• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Hiroshima Bomb Necessary?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Hiroshima Bomb Necessary? 0261 - 012 IB History SL Ivan La Bruna May 2002 Word Count : 2325 Was the Hiroshima Bomb Necessary? During the middle of the twentieth century countries were involved in one of the most deadly wars of the century. European countries already had a war at the beginning of the century but they weren't able to avoid a second world war that involved also non-European countries. The expansion of the war made the alliances even bigger to the extent that there was too much power between the alliances causing the war to be inevitable. The countries started to war and slowly ran out of supplies and soldiers, this made alliances stronger and bigger because support was needed to continue war. The alliances would always end up to balance out because they prevented each other to have more power, as a result countries lost hopes for a closer end of war. The United States, to balance out the power and to solve their economic problems caused by the war, decided to join the war. Once in the war they also noticed that there was no hope to stop war quickly so they came to a solution, due to the circumstances, that war would stop if they would have dropped a disastrous atomic bomb over Japan. ...read more.


That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians", when in reality the United States Strategic Bombing Survey stated in 1946 that the cities, "Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as targets because of their concentration of activities and population" Mark Weber stated that "President Harry Truman, the killing of tens of thousands of Japanese civilians was simply not a consideration in his decision to use the atom bomb" because after the Hiroshima atomic bomb was dropped they dropped another one in Nagasaki and they mass killed most of the Japanese people destroying and burning the city of Tokyo creating a lot of prejudice among Americans about the Japanese. (Mark Weber) The problem that might have been would be the fact President of the United States was changed, Franklin Roosevelt was the President when the war began but on the 4th of December, 1945, he died and Harry S. Truman became president since he was the Vice President. He probably was unprepared for his new office to face the problem of war considering the mistakes he did but since no one expected the death of Roosevelt during such a critical moment, felt ready. A vice president has to represent the president that he is being replaced but Truman didn't actually replace Roosevelt with his own ideas because Roosevelt was against the bombing of civilians while Truman knew he was bombing civilians and that the atomic bomb was a terrible weapon. ...read more.


Truman's anger was so great that he wanted to seek revenge ,and the feeling of revenge started to spread around to the point that soldiers said, "Thank God for the atom bomb" giving more importance to the bomb rather than God itself because of the end of the war. (Mark Weber) United States made the wrong decision and was not able to see the consequences of the atomic bomb because they were blinded by revenge. But it isn't entirely their fault because if they were brought to do something so bad it was because of war and of people fighting for power. The fact that no one wanted to stop the war brought countries to enter a desperate situation. United States acted without thinking deeply about the consequences, they were full of anger and wanted to seek revenge because of the surprise attacks on Pearl Harbor and also to stop war to not see any more deaths. The fault was of the situation in which the world was in, war had to prevented and war should have been stopped, the fault therefore lies mainly on the countries who weren't able to control these factors. United States and Japan were not able to stop their war against each other and their situation did not able them to stop war. Countries after what happened will learn hopefully from their mistakes to avoid certain situations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    She must of thought that mankind must be so cruel to do such a terribly thing. A British journalist had said 'people who were not only injured in the bombing are still dying mysteriously and horribly from a unknown something which I can only describe as the atomic plague'.

  2. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    would have fought on and hundreds of thousands of prisoners in his power would have been killed. Even if we had not been deliberately massacred, we were near our physical end through lack of food." America and England recognized that the Communist Soviet Union was going to be a major

  1. To what extent did the United States force Japan to attack Pearl Harbor and ...

    but not "The Japanese and Germany". All these implied that to American, German was good, but Nazi was devious and the same as Japs (Japanese) or Nips (Nippon, the Japanese of Japan). At home front, Japanese were treated as subhuman; they were forced to move inside America.

  2. American History.

    In return for sacrifices equality of opportunity would prevail, eventually creating a merit-based "natural aristocracy." Another was held by other members of the elite and some skilled craftsman? [ex. Alexander Hamilton] and was more about economics, drawing on Adam Smith's theories about individual self-interest leading for the best for the community.

  1. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    Any decision made by Truman that would have allowed for the Japanese to take more American lives or seemingly shown sympathy for Japan by not dropping the bombs would have been entirely unacceptable. Given the necessity for Truman to justify the Manhattan project and appease the American public it is

  2. History course work bombing of Hiroshima

    would be against any use by any country of using nuclear weapons and so would be against America using nuclear weapons. They are also against using nuclear weapons because it says the Japanese were about to surrender to the Russians which shows if they were about to surrender there was

  1. Bombing of Pearl Harbour

    On the other hand, recall of men on shore leave to the ships in harbor might have led to still more being casualties from bombs and torpedoes, or trapped in ships by shut watertight doors (as the attack alert status have required).

  2. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    As the war developed, almost everything was rationed. Towels, cutlery, furniture, sheets were all in short supply. In 1942, even soap was rationed. Without rationing, Britain would have almost certainly have fallen to Germany. It was only because everyone knew that they were getting the same amount of food as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work