• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the dropping of the A bombs justified? The year is 1945 in the city of Hiroshima, on the 6th of august. The whole city is packed

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the dropping of the A bombs justified? The year is 1945 in the city of Hiroshima, on the 6th of august. The whole city is packed and little do they know that the first ever A bomb is going to fall on top of them at 8:15. This bomb, nicknamed "little boy" quite literally vaporised people in the epicentre. People that even looked at the bomb were blinded, possibly the worst fate of all was to be one of thousands who thought they were safe but in fact they had been exposed to a lethal dose of radiation. To be sick and die not knowing what was wrong with you. Next a statement from the president of the USA, Harry Truman, warned Japan that if they did not now surrender they could "expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth". This is exactly what they got when they failed to surrender. This time a plutonium bomb was dropped in Nagasaki. ...read more.

Middle

America and Britain were struggling in the war for the pacific and the Japanese were not going to surrender easily. America and Britain had lost substantial numbers of troops. At that time the decision may have seemed simple at the time because the allies were just finding out about the terrible things that the Japanese were doing to the allied prisoners of war. One P.O.W wrote in his book about his time in Japan that "these bombs saved many more lives than the tens of thousands that they killed. They saved the lives tens of thousands of prisoners of war, hundreds of thousands of allied servicemen and almost certainly the lives of millions of Japanese." This extract would suggest that this P.O.W was in favour of the atom bomb. However, the effects of the bomb were so terrible that we must ask why Truman decided to use it. Was this the only option Truman had? After all, there is evidence to suggest that the war was almost won. ...read more.

Conclusion

The world had judged Truman and concluded that he did the right thing. However, more evidence has emerged. There is evidence that the Japanese had tried to surrender several times but that their offer had been rejected. Doubts have crept in. Did Truman really have no option but to use the atomic bomb? Or was he prepared to use this phenomenal weapon to prove something to the world. Quite frankly I don't think it is possible to tell which it was. The boost the war effort or the mans ego? And Finally to the conclusion my original hypothesis that Truman was wrong to drop the bombs may have been correct but not for the reasons that I put. Now I believe that If Truman sincerely wanted to end the war he would have accepted the Japanese offers of surrender. The Fact that he didn't showed that he has no respect of human life. Over 40,000 men, women and children were killed by quite possibly his rash, selfish actions. On the other hand if the Japanese hadn't offered to surrender then maybe he did the only thing he thought was right. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Argue either for or against this statement, "President Truman's decision to drop the bombs ...

    Droppings bombs and deploying troops to kill enemy troops are one and the same; both result in the death of many. In any war, the point of war is to win. When it comes to war, the moral thoughts that govern society are not the same morals that govern the military.

  2. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    motivated by revenge; if they had been they would never have warned them, as the Japanese hadn't regarding Pearl Harbour. Takaki also places equal importance on Truman's need to prove his masculinity. According to Takaki, Truman an "inferiority complex" (a statement he has clearly taken out of context from a quote Truman made about his childhood)

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    American officials believed that the Japanese had deserved their fate. The Japanese had dropped high-explosives and incendiary bomb at Pearl Harbour in Hawaii, 7th December 1941, which was the American naval base, and had attacked without any kind of warning to an attack or a declaration of war.

  2. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    This was the top-secret effort by the Americans to build an atomic bomb. Originally, the main motivation for this was the fear that Germany's nuclear expertise would be utilised by Hitler to build an atomic bomb for Nazi Germany. Had they managed to do so, they could have used it

  1. On the 6th August 1945, America dropped the first ever atomic bomb on a ...

    In 1941 the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour to slow down the Americans from stopping them taking over land in the Far East. The plan was for the Japanese to take over territories that belonged to Britain, France and Holland in south East Asia.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    It exploded about 600 meters (2,000 feet) above the city with a blast equivalent to 13 kilotons of TNT, killing an estimated 80,000 civilians. One of the pilots, Paul Tibbets was moved to cry, "My god, what have we done?"

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    The rate of wounded to fatalities was estimated to be 3 to 1, so 175,000 US casualties were not out of the question. However these early reports were rejected by George Marshall, the army's chief of staff. Another estimate was put forward by Admiral Leahy, he concluded that it would

  2. WAS THE DROPPING F THE ATOMIC BOMBS JUSTIFIED?

    Source C supports source B very much. As source B confirms that the Americans had to see if the atomic bombs had worked. In source C, it corroborate that the bomb had cost $2000 million just to develop, and would be very difficult to not use the bomb after so much money being spend on that bomb.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work