Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6

Was the appeasement of Nazi Germany by Britain and France ever anything more than an attempt to buy time?

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Was the appeasement of Nazi Germany by Britain and France ever anything more than an attempt to buy time? The policy of appeasement, which both Britain and France took toward Nazi Germany and it's expansionist aims during the late 1930s, is one of the most controversial and criticised foreign policies in history. Appeasement policy has been given short shrift by historians and the public alike since the 1930s, with the general consensus being that if Britain and France would have taken a harder line against the Nazi's then Hitler's aggressive policy could have been checked. However, the view of appeasement has not been totally one sided. Many revisionist historians have arrived at the view that appeasement was necessary for both Britain and France as a way of buying time for rearmament so that they would militarily be able to oppose Nazi Germany. This essay will closely look at that viewpoint to correctly assess whether that was one of the chief aims of appeasement. Firstly it is apt to actually define what appeasement actually was. Appeasement was the policy of satisfying Hitler's demands by making certain concessions in order to avoid conflict. But was this policy motivated by ideology, the actual view that it was the morally right and just policy to follow, or was it, as the question prompts, merely a front to buy more time?

Middle

The incoming Germans numbered approximately 60,000, yet the Army General Staff reported to the French government that in addition to that figure there were further 235,000 paramilitaries.3 Public opinion was also against intervention, as Bell states; "the almost unanimous view of the press on 8 March and the following days was to renounce the idea of war, or action of any kind."4 France was politically fragile at this time, with temporary government being lead by a widely renowned weak leader, Albert Sarraut. Any action taken would deem to be unpopular, especially as 1936 was an election year in France. This sets the scene for future French appeasement. The reaction of Britain to Hitler's remilitarisation of the Rhineland was indifference, and further highlights Britain's disinterest at this time in European matters, and as with the French the public and the press showed little interest in conflict with Germany over what was seen as 'their own back garden'. The remilitarisation of the Rhineland has been pointed out as being the key moment in European relations in the 1930s. Geoff Layton states that it was "the decisive turning point in European International Relations"5 in that it provided Hitler with a first real triumph of his Foreign Policy and it showed to him that Britain and France would not oppose Germany by force.

Conclusion

The fear of German attack was foremost in the minds of the British politicians, and because of which the RAF was virtually given unlimited funds with which build up the air force, again this was further backed up by over estimates of the Luftwaffes strength. In conclusion, it would have to be said that the question of appeasement just being simply a policy with which to buy time is wrong. Appeasement started off with the clear aim to avoid conflict and preserve peace in Europe. It was only after Munich in 1938 that it also became a tool with which to buy time with which to build up military strength. However with that view in mind, it can also be said that appeasement was a failure. The time it bought for France wasn't enough, hence Germany's easy victory over her neighbour in 1940. Yet the opposite could be said for Britain, appeasement allowed the RAF to build up it's strength, with which it was able to defeat the Germans in the Battle of Britain. The time appeasement bought for the British aided it's survival, as the champion of appeasement Neville Chamberlain said in a letter to his sister in 1939: "they [the Germans] could not make nearly such a mess of us now as they could have done, while we could make much more of a mess of them.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    'I had spent six years in St. Petersburg before the war in the best days of the old Russian ballet,' wrote Sir Nevile Henderson, 'but for grandiose beauty I have never seen a ballet to compare with it." To see the films of the Nuremberg rallies even today is to

  2. Life in Nazi Germany, 1933-1945

    In answering this question, I am going to examine the real aims of the Nazi social policies, and assess the actual consequences of the policies introduced. The first group I am going to look at involves women and their families.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The Bolsheviks lead protests demanding to over throw the provisional government. Many Bolsheviks were in disagreement to if it would be better to wait or support the demonstrations. The lack of organisation resulted in blood shed and Bolshevik losing support.

  2. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    Pogroms in Russia in the 1880s had forced many Jews to emigrate. Many ended up in the United States but several thousand also went to Palestine where they became shopkeepers and craftsmen. Other Jews, combining Marxist ideals with ardent Jewish nationalism, became farmers and labourers.

  1. Bismarck's effect on Germany and Europe

    Although an alliance could not be made, Bismarck did arrange an agreement with Russia solidifying their friendship. The last time the text was revealed was to Austria because Bismarck was under pressure by the Austrian-Hungary generals to declare war against Russia.

  2. Even after the German occupation of Prague in March 1939, Neville Chamberlain was reluctant ...

    Chamberlain had significant cause to hold this view; as a result of the fact that at the Nuremburg Rally in September 1938, Hitler himself had demanded self-determination of Germans living within the Sudetenland, which was a factor that had driven much of the 1919 peace settlements.

  1. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    It is possible that the modern focus on Gladstone as a highly religious politician was brought about by Disraeli's very public attacks on his fervent religious beliefs. Disraeli held nothing but scorn for Gladstone's religion, and talked with disdain of him always 'preaching, praying, speechifying or scribbling'4.

  2. Were the 1930's the Devils Decade or The Dawn of Affluence?

    Furthermore widowers faced a similar benefits trap. As a widower it was inevitable that you would face poverty as men were the predominant wage earners, therefore the government would offer widowers pension. Similar to old age pensions this was not enough to support a women and especially not an entire family.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.