• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems he inherited?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Mohsin Akhtar W-RMG Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems he inherited? During the reigns of both Alexander II and Alexander III both faced significant problems. Both rulers inherited some similar problems when they ascended to the throne for example both faced significant opposition, albeit in different forms. For example, at the time of Alexander II?s ascension to the throne opposition was disparate and far away from what it was by the time he was succeeded in 1881 by Alexander III. Problems regarding domestic policy were also inherited by both Tsars as well as problems on the international stage posing difficulties. It would seem that the more successful of the two leaders in dealing with these problems would be Alexander III as he managed to crush the opposition he faced surviving his reign unlike his father as well as being adept at dealing with international issues. The opposition faced was a serious problem that was faced by both Alexander?s. Opposition to Alexander II was largely based on discontent from the serfs and peasantry that had been festering before he came to power. For example there were 1468 serf uprisings since the turn of the century. This group of the population were seen as potentially dangerous to the regime within Russia and as a result Alexander II recognised there was need for change. ...read more.

Middle

writers, teachers, Jews etc. As a result any opposition to Alexander III?s reign was suppressed. It would appear that the measures he introduced allowed him to successful cope with this opposition unlike Alexander II whose reforms caused opposition to develop further. Alexander II came to the power with the backdrop of the Crimean War in 1855. This war had highlighted the various incompetency?s of Russia as a nation, making them appear weak and backward in comparison to the Western European nations. As a result Alexander II saw the need for the introduction of reforms to bring Russia up to date with the West. Aside from the aforementioned Emancipation Act there were various other reforms. He decided that the country needed to develop on an industrial level. In order to do this Alexander II drew up plans for a massive investment in railways. The emancipation, he hoped, would lead to greater agricultural output, in order to finance the railways, and the beginnings of Russia's industrialisation. He also invested in new iron and steel works for armaments and new manufacturing industries. However these plans never came to fruition during his rule with the dissatisfaction amongst the serfs playing a key part to this. Though he may have not been successful in this area the creation of Zemstvos as well as changes to the legal system and education on the surface appeared to bring Russia up to date with Western Democracies. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although they made gains in several areas they took a huge financial hit and had been isolated from the other European superpowers as they allied together. When Alexander II came to power he thus inherited these problems. He however was much more adept at dealing with international affairs than his father and predecessor was. Alexander III proved to be quite the negotiator gaining the title of ?Alexander the Peacemaker?. He aimed at avoiding war at all costs and was tolerant of Otto von Bismarck, a conservative German statesman who dominated European affairs from the 1860s to his dismissal in 1890. Bismarck had a quite belligerent attitude towards Russia, and Alexander II was able to revive the ancient league of 3 emperors in 1884. During his reign as Tsar Alexander had managed to avoid war and create some kind of international security whereas under Alexander II Russia still seemed vulnerable as a result the problems inherited on the international stage were handled more successfully by Tsar Alexander III. In conclusion, it can be seen that Alexander III was more successful than Alexander II in coping with the problems he inherited. Although Alexander II?s handling of domestic policy and modernisation was superior, Alexander III?s ability to successfully get rid of opposition, through things methods such as the Okhrana, and his handling of the international situation make it clear that he was the more successful Tsar in coping with the problems he inherited. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful was Napoleon III?

    This was when France was at the height of her national standing and was on the verge of becoming a great power again. In 1858 Napoleon because he genuinely supported nationalism, as can be seen in his previous involvement in the nationalist revolutions in the northern states in 1830, he

  2. How successful was Alexander II in transforming Russian Society

    Foreign works were permitted and Russia saw far more books and newspapers published, from a meagre 1836/year in 1,855 to 10,691 in 1964. There were new regulations; no longer did every title of a book need to be checked before being published.

  1. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    From 1850 to 1875, the coal production in Russia more than quintupled from 300,000 tonnes to 1,700,000 tonnes. Although this seems like huge progress, Nicholas II had come to power when Russia needed more resources than the other Great Powers, since the Russian Empire was huge but undeveloped, especially in comparison to Britain.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II deserve his title of the Tsar Liberator

    This led to a great improvement in the general literacy of Russia, with the zemstva running almost half of all primary schools by 1914.

  1. To what extent was Alexander III reign reactionary?

    In this crackdown the Okhrana arrested and executed a student called Alexander Ulyanov, also known as the brother of future Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin. Alexander IIIs reactionary policies clearly had a dramatic long-term effect on his own dynasty. In 1918, on Lenin?s orders, Nicholas II and his entire family were murdered by the Bolsheviks.

  2. Compare and contrast the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    However Alexander III did introduce beneficial reforms ? education for young factory children became compulsory, aiding in the development of industry and a generation of educated workers, and ? albeit reluctantly - he introduced university lectures for women. It seemed that both Tsars wanted to further the development of the

  1. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems which faced him on his ...

    Overall there was a feeling of discontent with the reforms as Russian society was now being changed for no apparent reason as the serfs were not freed. Alexander simple transferred control over the peasants from the landlords to the MIR.

  2. How far did Alexander III successfully solve the problems he faced in 1881, by ...

    A major part in this was played by Minister of Finance named Sergie Witte who encouraged foreign investment and placed the Russian robel (Russian currency) on the gold standard. Since there was a lot of pressure that he had to face from some of his advisers in order to reform

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work