• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was it justified for the U.S to drop the Atom bomb on Japan?

Extracts from this document...


Was it justified for the U.S to drop the Atom bomb on Japan? Historians have debated to wether the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. In this essay I will discuss the cause of the war breakout and wether it was morally, militarily or polically justified to use such a weapon. Japan had already conquered Manchuria and by 1941 Japan invaded deep into China. In 1941 Japan invaded Indo-China. Japan needed supplies of coal, oil, tin and other raw materials. America was very worried about Japanese advances in these areas. The Japanese army was virtually in control of China. Its leaders admired Dictators like Hitler. The USA had important trading links with China and could not afford to let Japan dominate the area. In 1941 America demanded that Japan withdraw from China and Indo-China, and stopped trading with Japan. This was particularly serious for Japan because it depended on America for 80% of its oil. However, Japan was not prepared to withdraw from China and Indo-China. On the 7th of December 1941 Japan launched an unprovoked surprise attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbour in Hawaii. America were so outraged from this attack they declared war on Japan the next day and Germany and Italy declared war on America three days later. A reason why the bomb was militarily justified was 'island hopping'. ...read more.


So perhaps the dropping of the bomb prevented a greater war with Russia, this meant the bomb was politically justified. The Japanese captured 14,000 P.O.W's in the first few months of the war and had completely disregarded the guidelines set by the Geneva convention in their treatment of the prisoners. POW's that were returned to America after the war averagely weighed less than 100 pounds and the conditions they had to live in were disgraceful. This kind of action towards POW's by the Japanese only gave America more of an insight in to how 'inhuman' they were and so the dropping of the bomb of these 'animals' who have killed allied and American soldiers is morally justified. Despite realising there military situation the Japanese showed no sign of giving up. In fact all the evidence indicates that they were preparing for a massive and stubborn defence of there islands. Also, the invasion of Japan would have had big effects of America's economy because it was feared an invasion of Japan may cost too much. If it is possible then the logical conclusion is to keep all your infantry in their barracks and annihilate your enemy 'en masse'. That way any war could be reduced to a day or two and allied casualties eliminated all together. Truman stated in his diary about the warning to be given ("we will have given them a chance") ...read more.


The Japanese were willing to accept nearly everything, accept a surrender that would include removing the Emperor as the seat of all power. When America dropped the first bomb they gave Japan no chance to surrender and proceeded to drop the second bomb. Japan would almost have certainly surrendered after assessing the damage of the first bomb, this proves to dropping of the bomb to be seriously morally unjustified because the Suzuki cabinet were seeking to surrender when it was dropped. Racism towards the Japanese was profound. Americans totally de-humanised them. This makes one wonder if America, under equivalent circumstances, would have been able to use the bomb on the Germans. The deliberate targeting of a civilian population is always a war crime. It is not permitted even if it is believed to bring victory nearer. If allied troops had systematically made their way through the streets of Hiroshima with flamethrowers and incinerated every man, woman and child in sight, who would attempt to justify such a war crime? But because the bomb makes a distance, literally, between cause and effect, agent and action, guilt is denied. If you have a terrible weapon in your hand, the morality of using it should demand that you not consider using it until you are in extremis. Was America in Extremis? In my opinion they were not. They had one the European war, were ahead of the game in men and material and Russia was ready to enter the war against Japan 1463 words Samuel Dean 11BH Mr Cleanthous ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did America drop the atomic bomb on Japan

    America had spent $2 billon on building the Atomic Bomb the world first nuclear weapon and most expensive weapon in history, therefore they wouldn't want it to seem to America they had wasted money so Truman had to prove its worth by using it on Japan.

  2. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    Japan could then be asked to surrender'. This tell us that if Japan had been given a demonstration, they would have possible surrendered because of what destruction one atomic bomb can cause. However there was no demonstration and the atomic bomb was dropped and thousands of lives were lost.

  1. Was it justified for the U.S.A. to drop the atom bomb on Japan?

    It would be easier and less costly in American lives for the atom bomb to be dropped, and would force Japan into surrender. The Japanese used Kamikaze pilots in 1945 in the last months of the war, who were prepared to use their planes as very accurate bombs, killing themselves in the process.

  2. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    Samuel Walker barely focuses on the USSR and instead places the reason as to simply save lives. Neither even mention the USA's involvement in the 1919-1921 Russian Civil war; an attempt by the Americans to usurp the Bolsheviks, which would have led to undeniable tension and lack of cohesion between the two countries.

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    The scientists however are not to blame as they protested against the atomic bomb. This show that the dropping of the bomb may have been negotiated more as they didn't know the long term effects, however it is also unjustifiable because they should have known.

  2. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    see the fruits of his labours before the end of the war." From a book published by the campaign for nuclear disarmament in 1985. "A demonstration of the bomb might best be made on the desert or on a barren Island.

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    In total my first draft was made up of two-thousand one-hundred words, around a little more than a thousand words short than the maximum allowed. I took advantage of this and decided that I would use this gap to analysis each fact I presented.

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    (as quoted in Walker 94) If Truman had faltered in his decision to use the atomic bombs, public certainty of his capability to lead the United States would have been significantly undermined. As a result of the attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941, a general feeling of hatred stemmed from the American public towards the Japanese race.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work