• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Korean War successful in either containing Communism or Removing Communism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Monday, 03 February 2003 Was the Korean War successful in either containing Communism or Removing Communism? In September 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea. South Korea, was controlled by Anti - Communist leaders whilst the North was controlled by Communist leaders. The fact that South Korea was Anti - Communist gained it the support of America. The communist half on the other hand was liberated by the soviet troops, and the south by Americans. The south had the support of the UN behind it, which boosted its power. I will now discuss the war in more depth stating the causes and important events during the war. There was one main reason why the Korean War started. This reason was that there was a bitter hostility between the North's communist Leader Kim IL Sung and the South's President Syngman Rhee. ...read more.

Middle

A few weeks later during the same month of October 1950, 200,000 Chinese volunteers joined the Koreans. They possessed tremendous power and the UN forces ended back up around the 38th parallel. At this point in the war, the leader of the Army Macarthur and Truman the president of the US had a disagreement. Truman felt as though they had achieved what they had set out to do which was good enough. However, Macarthur thought that they should continue and eliminate the communist threat in China by using Nuclear weapons. As there was a high possibility that Russia would enter the war if this happened an attack on China was refused. These warnings seemed to be acknowledged by Macarthur until March 1951 when he made a threat of attack on China. ...read more.

Conclusion

China and Russia the two main communist countries in the war remained communist. I think the future US policy should be to continue to try to contain communism because by trying to defeat it they are putting most of the world on the brink of war. I also believe they should try to contain communism because they were more successful in containing communism than they were in defeating it. Containment does not necessarily mean any war but there is more chance of peace and agreement with containment. However, I also feel that if the evils of communism are as bad as they are made out to be then the aim should be to destroy it completely before it spreads. This is similar to the second world war when Russia who were controlled by communist were allies with the US because they felt that this extreme measure was necessary to defeat Hitler and his evil plans. 1 Ashley Simon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    The Korean War represented total defeat for the Truman Doctrine? H. Brogan. How far ...

    involvement with the Truman Doctrine, as it was the North Korean's who first acted aggressively, pushing the South Korean's into the Pusan Perimeter, which was a tiny area on the Southeast coast of Korea. The North Korean's were also Communist and armed, therefore fulfilling the requirement for Truman to act,

  2. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    Although on paper it looks as if the two Korean governments have made significant strides towards unification, many critics will point to the failures, predominantly on the North's side. The critics do not agree with the turn the other cheek actions and statements Kim Dae Jung has used after the North has broken agreements or promises.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    American business interests, moreover, suggested the importance of retaining German industry as a key to postwar commerce and trade. As a result, Allied policy toward Germany became a shambles. "No one wants to make Germany a wholly agricultural nation again," Roosevelt insisted.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    And now, from their strongholds in Tall al-Za'tar, the PLO forces were shelling the factories and offices of the eastern Christian suburbs of the city. The Kataeb and their allies marked Tall al-Za'tar for destruction The Mountain Offensive In March 1976, the leftist forces and the Palestinians launched an offensive across Mount Sannine to invade the Christian heartland.

  1. Assess the strategic strengths and weaknesses of America's 'containment of communism' policy since 1945.

    "...the German economy is the heart of Europe, and if we do not coordinate that in connection with the rest of Europe, certainly Western Europe will be in difficulties for an interminable procession of years."7 If Germany was to fall to communism then, one of the strongest European industrial infrastructures

  2. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    The F-80 Shooting Star was quickly becoming outdated and there were not enough modern jet fighters, such as the F-86 Sabres, to effectively carry the fight to the enemy. Essentially, it was Air Material Command (AMC), headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base that served as the primary logistics support organization.

  1. The Korean war and the conflict between North and South.

    to.2 The line was drawn strictly on a map and had no practical relation to the land. The Russians accepted to the surprise of the Americans, who were far away and couldn't do anything if the Russians decided to push all the way south.

  2. The Fall of Communism in Russia.

    imposed to stop dissension and increase conformity to the new governments policies. Lenin died in 1924, and was quickly followed by Joseph Stalin as head of the Soviet Communist Party, the oppressive reforms started by Lenin were continued and at length became completely totalitarian.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work