• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the nobility the most important factor in destabilising France in the years leading to the outbreak of civil war in France in 1562?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the nobility the most important factor in destabilising France in the years leading to the outbreak of civil war in 1562? The outbreak of civil war among the French in 1562 may be perceived simply as an unexpected occurrence with regard to the change of rule three years earlier, when Henry II died from injuries after a jousting competition on 30th June to celebrate the two marriages permitted by the Treaty of Cateau-Cambresis. Largely known as the period of Renaissance Monarchy, the rules of Francis I and Henry II are often associated with moderate successes in terms of religion and foreign policy, and the authority of the crown was never diminished. The rule of Francis II was clearly preceded by monarchs of greater competence; during his reign, disturbances among the noble families had a prominent role in destabilising France, but they were not the only such factor. Economic issues, religion and the system of clientage had a similar effect, alongside the predominant role of the King's regent and mother, Catherine de Medici. Francis' feeble rule created a power vacuum between the rival noble families. ...read more.

Middle

The system of clientage alongside religious allegiance was a significant destabilising factor. The Guises, Chatillons and Bourbons had long been building up power-bases of their own in the countryside and the creation of governorships allowed the great nobles to be virtually independent rulers in parts of the kingdom. In the sixteenth century, the French nobility increasingly turned to the aristocratic families to secure pensions through employment or protection and this 'bastard feudalism' led to the growing power and influence of the families. Such a system could indeed have been beneficial to the monarchy in that each part of the pyramidal structure was dependent on the monarchy and could buttress royal authority. However, the growth of Calvinism (constituting around 10% of the population by 1562) and the ongoing loyalty of the Guise to Catholicism inevitably led to riots in the towns and countryside; clients often followed their lords in terms of religious belief. When the Guise took charge of the treasury in 1559, over two million livres of court expense was cut and when they were rewarded with more financial favours, a flock of noblemen gave their support to the family. ...read more.

Conclusion

In practice, the so-called Tumult of Amboise was indiscreet, though had used forged letters from John Calvin to gain support from fellow nobles in attempting to capture the young King in order that Conde could be placed in power. Despite its failure, the plot suggests much about the reasons for civil war eventually breaking out in France - the combination of religious rivalry and factional politics was extremely destabilising during this period and class allegiance played an ongoing role in maintaining divisions between the factions. The outbreak of French civil war in 1562 can be attributed primarily to the weak monarchy. Even the very fact that Francis II could not rule alone was destabilising in its presentation of weakness and Catherine de Medici's regency was frequently misdirected. It is clear that the regency itself formed a strong secondary cause for the outbreak of civil war. However, a combination of religious, political and economic factors proved destabilising during the rule of the two young monarchs, alongside the legacy of fault from previous reigns, particularly the great French debt from the Habsburg-Valois wars. The nobility did play a pivotal role and the monarchy lacked a centralised control of the country and common laws. It was in this context that disorder leading to civil war was inevitable. History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    them, but their economy has been ruined and Louis must accept that he can no longer expect to take territory with minimal opposition. We thus begin to see the debt forming which Louis XVI will inherit, one of the major causes for the French Revolution.

  2. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * No - did not represent the views of the entire country, the economic grievances that motivated them were specific - two years of bad harvests, enclosures and entry fines. These issues did not affect the population in other areas of the country.

  1. The Spanish Civil War

    and a miners' uprising in Asturias (Spanish Revolution of 1934), which was put down forcefully by the troops commanded by General L�pez Ochoa and the Legionnaires commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Juan Yag�e, under the direction of Minister of War Diego Hidalgo.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    The reasons for such success are different. Firstly, Crusader leaders were well motivated both religiously and personally. Believing that God is ?on their side? they put maximum efforts in achieving their goals. Also personal goals such as, perhaps, increasing wealth could push some to work and fight harder on their way.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    The Government avoided drastic social and political change, so as not to give rise to other similar rebellions: Christian missionaries were withdrawn; princes would not be deposed, provided that their states accepted ?British overlordship and advice,?[10] and greater care was given to land holders rights.

  2. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    Therefore, this statement is valid. ________________ [1] Heinemann Advanced History: The Modernisation of Russia 1856-1985 [2] Agricultural Productivity Growth in Russia 1861-1913.

  1. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    However being an intellectual was clearly not the only characteristic he needed to possess to run a vast country with a population of 160 million. Nicholas did not appear strong and powerful mentally, like his predecessors; he was intolerant of anyone outside his office and had an inability to make decisions.

  2. Maos Leadership was the crucial factor in the Communists winning the 1945 Civil War. ...

    The use of guerrilla warfare against the GMD in the civil war meant that the CCP could emerge from most of their battles in success. The people?s liberation army (PLA) were greatly outnumbered by the GMD. However, the PLA?s use of guerrilla tactics often put the GMD into tricky situations, leading to more victories for the PLA with fewer casualties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work