• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the collapse of tsardom inevitable in Russia by 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the collapse of tsardom inevitable in Russia by 1914? In 1914, Russia had the largest army in the world, the largest air force and a respectable naval fleet. Yet, this military powerhouse had just a few years back suffered a terrible setback with the loss of their Baltic fleet at the hands of the Japanese at Tsushima. During the First World War, Russia lost more than three million people, close to 2% of their entire population and had a further five million wounded. Three years later came the collapse of tsardom. Had the wars proved too much for the Tsar to handle? The question suggests that the collapse was a done deal as of the year 1914 and there was nothing anybody or anything could have done to prevent its collapse. In this essay, we will attempt to weigh the factors that seemed to suggest that tsardom was doomed by 1914 against those which seem to suggest otherwise in order to make a valued judgment on just how assured the collapse of tsardom by the said year is, if even at all. The situation certainly looked bleak for tsardom since Nicholas' ascension in 1894. ...read more.

Middle

The result of this were inherent splits in the country and growing dissatisfaction which seemed to point towards the impending collapse of tsardom in the near future. The events that led however were more serious. With Russia's costly battle with the Japanese and failure to bring victory home, there was great humiliation having lost to a supposedly inferior island nation. This contributed to the buildup of tension leading up to the 1905 revolution. The Bloody Sunday incident, which was essentially a petition to the Tsar by groups of workers and their families to relieve them of their desperate conditions but ended in a violent dismissal with 200 marchers killed and hundreds injured gravely damaged the image of Nicholas II as the anointed protector and ruler of the country. Following the disorder that followed and the Potemkin mutiny, the Tsar was forced to issue the October Manifesto in the face of such united opposition. The revolution revealed the cracks in the system and showed that in the face of pressure, even the 'great' Tsar had to look towards appeasement. Compared to the unquestionable authority and absolute respect held by previous Tsars from the masses for the past 300 years, Nicholas's reign seemed to be look bleak and it would not have been far-fetched to have considered a possible end to tsardom at that point in time. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is therefore at this point not absolute that tsardom was doomed to collapse by 1914 despite growing unhappiness; for while the boat of tsardom was rocking, it could easily be stabilised as long as control over the military was held and key groups of people appeased; thereby limiting the ability of anyone from removing the entire institution. The First World War would prove to be the catalyst for the 1917 revolution as well as the collapse of tsardom because it removed the stabilisation criterion from the equation. With the desertion of one million soldiers as well as the loss of support of close aides and supporters with them going so far as to call for his abdication, Nicholas II no longer had the necessary support needed to maintain his reign and subsequently this ended tsardom in its entirety. We can therefore say at this point that without the foundations for the collapse in place, which would be the events from 1894 to 1905, tsardom might not have collapsed and it was the culmination of all these factors that spelt its end. But if the First World War had not happened, there would not have been a catalyst for this reaction and it would have materialised. Therefore, I am not in support of the view of the assured collapse of tsardom by 1914. (1251 words) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    The Bolsheviks, however, had very strong leadership in Lenin. Lenin appealed to the people of Russia because he tried everything to look and act like a worker - like one of the Russian people. He wore an ill-fitting suit and a crooked tie and looked like a small tradesman.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    After all historians can't even agree on the numbers killed or arrested, let alone why the Terror happened! * There is no doubt that Stalin, along with all Bolsheviks, wanted to use every means in his power to turn Russia into a strong industrial power.

  1. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    Due to urbanisation, Moscow tripled in its size. The modernisation of Russia would have to seemingly be imposed from the top down, since there was a lack of a bourgeoisie. Conversely, Tsar Nicholas II was unprepared to subside some of his power to make this happen and for a middle

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    The peasants had always been loyal to the Tsar. They blamed the landowners and the bureaucrats for their miserable conditions. The Tsar was known as the 'little father' and the peasants believed that he was deeply concerned for their welfare.

  1. Apeasement Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the ...

    and all her non-European colonies were to be placed under the control of the League of Nations. The Saar coalmining region was to be placed under the leagues control until 1935 and all foreign currency and gold was to be confiscated.

  2. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    and all her non-European colonies were to be placed under the control of the League of Nations. The Saar coalmining region was to be placed under the leagues control until 1935 and all foreign currency and gold was to be confiscated.

  1. How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom during the reign of Nicholas II?

    That meant not making promises that couldn?t be kept. Tsar Nicholas II ?Stubborn but without will; nervous but insensitive to everything; taut and cautious in speech, he was no longer master of the situation, and did not take one clearly conscious step?? (Blok 1916) (Lynch M 1992) p 73 ?A ruler who cannot be trusted, who approves today what

  2. How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom in the reign of Nicholas II

    Sergei Witte was keen to continue his predecessor?s (Ivan Vyshnegradsky) work and develop the country as an industrial power. A significant implication of this process was to attract major foreign investment, that in turn helped to fund projects such as the Trans-Siberian Railway, increasing economic production and output and extending

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work