• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the dropping of the atomuc bombs justified? - source related study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WAS THE DROPPING F THE ATOMIC BOMBS JUSTIFIED? I think that source A does prove that the use of atomic bombs was necessary for America to win the war against the war against Japan. I assume this because of the manner of Henry Stimson describing how courageous and immense the Japanese army is, 'The Allies would be faced with the enormous task of destroying a force of five million men and 5000 suicide aircraft, belonging to a race that would fight to the death'. The way that Henry Stimson describe the Japanese, is that it was impossible for the Americans to defeat the Japanese without the use of a perilous weapon such as the atomic bomb, as if the Americans did not use the atomic bomb, it would be very difficult for the Americans to destroy a 5 million valiant Japanese men who would 'fight to the death'. Source B is published in 1945 by the British. In the cartoon it has information saying 'Japan was seeking peace before the first atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. ...read more.

Middle

Source E is more reliable than source D from my opinion, President Truman's advisor as a citizen of America announced 'The use of this barbarous weapon was no help to our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated'. From this resource, I suggest that America dropped the two hazardous bombs on Hiroshima and one on Nagasaki for 'fun' as this I consider is an act of terrorism destroying a enormous number of innocent lives without an excuse apart from Pearl Harbour, which there was a huge life loss, but from my consideration America didn't have to drop bombs on a immensely populated city like Hiroshima or Nagasaki, but they could have destroyed Japan's military bases, as the Japanese soldiers were prepared to die. Source C, published by the campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, revealed that the bomb cost $2000 million just to develop, and it would have been a 'waste' if the Americans did not use it, and Nagasaki was just an excuse of trying out the second type. ...read more.

Conclusion

This suggest that America was confident of defeating Japan, but they were scared to lose a predicted half a million American soldiers. So if America didn't want to lose this large total of American lives they had to strike Japan with minimal loss, to drop the two bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Source K is a fairly reliable source. 'We were under incredible pressure to get the bomb ready before the conference (between the Americans and the Russians).the intention of the president was to say to the Russians that we had a new weapon that we planned to use in Japan and it was very powerful' This verifies that Americans did it to frighten the Russians, and if Americans did not drop the bombs, it would make the Americans look weak as the Russians would have thought the Americans just talk but they do not take action. Source D is not a very reliable source, as even Americans could have defeated the Japanese, America was likely to have a huge life loss. In conclusion I think that America dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in act of revenge of Pearl Harbour. Siju Rajendran 5/4/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    The Potsdam declaration was issued by the USA, China and GB, and even warned the Japanese that they were on the "threshold of annihilation" and would face "prompt and utter destruction" if they did not surrender. The most striking point is that it left an opening for the retention of

  2. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    Kantaro Suzuki, who replaced Kuniaki Koiso on April 1945 as Prime Minister, rejected the Potsdam declaration as a more vague version of the earlier declined proposition. Suzuki mainly wanted to dictate appeasement of the Japanese military, which demeaned the purpose of the idea of 'unconditional surrender', than to benefit anything to the Allies.

  1. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    Impressing Stalin could have been a main reason why the bomb was dropped. Another reason might have been to force an agreement in the dispute between the Soviet Union and the Allies as to what the future of Poland would be.

  2. The Home Front - source related study

    The words on the board at the back read 'When the boys come back we are not going to keep you any longer-girls'. This source is useful to an extent as it infers that it was the opinion of the people writing the message that the importance of the work

  1. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    we were talking about dealing with the people who hadn't hesitated at Pearl Harbor to make a sneak attack destroying not only ships but the lives of many America soldiers." The US government used a lot of propaganda as a way to remind Americans of the attack on Pearl Harbor,

  2. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    one point it seemed inevitable that the invasion force was going to have to pull out. Japan was an extremely proud nation with a tradition of warrior courage, a code had been passed down from the Shogun times that surrender was unacceptable.

  1. WAS THE DROPPING F THE ATOMIC BOMBS JUSTIFIED?

    this implies that the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was just testing that if the bomb was a success, and this means that America was extremely careless of the colossal number of lives lost and the homeless. Source C supports source B very much.

  2. The Home Front 1914-1918, Women and work - source related study.

    The social change that was brought on from the change of jobs intimidated men as women were now able to have more freedom mostly because of the money they were earning which meant that they were able to spend more money on themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work