• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Mussolini an all powerful dictator?

Extracts from this document...


Was Mussolini an all powerful dictator? If a man was described as a dictator one would rightly think of a ruler who dictates to his country and does not rule democratically. Dictators tend to come to power by gaining the support of the masses but once in power exercise an absolute, and often arbitrary and illiberal rule. They are intolerant of any opposition, repressing them through the use of secret police, to ensure complete control. An all-powerful dictator would ensure that he was irreplaceable, in absolute and total control of the state. Mussolini had the semblance of a dictator. He advocated an aggressive foreign policy and was even consulted about when the police could wear summer uniforms! Indeed at first glance Mussolini was seemingly an all-powerful dictator. However, many believe that with closer inspection the concept of Mussolini being all-powerful establishes itself as something of a myth- The Mussolini Myth. Mussolini can be seen as a powerful dictator as he maintained strong control over his party, rather than allowing it to dictate to him or share power with him. The Fascists expected that now Mussolini was in power they would take over the state. This however, was not the case. Mussolini did not give all the top government positions to Fascist's but kept non- Fascist's in his cabinet. ...read more.


Party membership continued to increase indicating that people were interested in it; this would not be the case if it were an irrelevance. Although Mussolini did not fill his cabinet with Fascist's many of the top jobs were taken by Fascist's. It is debatable however as to whether these Fascist supporters truly believed in the Fascist ideology or simply wanted to join because they knew they would have better career prospects. The fact that Mussolini needed someone like Farinacci to centralise the party meant that he was not all- powerful. Such a dictator would have been able to do so himself. His dismissal of Farinacci also shows Mussolini's power as being limited, as one would expect a dictator to have someone so outspoken and powerful assassinated to protect his position. Mussolini held several ministerial positions and gave others to sycophants whom he knew posed no threat to him. Again a true dictator would not need to hold so many positions as he would be able to trust and command his men. Mussolini also failed to ensure that the party was weak enough so that it could not overthrow him. Although the Fascist Grand Council appeared to be less important and significantly weak it still managed to sack him as leader of the party in 1943. ...read more.


However, this could also be interpreted another way. Perhaps Mussolini had no desire to be oppressive but merely elevate the position of the Italian people, or perhaps it was simply because Mussolini was indeed weak and knew that he could not get away with repression to that extent particularly with the elites still in place. There is some implication that the regime was poplar rather dictatorial. People were informing and joining Fascist organisations such as the OND and the PNF. Mussolini set up mass leisure organisations to get the people active. Many joined and participated. One explanation for this is that people were satisfied and impressed by the social and economic successes brought about by Mussolini. Although it may seem that people were happy with the regime and felt apart of it agreeing with its ideology, it could be that people wanted to take advantage of free entertainment. Therefore perhaps Mussolini was not a dictator but a leader who had won the conditional support of the people. Mussolini was clearly not an all-powerful dictator. He failed to secure his position fully by allowing people who had the power to overthrow him to remain in their places- the king, the army and the church. Furthermore, he was not fully in control of the party, although he held a substantial amount. Mussolini then, was not a dictator but nor was he a democratic leader. He had the semblance of an all powerful dictator but managed only to be an authoritarian leader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Why did Mussolini come to Power in 1922? How did Mussolini consolidate his position ...

    4 star(s)

    The liberal governments inability to solve the major problems it faced, and maybe even its own mutilation of Italy's victory in the war meant that Fascism via Mussolini was able

  2. Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

    Another claim is that it was a deliberate Machiavellian tactic by Hitler to safeguard and even increase his power. This so-called 'divide and rule' strategy is claimed to have limited all Hitler's subordinates' power as their work was always being checked and challenged by other subordinates.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    King victor Emmanuel disliked the Republicanism and therefore would not replace him with a Republican and also he feared a uprising from the people, and felt this was a lot less likely under fascism than socialism, so fascism was the only option and Mussolini was the top fascist politician, so in a very powerful position.

  2. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    was given substantial economic and political resources which aided them in their activities. It's clear that their influence was to be taken into account. Leaders like Goering and Bormann stood aside of this groups and opposed entirely to their role and expanding influence.

  1. Why Was Mussolini Able To Become A Dictator Just Six Years After His Appointment ...

    and the main Socialist Party. This division of the Socialists meant they were not a threat to Fascism. * The Roman Catholic Popular Party (PPI) was undecided in their attitude towards Socialism. Mussolini had introduced policies to gain the Catholics support and the right-wing members of the PPI felt that Fascism was a better option than Socialism.

  2. Benito Mussolini.

    in 1922, where about 50,000 black shirts were on their way to Rome with the aim to seize power, Mussolini wanted to protest against the continual disruption and industrial unrests, as well as ensure an important position in Italian government. The king declared him Prime minister without a moment's hesitating.

  1. Why Did Mussolini Become a Virtual Dictator By 1925?

    Another reason that Mussolini gained power was his use of his black shirts. Mussolini controlled a sort of Fascism army called his black shirt squads. He used his army to great effect by bullying those who did not support Fascism to support it.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    on any legislation passed by the Senate (to prevent a dictatorship), became increasingly unimportant in the later years of Napoleon?s rule. The Tribunate was purged in 1802 to prevent any opposition to his regime, whilst Napoleon elected new, loyal members for the Legislature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work