land of Iraq emerged complex irrigation systems and the earliest writing. ...

    In July 1979, then President Ahmed Hassan Al-Bakr resigned and handed over the reigns to his chosen successor and vice-president, Saddam Hussein. The latter's dictatorship and control over the media had crippling effects on Iraqi culture and society. Among other things, he persecuted political rivals, intellectuals and minorities such as

  2. History of the United States

    The Federalists, who in the HARTFORD CONVENTION (in Connecticut, 1814) had capped their opposition to the war with demands for major changes in the Constitution, now were regarded as disloyal, and their party dwindled down to a base in New England and in the 1820s dissolved.

  1. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    This brought up major controversy over Iraq and the United States with Great Britain wanting to attack Saddam. However, nothing really occurred and Saddam was left to himself. The war in Iraq all started with the attacks on the twin towers and the pentagon, by the terrorist on September 11th, 2001.

  2. Citizenship Comparing two articles - " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence ...

    Ali by many tabloids, both Chirac and Mr.Ali have gone onto national and global television claiming that a war is unjustified and that America and Britain are just taking out past frustrations these two very public figures taking their point of view to the media has just made Tony Blair and George W.

  1. War With Iraq.

    President Bakr, whose health was deteriorating, had come to depend on Saddam for much of the administrative business of the government. Saddam was angered when Bakr attempted to improve relations with Syria. With Saddam at the helm, Bakr was forced into early retirement, resigning due to "health problems."

  2. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    Bush do the same, only this time pinning the blame firmly on Iraq. Not a news bulletin passes without one of these figures making a offensive comments about each other or trying to justify their reasoning. Rather ironically the largest figure of hate and the man at the centre of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work