• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the entry of the USA into the First World War in 1917 the decisive factor in deciding its outcome?

Extracts from this document...


Was the entry of the USA into the First World War in 1917 the decisive factor in deciding its outcome? Many people view the American entry into World War one as a decisive moment, which I would agree with, however I am not so sure that this was the most crucial part of the Allies losing the War. However I do think that the Germans overlooked them as a military threat. Admiral Capelle had told members of the German parliament "America from a military point of view means nothing" A statement that the whole of Germany will regret. I think one other main clause for the Germans losing the war was the failures of The Schlieffen's Plan. Alfred Von Schlieffen's 1906 plan had outlined a way to conquer France and Belgium in a little more than a month. Germany had been always looking for quick ways of doing things, when it is more often than not the slow and steady who wins the race. ...read more.


Lunacy comes to mind unless the high command really had the belief that their also weak army would somehow spring to life and fight like they had never fought before. It is often said that the two enemies became more experienced and better fighters as the war continued, it would also be expected that tactics from the war of attrition are not necessary for a quick end to conflict. The tactics which involved sending men out of the trenches, but the simple fact that as soon as men were out of their now sophisticated trench systems they were vulnerable and experience heavy casualties. Which was on good for a nation so short on men they were encouraging people to have more children and get married earlier, which wasn't much use for the Great War. Attempting to win the war using infantry was not feasible, an advance means a resort back to the horrors of the Somme, extending the line and using up valuable manpower. ...read more.


Once again someone was quicker than the Germans. Separating the Allies had recently become considerably harder anyway as they were no longer fighting like two countries, they were now a fused fighting machine under General Foch. The German attack ran out of steam, their bigheaded nature also meant there was a lack of back up planning; failure didn't appear in their dictionary. The Joint Leadership of the Allied forces was a key factor in the failures of the spring offensives. The countries could no longer blame each other, they were united as one force to defeat the Germans, they had showed they were stronger than previous allies Russia who had crumbled, the war on two fronts was over, could the tides turn? While the Allies lost Russia, Germany also lost their help in the east from the previously buoyant ally Austria. They were not only a means of military support but also a way of providing thee armies with food and shells to fire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    which meant that both sides were equally matched, however the American entry gave the Allies an advantage and helped break the stalemate. Question a) Study Sources A and B How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

  2. The First World War - Explain how the Schieffen Plan was mean to work.

    However, Winston Churchill, head of the navy, thought that the idea had potential and his department funded its development. These first machines only moved at walking pace. They weren't very manoeuvrable and were very unreliable - more than half of them broke down before they got to German trenches.

  1. Were any of these fronts as important as the Western Front in deciding the ...

    vast significance that the Western Front played on the outcome of the war. The other major front in size and resources was the Eastern Front. Contrary to the doomed Schlieffen plan the Russians did attack on a large scale more rapidly that the German Command had calculated and first the

  2. Was the entry of the USA into the First World War in 1917 the ...

    By the time Russia withdrew, Germany had lost millions of men anyway. Another significant event that had an influence on the outcome of the war was the failure of the German Spring Offensives, which were launched on the 21st March 1918.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Tactically, it allowed the PLO time to reinforce its military strength in southern Lebanon. The Soviet Union refused to provide the PLO with weapons, but PLO emissaries purchased arms from East European countries and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), acquiring Grad and Katyusha artillery rockets and antiquated but functional T-34 tanks.

  2. In What Ways Did The First World War Affect The Lives Of People At ...

    Source A2(ii) shows the growing need for men on the western front and in the end Lloyd George won the battle against and the "5 questions for men who have not enlisted" was published and so the attitude of the Welsh to recruit rose considerably.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work