• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was it the weaknesses of the Royalists or the strength of their opponents which best explains the outcome of the First Civil by 1646

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was it the weaknesses of the Royalists or the strength of their opponents which best explains the outcome of the First Civil by 1646 There are several key factors determining why the royalists lost the English civil war in the years 1642 - 1646. The factors that caused their defeat were Cromwell's talent for warfare and how he displayed it on the battlefield. The factions of the royalist command structure tearing the royalist campaign in two. The formation of the New Model Army. King Charles alienating many possible supporters of him with his decisions leading up to and including the civil war. Propaganda helping the parliamentarian cause during the English civil war. The affect of dual roles as King and Commander in Chief of Royalist forces upon King Charles The Formation of the New Model Army Neither side really had an advantage when it came to experienced soldiers in the country and both sides were initially commanded by men who gained their rank to their status in society rather than military ability. The New model army was now well organised on a sound basis, drilled, disciplined and administrated in uniform fashion, in complete contrast of a few years ago to the 'Ad Hoc' (before the English Civil war the army was formed when a problem arose then immediately disbanded when the problem dissolved) ...read more.

Middle

Rupert himself is said to have coined the name "Ironside" for Cromwell, which became popular with the army and was extended to his troopers. Cromwell also became increasingly critical of the leadership of Manchester himself, and denounced him before the House of Commons in November 1644 for his unwillingness to take decisive action against the Royalists. A leading supporter of the Self Denying Ordinance Act ,1644, Cromwell was one of the few Members of Parliament exempted from resigning his commission in the army under its terms. He was officially appointed lieutenant-general of horse under Sir Thomas Fairfax in the New Model Armyjust before the decisive Parliamentarian victory at Naseby in June 1645, during which Cromwell routed Langdale's Northern Horse and rallied the Ironsides for a charge against the Royalist infantry that decided the outcome of the battle. Despite having no military training or experience prior to 1642, Cromwell was generally regarded as the greatest soldier in England by the time he and Fairfax received the surrender of Oxford in June 1646. On occasion Cromwell's contribution to Parliament's victory's during the First Civil War were exaggerated by Parliamentarian propaganda. Not until the great battles of Marston Moor (1644) and Naseby (1645) did he have a decisive effect on the fortunes of the war, and even in the case of Marston Moor, his importance is disputed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Charles wavered easily in the direction of his side's war effort. Managing a war fought against people who were your own subjects but who were following traitors was difficult and especially so for someone lacking self confidence. Often his reliance on stronger men meant that inept commanders had a direct hand in the running of the war effort. This reliance became one of the Commander in Chief of the Royalist forces and the King of Great Britain major predicaments. In my opinion all of the above points helped in the victory of the parliamentarians during the civil war. But no single factor can be said that was the main point for the way in which the civil war turned out. An example of this is in saying that if it was not for Cromwell the parliamentarians would have lost the civil war; I believe this to be untrue as the parliamentarian side would have found another person to take his place who would have been as successful as Cromwell was if not more. The same can be said for the factors causing the defeat of the royalist side no one factor can be blamed for there defeat. In essence the defeat of the royalist side cannot be blamed on one point but more of a snow balling effect of small problems and hindrances that did not affect the royalists to much in the short term but proved fatal in the long term scheme of things during the civil war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Did Oliver Cromwell achieve his objectives from 1642 to 1658?

    5 star(s)

    All titles were kept, again pleasing the upper classes. Cromwell was extremely successful in this area, although the gentry were not completely behind the government, very few attempts were made to overthrow it and they slowly grew to realise this regime was an effective one.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    The Drogheda incident might have been the most controversial matter, but anyways here is a brief description of what might have happened: "His troops massacred nearly everyone in the garrison and the town - which Cromwell justified as the "righteous judgment of God upon these barbarous wretches" -*10 During the

  1. Hisotyr Coursework

    This discontent was closely linked with a lot of trade union activity as this was the only viable way the working class people could get their voice across. The repeal of the Combination Acts did not help the government as it triggered a wave of union activity.

  2. "Conflict and Contest" or "Cooperation and consent," which phrase best sums up Elizabeth I's ...

    However it can be argued as the incorrect interpretation due to the belief that the Queen did want Mary Queen of Scots executed, however she did not want the blame for it. In the events that took place, she was able to blame her Council.

  1. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    groups, but Pym's powers of persuasion and the firing of Henry Marten, a powerful war group leader, helped to reassure the peace group. The Royalists were of course led by King Charles the 1st, who was the second son of the former King, James the 1st.

  2. What was the most significant cause of civil strife in England from 1455-61?

    One of the symptoms of this shift in power from the King was the perversion of the feudal system, or bastard feudalism - a phrase coined by Charles Plummer in the late 1800s. In most of medieval England, society was dependent on the conventional form of this system, which was based on the allocation of land in return for service.

  1. Was it the weaknesses of the Royalists or the strength of their opponents which ...

    views of a few of the ramble, but the trust twisted couldn't (in my opinion) out sell loyalties and sway entire towns of men, and make flanks of men rout, Propaganda only had true effect once the king had lost the battle of Naseby, when the kings carriage and his

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    Placing its funds and support at the disposal of the Government. By 1915 2milion men were fighting and women were needed to fill the jobs they left behind. David Lloyd George ? Minister for Munitions, gave Emmeline Pankhurst and the WSPU funds to run demonstrations and meetings to encourage women into the workforce.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work