• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Stalin a success?

Extracts from this document...


Was Stalin a success? In 1953 Joseph Stalin died, which left Russia in deep distress because they had lost a great political leader. I feel that with out a doubt Stalin was a success and there are three points which I will study to help prove this: Was he a success in his own terms?, was he a success in the terms of Russia? And was he Success in the terms of Communism?. . Stalin was a person you couldn't get to know personally he had friends, but many which he chose to ignore. Throughout Stalin's Reign he was very ruthless. People say there was a reason why Stalin was so ruthless and that was because he beloved wife died when they were at the peak of there marriage and this left a hole in his heart which he would later take out on the people of Russia. Firstly, was he a success in his own terms?. There are six points which prove that he was a success in his own terms starting off with his struggle for is his struggle for power, which without a doubt was a great success, due to his ability to out maneuver the other candidates in the race for power (Zinoviev/ Bukharin). ...read more.


Stalin Begins to take control of eastern Europe in 1945- 48, Stalin turns Europe into Communists, Whilst gradually chopping off opposing countries, and things that will bring the countries down . In 1953 Joseph Stalin died of natural causes, he was at the peak of his power. Even after his death he was perceived as the man who changed Russia. I feel that in Stalin's own terms I can official say that he was a success because every situation Stalin faced he always cam out on top. Secondly, was Stalin a success in his own terms?: in Russia's terms there are three points which prove him not to be a success. Firstly the Five-year plan. The five year plan never did much for the Russian workers , because the first five year plan concentrated on capital goods such as shoes clothes etc which was only good for yourself, which were not that important at that time in Russia. The other five Year plans concentrated on consumer goods such as coal, oil, railways and trucks etc which was good because it could help others. The five year plan also concentrated on military productions before during and after the war, which resulted in the workers being alienated from the system and there own productivity was low meaning that they didn't benefit from any thing that was being produced. ...read more.


In the terms of Communism Stalin was both a success and a failure. He was a success due to the fact he Transformed Russia into a Communist country, but whilst doing that he put a whole new meaning to the word communism. Stalin turned Communism into to a ruthless, brutal system, which would control the deaths of many innocent civilians. I have come to the verdict that all these reasons can be linked to prove Stalin to be a success For instance Stalin's strong character shows a lot of perseverance, which is linked with the great terror because the reason he launched the great terror was to put across the image of a strong character, and his strong character continued throughout his reign until he nearly surrendered to the Germans. Both the five-year plans and the collectivization can be linked because they both involve producing goods for a better Russia, these productivity was meet but it left the people of Russia with nothing to gain. Finally I feel that Stalin was too harsh towards the Russian people because he could have succeeded in transforming Russia by using a less brutal technique, For example Bukharin's plan were he motivates the workers and the peasants, whilst keeping a balanced productivity gain off there work. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Operation Barbarossa - Causes and Consequences

    In 1942 the German army opened another year of campaigning in the USSR. At first the attacks went well again, although at a slower pace than the previous year. However, they were beginning to have problems. They were being driven slowly back from Moscow and Leningrad would not give up under a horrific siege.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    There were the very rich but they were such a small number that they didn't pose any threat. But there were many Kulaks. He could only think of three ways of dealing with them. These were: firing squads, moving them to Siberia, or downgrade them to peasant level.

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    Stalin and his NKVD (secret police) chief, Beria, used this as evidence of disloyalty by national minorities. Furthermore, the "initial welcome extended by the villages to their believed [Nazi] liberators"10, particularly in the Ukraine and Caucasus regions, fuelled feelings of distrust.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    He gained power and notoriety and was becoming an extreme threat as the leader of the Nazi party. Hindenburg was not particularly fond of him but there was the misconception that as chancellor he could be control, "Hindenberg, shaken but still unwilling to give power to Hitler, agreed to do

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * These casualties sometimes, as at Marengo, Ulm, Austerlitz and Jena, numbered three times as many as those suffered by the French. This strategy was new. Guibert had proposed this strategy years earlier, but as Napoleon put it, "everything is in the execution", thus we cannot belittle his brilliance. iv)

  2. Was Stalin a Success?

    These successes from the point of view of Stalin would have meant that he was a success; because it was due to him that all of these 'successes' happened. This is only from the opinion of Stalin, whereas these 'successes' may have been felt differently from the terms of the

  1. Assess the Impact that Stalin had on Russia and the Russian People

    This was tightly controlled by the government and acted as propaganda in favour of Stalin also. Outside of school time, Stalin ensured that children were encouraged to attend political youth groups (started by Lenin) such as the Octobrists, the Pioneers and the Komosol.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The Shakty Trial: A group of engineers working in the Shakty coal mines in the Donbas region were accused of sabotage and treason. The Central Committee declared that this incident showed ?new forms and new methods of bourgeois counter-revolution against proletarian dictatorship and against socialist industrialisation?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work