• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the dropping of the atomuc bombs justified? - source related study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WAS THE DROPPING F THE ATOMIC BOMBS JUSTIFIED? I think that source A does prove that the use of atomic bombs was necessary for America to win the war against the war against Japan. I assume this because of the manner of Henry Stimson describing how courageous and immense the Japanese army is, 'The Allies would be faced with the enormous task of destroying a force of five million men and 5000 suicide aircraft, belonging to a race that would fight to the death'. The way that Henry Stimson describe the Japanese, is that it was impossible for the Americans to defeat the Japanese without the use of a perilous weapon such as the atomic bomb, as if the Americans did not use the atomic bomb, it would be very difficult for the Americans to destroy a 5 million valiant Japanese men who would 'fight to the death'. Source B is published in 1945 by the British. In the cartoon it has information saying 'Japan was seeking peace before the first atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. ...read more.

Middle

Source E is more reliable than source D from my opinion, President Truman's advisor as a citizen of America announced 'The use of this barbarous weapon was no help to our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated'. From this resource, I suggest that America dropped the two hazardous bombs on Hiroshima and one on Nagasaki for 'fun' as this I consider is an act of terrorism destroying a enormous number of innocent lives without an excuse apart from Pearl Harbour, which there was a huge life loss, but from my consideration America didn't have to drop bombs on a immensely populated city like Hiroshima or Nagasaki, but they could have destroyed Japan's military bases, as the Japanese soldiers were prepared to die. Source C, published by the campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, revealed that the bomb cost $2000 million just to develop, and it would have been a 'waste' if the Americans did not use it, and Nagasaki was just an excuse of trying out the second type. ...read more.

Conclusion

This suggest that America was confident of defeating Japan, but they were scared to lose a predicted half a million American soldiers. So if America didn't want to lose this large total of American lives they had to strike Japan with minimal loss, to drop the two bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Source K is a fairly reliable source. 'We were under incredible pressure to get the bomb ready before the conference (between the Americans and the Russians).the intention of the president was to say to the Russians that we had a new weapon that we planned to use in Japan and it was very powerful' This verifies that Americans did it to frighten the Russians, and if Americans did not drop the bombs, it would make the Americans look weak as the Russians would have thought the Americans just talk but they do not take action. Source D is not a very reliable source, as even Americans could have defeated the Japanese, America was likely to have a huge life loss. In conclusion I think that America dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in act of revenge of Pearl Harbour. Siju Rajendran 5/4/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    The Japanese had not hesitated planning an attack on Pearl Harbor so the Americans did not hesitate planning an attack on Japan. Although all these sources convince us that the dropping of the atomic bombs was justified they were mostly written by Americans.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    They will go on dying after the bomb has fallen. This will be a completely new horror in war. We began to build this bomb because we feared Hitler, who is now defeated. You want to use it against Japan.

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    The super-critical mass was achieved with a plutonium based bomb. This gave the Americans an edge over Russia, they now had the most powerful weapon in the world thus making them stronger than Russia. However when Staling was informed of the development he failed to comprehend the significance of the

  2. Was it justified for the U.S.A. to drop the atom bomb on Japan?

    They could effectively have been using the Japanese as guinea pigs. Defeat was near for the Japanese anyway; they had lost countless battles, like on the islands of Tarawa and Iwo-Jima, and were continuing to do so. Had the Americans continued to fight on they would have defeated them without

  1. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    It was difficult to conceive any other act which could have rallied the American people more solidly behind declaration of war on Japan." People say that this was one of the biggest mistakes Japan had made. If they did not try to hurt the 'big friendly giant' (in this case America)

  2. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    However, no real negotiation was discussed, because of the negative response from Japan, "Makusatsu", which was also believed to be misinterpreted. The Japanese assumed the emperor, Hirohito and the Japanese officials would be eliminated. Many have strongly believed and argued that Japan would have surrendered if they just negotiated.

  1. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    People living up to two and a half miles away were severely burnt. To emphasize the horrific burns the blast caused, we are shown a young boy. The skin on his back is literally peeling away, and he describes the immense pain he was under during the 20 months he

  2. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    As President Truman's biographer David McCullough suggests, "America had not spend $1.8 billion developing a weapon that could end the war only to put it on the shelf..." (as quoted in Parshall 2). Mr. McCullough indicates that the justification of the multi-billion dollar Manhattan project was an influential factor on

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work