• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

was bloody sunday the prime reason for the 1905 revolution

Extracts from this document...


BLOODY SUNDAY WAS THE PRIME REASON FOR THE 1905 REVOLUTION? The events of Bloody Sunday were without a doubt an important part of Russian history as it exposed the spiralling problems the tsar faced, and the hurt of the people. The events of Blood Sunday only aided in aggravating the people and opposition as well as stimulating revolution. But yet on the other hand I still do not believe this was the prime cause for the 1905 revolutin. There are various reasons as to why bloody Sunday may have not been a prime reason for the 1905 revolution; for the reason that there are a range of long and short term causes for the march such as the ill treatment of workers and oppression through serfdom, the Russiffication of Russia that eventually led up to what was the bloody Sunday march, this brings to light the question whether the 1905 revolution would have occurred without the events of bloody Sunday. However the events of bloody Sunday helped to bring publicity to what was the worsening political and social situation in Russia in addition to tarring the image of Nicholas the II. So to a certain extent bloody Sunday did play a part in the 1905 revolution however I still do not believe bloody Sunday was the prime reason for the revolution. ...read more.


The abolition of serfdom created more problems for the monarchy as redemption dues were introduced which ensured peasants would stay in poverty. Peasants also had to buy their own land since they were not provided with any. The emancipation of the serfs and the introduction of redemption dues lead to peasants travelling to the cities to find work where they ended up living in squalid conditions. These living and working conditions caused the bloody Sunday march. So to say that bloody Sunday was the main reason for the 1905 would be a mistake as many factors which could be seen as individual causes for the 1905 revolution lead up to the bloody Sunday march. This would however show the significance of the events of bloody Sunday in leading to the revolution, as people had not yet revolted because they still felt it was not the tsars fault for their suffering moreover he was still viewed as their 'little father'. The protest was merely to present a petition but the events that occurred may have triggered revolution as the results of bloody Sunday involved widespread disorder and strikes in the cities and eventually spread to the countryside. Consequently bloody Sunday may have not been a prime reason for revolution but one of many triggers of the revolution. ...read more.


have resulted in mass rebellion, the massacre in which civilians were killed again tarred the tsars reputation thus painting a poor portrait of the tsar in the eyes of his people. The events of Bloody Sunday undoubtedly played a major role in the 1905 revolution. I still can not see it as being the prime reason for the revolution as events leading to the revolution were occurring decades before the 1905 revolution. I can understand why it would be perceived as a prime reason for the revolution because it happened so close to the actual revolution. I however believe it was a trigger for the 1905 revolution but not the main cause for the revolution as I believe the revolution occurred because of the lack of reforms. This is because when reforms were made the revolution ended; this would suggest that the revolution purely took place purely because of the people's want of reforms. The events of Bloody was a cause for the 1905 revolution but not the prime cause, however the importance of the events in relation to the revolution are key as I feel the revolution would have not taken place with innocent people being killed on the 'orders' of the tsar thus inciting aggression and resistance thus leading to eventual revolution. Timothy Omacar 12AM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. FRench revolution

    The third estate was comprised of everybody else. The majority of the population resided in the third estate but didn't have an equal say in how the country was run. The third estate resented the fact that they were charged with the taxation burden whilst the first and second estates were exempt.

  2. Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

    The social and economic conditions were to some extent the result of Tsarist policies, offering little genuine and necessary reform.

  1. Europe In revolution

    The powers of Europe also wanted to keep old order which is ancient regime. It was established in France from15th century to the 18th century under the late Valois and Bourbon dynasties. Power in the Ancien R�gime relied on three pillars: the monarchy, the clergy, and the aristocracy.

  2. Europe in Revolution

    This developed in what was known as the Concert of Europe. It included Russia, Austria, Prussia and a hesitant France and Britain. These powers agreed to work together to uphold the terms of the settlement and quell any uprisings. For the most part the Concert was successful in the thirty or so years after it was founded.

  1. Russia 1905 - 1941

    So, in conclusion Lenin had a big impact on Russia and the Russian people. The NEP was a huge success, but it did have some bad side effects. One of the main long term effects of Lenin was the creation of the kulaks and Nepmen [private traders] which Stalin would have to tackle in order to gain full power.

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Question

    War Communism worked in this sense, for Russia it was a success, the Reds defeated the Whites. But for the Russian people, War Communism led to famine. War Communism was not the only factor, Lenin had no control over the drought of 1920 and 1921 but it was the seizing

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    This is true, at the date when this conversation took place in 1928, Stalin had already dismissed the Left Opposition who were Trotsky and two of his supporters, Zinoviev and Kamenev in 1927. By this time Stalin was in the process of eliminating the Right Opposition, of whom Bukharin was part of.

  2. 1798 Irish Rebellion notes

    the United Irish structure during 1795 and 1796 - depended upon sectarianism for much of their motivation and coherence and were thus significantly distinct from the single-mindedly agrarian secret societies of the rural South. 1. Nonetheless, neither the revolutionary sentiments nor the revolutionary actions of 1798 were simply matters of fissiparous localism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work