• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Korean War successful in either containing Communism or Removing Communism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Monday, 03 February 2003 Was the Korean War successful in either containing Communism or Removing Communism? In September 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea. South Korea, was controlled by Anti - Communist leaders whilst the North was controlled by Communist leaders. The fact that South Korea was Anti - Communist gained it the support of America. The communist half on the other hand was liberated by the soviet troops, and the south by Americans. The south had the support of the UN behind it, which boosted its power. I will now discuss the war in more depth stating the causes and important events during the war. There was one main reason why the Korean War started. This reason was that there was a bitter hostility between the North's communist Leader Kim IL Sung and the South's President Syngman Rhee. ...read more.

Middle

A few weeks later during the same month of October 1950, 200,000 Chinese volunteers joined the Koreans. They possessed tremendous power and the UN forces ended back up around the 38th parallel. At this point in the war, the leader of the Army Macarthur and Truman the president of the US had a disagreement. Truman felt as though they had achieved what they had set out to do which was good enough. However, Macarthur thought that they should continue and eliminate the communist threat in China by using Nuclear weapons. As there was a high possibility that Russia would enter the war if this happened an attack on China was refused. These warnings seemed to be acknowledged by Macarthur until March 1951 when he made a threat of attack on China. ...read more.

Conclusion

China and Russia the two main communist countries in the war remained communist. I think the future US policy should be to continue to try to contain communism because by trying to defeat it they are putting most of the world on the brink of war. I also believe they should try to contain communism because they were more successful in containing communism than they were in defeating it. Containment does not necessarily mean any war but there is more chance of peace and agreement with containment. However, I also feel that if the evils of communism are as bad as they are made out to be then the aim should be to destroy it completely before it spreads. This is similar to the second world war when Russia who were controlled by communist were allies with the US because they felt that this extreme measure was necessary to defeat Hitler and his evil plans. 1 Ashley Simon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Assess the strategic strengths and weaknesses of America's 'containment of communism' policy since 1945.

    It is down already. The two pins in the second row are Burma and Indochina. If they go, the three pins in the next row; Siam, Malaya, and Indonesia are pretty sure to topple in their turn. And if all the rest of Asia goes, the resulting psychological, political and

  2. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    However, despite the setbacks, the North and South are closer than ever. Of course the two governments have not unified at all, but economic reunification has started and building. Some projects include tourism development in Mt. Geumgang, linkage of railroads and roadways across the DMZ, and a joint North-South industrial

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Congress and the American people, meanwhile, seemed to be turning against postwar economic aid. A public opinion poll in December 1944 showed that 70 percent of the American people believed the Allies should repay their lend-lease debt in full. Taking up the cry for fiscal restraint, Senator Arthur Vandenberg told

  2. Free essay

    The Korean War represented total defeat for the Truman Doctrine? H. Brogan. How far ...

    This is immediately supported by the fact that the USA supplied not only troops to help fight the world, but also $150million in February 1950, although it had been delayed up to this point since 1948. This money was for economic rehabilitation, education and government improvements, and shows American economic support.

  1. The Korean war and the conflict between North and South.

    China and the USSR.6The people of Korea were shocked and angered at this as there hopes of an independent Korea were diminishing. By, 1946, the domestic Korean scene was dominated by a nationalist movement divided into two poles: the leftist supporting the Moscow agreement and the rightists opposing the trusteeship.7

  2. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    However, the Japanese would retaliate by arriving into Korea in large numbers of the Japanese army during the Second World War. This is the buildup to Korea's participation in the Second World War alongside Japan. After the Second World War had ended in 1945, it was agreed upon during the

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    Not only did it have to procure planes such as transports and fighters, but supply, maintenance, modification, repair, and of course, material acquisition.5 Every Air Force function, from support to combat machines involved in the Korean War depended on AMC.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The break up of the army made the ratio worse for the Christian based parties as the result was 46,600 left wing troops against 15,000 right wing troops. The Opening Rounds, 1975 By the mid 1970s PLO conduct in Lebanon had reached incredible lows.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work