• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was appeasement justified?

Extracts from this document...


Was Appeasement Justified? Firstly what was Appeasement? This was the name given to the policy of trying to avoid war by making allowances and sacrifices. It is particularly connected and identified with the British policy towards Hitler in the 1930s to attempt and avoid the Second World War. As we now know this didn't work although it did appear to give Britain, who were clearly far from ready for another war, more time to prepare. So what happened? Well it all began in 1935 when Britain signed the naval agreement with Germany. Britain followed a policy, later known as Appeasement, of giving Hitler what he wanted this was for the following three years after the naval agreement was signed in 1935. There were many British people, including politicians, who were in favour of and agreed with the policy. Although the person most associated with the policy was Neville Chamberlain, he didn't actually become Prime Minister until 1937, two years after the naval agreement was signed. ...read more.


* The attitude of Britain's Empire also affected their view, as Britain weren't sure if their empire and commonwealth states would support a war against Germany. * The USA wouldn't have supported Britain if they stood up to Hitler, as they didn't want to be involved in another war. * Britain's own economic problems were a higher priority as both Britain and France were still suffering from large debt s and huge unemployment as a result of the Depression. * The British and French leaders didn't want to repeat the horrors of the First World War, this meant avoiding another war at almost any cost. * Mainly Britain weren't ready for another war. The British armed forces weren't ready for a war against Hitler at that particular point in time. Appeasement "brought" time for rearmament; at least that is what the following graphs appear to say. Graph one - Compares Britain's (regular army and reserves) army divisions ready to fight with Germany's army divisions ready to fight. ...read more.


They say that to face up to Hitler Chamberlain had to be prepared to take Britain into a war. All the evidence available to Chamberlain told him Britain was not ready. Public opinion was against it - his own civil service advisers had told him this. Important countries in the empire were against it. The USA was against it. And most importantly, Britain's armed forces were not ready anyway. They were badly equipped and had felled far behind the Germans (see the charts previously). After great consideration and summing up both the good and bad points of Appeasement I feel the Appeasement was justified. As I feel that the good points over rule the bad. And you can't be sure that if Britain or France had stood up to Hitler then he would have backed off as you can't go back and change it to find out. Besides Britain would have been destroyed if war had been declared there and then, as they were clearly not prepared or ready. So, was Appeasement justified? I think it was so from my point of view... YES!!! Debbie Lord History 02/01/2003 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Although his policies transformed the USSR from an agrarian-based society into an industrialized nation with a powerful military arsenal, the transformation was accomplished at the cost of millions of lives. Stalin's militant distrust of the West and his assertion of Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe gave rise to the Cold War.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Economic improvement in the winter of 1932 made the Nazis realize that they might lose even more of the protest vote that had made their electoral successes possible. Finally, a minority within the party was critical of Hitler's unwillingness to enter a coalition.

  1. Was appeasement the only option open to Britain in 1938-1939?

    Essentially it was this central belief which shaped the policy of appeasement, preventing British politicians from seeing when the policy was failing in its key objective; the avoidance of war. In its essential make up, appeasement was however a viable option for continuing the peace in Europe but without the

  2. Was Appeasement Justified?

    Churchill also factored and recognised (with others) the Nazi party's danger from the outset. His grand alliance was set up and was a coalition of states based on an Anglo-Franco-Soviet alliance. Fear of war was equalled by fear of revolution though. If the alliance did fight the Nazi's then they would win but victory would risk the

  1. Explain the role of Czechoslovakia in the appeasement story.

    The Germans thought that it was their right to be combined with Austria. Thus Czechoslovakia was now in the jaws of Germany and Austria waiting to be sacrificed. In September 1938 Masaryk died. Masaryk founded the President and founder of Czechoslovakia was generally considered generally considered as the greatest Czech leader ever both domestically and internationally.

  2. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    of appeasement " We have eaten dirt in vain" This statement is clearly expressing the fact that Britain has tolerated the deceitful acts of Germany to no avail or successes. That the policy of appeasement was deemed to fail from the onset.

  1. Apeasement Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the ...

    Especially the Liberal party of the time who were the most consistant critics of the policy. As it became evident that the policy of appeasement had failed in 1939 and that Britain would in fact go to war, the Liberal Leader Sir Archibald Sinclair expressed his feelings on the achievements

  2. Chamberlain's policy of appeasement against Germany

    This essay shall offer analysis on Chamberlain's personal reasons to follow appeasement, the reasons on behalf of Britain and the reasons due to the views of the British public. A description of the course of appeasement will be given, and arguments for and against Chamberlain's use of appeasement against Hitler will be given.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work