• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was control or Propaganda more important to consolidating Mussolini's Reign

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was control or Propaganda more important to consolidating Mussolini's Reign? To discover if either control or propaganda were more or equally important, there are many different areas to look at. Both control and propaganda were used in these areas, but with different effects and policies, while one may have been more necessary than the other. Each area is different and the different mediums that exist within them, such as radio or newspapers, were dealt with individually. Mussolini also had to strike a balance between the two, so his reputation amongst the people was kept intact. Politically, Mussolini made sure he established full control over Parliament and eventually, the country. He was not in favour of continuing the coalition governments which had dominated Italy for many years. He saw them to be weak and wanted to be the ruler of a one party state. From 1922 to 1929, he gradually destroyed all possible alternates to the Fascist regime. From, 1922 to 1923, Mussolini steadily built up his own power in the government. He placed loyal Fascists in key government positions, created the Voluntary Fascist Militia for National Security, and promoted the Grand Council of Fascism, the highest authority of the Fascist Party, into an organ of state. In July 1923, Mussolini was able to secure a new electoral law from the parliament. ...read more.

Middle

This control over the economy led to several problems. Exports were too expensive for other countries, smaller firm went out of business, it caused serious deflation and in 1936, the Lira had to be devalued. The battles for grain and the marshes were more successful. The Fascist aim of being self-sufficient in grain was achieved, but fertiliser self-sufficiency was not. Also, other forms of farming suffered and the price of bread rose. The battle of the marshes was the most successful. This created jobs by draining the Pontine marshes around Rome and ridding them of disease. Only 80,000 hectares of land were reclaimed by 1938, which was 1/20th of the propaganda claim. It did however create jobs and improve public health. Economically, Mussolini relied of propaganda to retain a positive image. In truth, his battles for Lira and grain were not successes and the propaganda which followed kept public faith in his policies. Also in the successful 'Battle for the Marshes', propaganda was used to fabricate the claims made about land repossession. In truth much less was reclaimed than was stated and plans made for the land were never realised. Social unrest was not possible under Mussolini's regime. In social policy, the workers' unions were replaced by the Corporations, directly controlled by the replaced by National Council of Corporations. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mussolini pursued his aggressive foreign policy rather cautiously up to the end of the 1920's because he did not want to arouse great opposition from the big powers, France and Britain. Mussolini first invaded Abyssinia in 1935. This was followed by the formation of Rome-Berlin Axis in November 1936. During the Spanish Civil War (1936-39) Mussolini also gave almost unlimited support to Franco. The military gains were used for propaganda purposes. These served to show Italy as a major power again and that more victories and power were to come. For foreign policy therefore, it appears that propaganda was more important. Overall, propaganda and control were equally important. Control made sure that Mussolini came to power and stayed there in the early years of his rule, while propaganda meant Fascist policy and the status of the country were always shown to be positive. Both served different purposes in different aspects of Mussolini's reign and both were used equally to consolidate his power in certain areas such as the economy, propaganda proved to be of more importance in order to keep the public on the side of the Fascists and in order to portray the picture they wanted the people to see. Elsewhere, control in the area of politics meant he became the dictator of Italy and also kept the powerful church out of running the country. In effect, both served the same purpose, in keeping Mussolini popular with the people, but both were undertaken in separate ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Why did Mussolini come to Power in 1922? How did Mussolini consolidate his position ...

    4 star(s)

    The liberal governments inability to solve the major problems it faced, and maybe even its own mutilation of Italy's victory in the war meant that Fascism via Mussolini was able

  2. How Successfully did Mussolini Consolidate Fascist Power between 1922 and 1925?

    He also gained support by introducing some reform: he 'vastly improved the public services', 'he reduced a superfluously large bureaucracy' and he gave Italy 'national security and national self-respect.' All these improvements compared with the previous Liberal governments', contribute to why people supported him.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    against leading party members as well as being a warning to others. Enemy Of The People: This term was used to describe those who were victims of the purges. Although it was a typical; communist phrase, it was a vague term that enabled the government to take action on a range of supposed offensives.

  2. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    principle of the Revolution against dictatorships - if it was extremely difficult to rob Napoleon of his position in power, then it meant that his system was not equal; no one else had a fair chance at gaining his position.

  1. "Mussolini knew that he could never influence those with education and culture, so his ...

    Few people had radios although their numbers increased from 40 000 in 1927 to 1 million in 1938. This was renovated by the use of loud speakers in the piazzas and radios in village halls. Although disregarded by Mussolini at first, the radio became a favoured tool in reaching the 'ignorant masses' whether at work, home or even school.

  2. Explain how Mussolini was able both to obtain office and to consolidate his power ...

    and property owners (in order to both secure votes and attract financial support from wealthy business interests); and through the exploitation of events as a demonstration of the weakness of parliament. The public perception of the rampant looting and rioting that accompanied the strikes was that the government was incapable

  1. Hitler's use of propaganda.

    Evaluation of Sources N� of Words:385 One of the sources to be evaluated is Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, by the British historian Alan Bullock. In this work, Bullock compares and contrasts Hitler's and Stalin's rules in every aspect. The book was published in 1998, more than 40 years after the events had taken place.

  2. To what extent was the Fascist control in Italy during the years 1925 - ...

    that there were some very influential people that could cause him problems. One of these people was the Pope. As 99% of Italians where Catholics then the Pope was their figure head and he had an ability to shape their minds to believe anything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work