• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the dropping of the A bombs justified? The year is 1945 in the city of Hiroshima, on the 6th of august. The whole city is packed

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the dropping of the A bombs justified? The year is 1945 in the city of Hiroshima, on the 6th of august. The whole city is packed and little do they know that the first ever A bomb is going to fall on top of them at 8:15. This bomb, nicknamed "little boy" quite literally vaporised people in the epicentre. People that even looked at the bomb were blinded, possibly the worst fate of all was to be one of thousands who thought they were safe but in fact they had been exposed to a lethal dose of radiation. To be sick and die not knowing what was wrong with you. Next a statement from the president of the USA, Harry Truman, warned Japan that if they did not now surrender they could "expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth". This is exactly what they got when they failed to surrender. This time a plutonium bomb was dropped in Nagasaki. ...read more.

Middle

America and Britain were struggling in the war for the pacific and the Japanese were not going to surrender easily. America and Britain had lost substantial numbers of troops. At that time the decision may have seemed simple at the time because the allies were just finding out about the terrible things that the Japanese were doing to the allied prisoners of war. One P.O.W wrote in his book about his time in Japan that "these bombs saved many more lives than the tens of thousands that they killed. They saved the lives tens of thousands of prisoners of war, hundreds of thousands of allied servicemen and almost certainly the lives of millions of Japanese." This extract would suggest that this P.O.W was in favour of the atom bomb. However, the effects of the bomb were so terrible that we must ask why Truman decided to use it. Was this the only option Truman had? After all, there is evidence to suggest that the war was almost won. ...read more.

Conclusion

The world had judged Truman and concluded that he did the right thing. However, more evidence has emerged. There is evidence that the Japanese had tried to surrender several times but that their offer had been rejected. Doubts have crept in. Did Truman really have no option but to use the atomic bomb? Or was he prepared to use this phenomenal weapon to prove something to the world. Quite frankly I don't think it is possible to tell which it was. The boost the war effort or the mans ego? And Finally to the conclusion my original hypothesis that Truman was wrong to drop the bombs may have been correct but not for the reasons that I put. Now I believe that If Truman sincerely wanted to end the war he would have accepted the Japanese offers of surrender. The Fact that he didn't showed that he has no respect of human life. Over 40,000 men, women and children were killed by quite possibly his rash, selfish actions. On the other hand if the Japanese hadn't offered to surrender then maybe he did the only thing he thought was right. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    They were to be hit three times as hard as Pearl Harbor with atomic bombs. The Japanese would not surrender. 'There was no weakening the Japanese determination to fight. The total strength if the Japanese army was about five million men.

  2. The purpose of my examination of war is to question whether the resort to ...

    Thus, I intend to argue that preemptive strikes in extreme circumstances by a third party states can be morally sustained as a legitimate form of self defence. In order to achieve this end, I will first establish that preemptive strikes launched by the 'victim' state are essentially an act of self defence and therefore justified.

  1. Was it justified for the U.S.A. to drop the atom bomb on Japan?

    But as surrender was disgraceful they carried on, planning to fight to the last man. This was all happening before the bombs were dropped. The American leaders wanted/needed to test the destructiveness of the atomic bomb in warfare. They had two, one they had tested was made from plutonium, and the non-tested one was made from uranium.

  2. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    Furthermore, if the Americans had been motivated by racism they would not have stated in the Potsdam declaration that Japan would not be "enslaved as a race or destroyed as a nation". The fact that the USA even warned Japan to surrender is evidence in itself that they were not

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    Kantaro Suzuki, who replaced Kuniaki Koiso on April 1945 as Prime Minister, rejected the Potsdam declaration as a more vague version of the earlier declined proposition. Suzuki mainly wanted to dictate appeasement of the Japanese military, which demeaned the purpose of the idea of 'unconditional surrender', than to benefit anything to the Allies.

  2. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    "I expect the 100 million people of the glorious Empire to join themselves in a shield to protect the Emperor and the Imperial land from the invader." The response was terrific, in nation wide call, over 28,000,000 people joined the local militia regiments.

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    Many people assume that it was due to Emperor Hirohito that Japan joined the Axis. But they were far from the truth. "Cautious as ever, he criticized Japan's decision to join the Axis powers". The following year that Japan had joined the Axis Alliance, the government of Japan was in the impression that they were now untouchable.

  2. Was it justified for the U.S to drop the Atom bomb on Japan?

    shows his decency, absent in those who chose the attack on Pearl Harbour without warning. He wanted people to see that Americans are honourable and noble and the Japanese, who will later be bombed, are nothing but animals because of the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbour.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work