• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the nobility the most important factor in destabilising France in the years leading to the outbreak of civil war in France in 1562?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the nobility the most important factor in destabilising France in the years leading to the outbreak of civil war in 1562? The outbreak of civil war among the French in 1562 may be perceived simply as an unexpected occurrence with regard to the change of rule three years earlier, when Henry II died from injuries after a jousting competition on 30th June to celebrate the two marriages permitted by the Treaty of Cateau-Cambresis. Largely known as the period of Renaissance Monarchy, the rules of Francis I and Henry II are often associated with moderate successes in terms of religion and foreign policy, and the authority of the crown was never diminished. The rule of Francis II was clearly preceded by monarchs of greater competence; during his reign, disturbances among the noble families had a prominent role in destabilising France, but they were not the only such factor. Economic issues, religion and the system of clientage had a similar effect, alongside the predominant role of the King's regent and mother, Catherine de Medici. Francis' feeble rule created a power vacuum between the rival noble families. ...read more.

Middle

The system of clientage alongside religious allegiance was a significant destabilising factor. The Guises, Chatillons and Bourbons had long been building up power-bases of their own in the countryside and the creation of governorships allowed the great nobles to be virtually independent rulers in parts of the kingdom. In the sixteenth century, the French nobility increasingly turned to the aristocratic families to secure pensions through employment or protection and this 'bastard feudalism' led to the growing power and influence of the families. Such a system could indeed have been beneficial to the monarchy in that each part of the pyramidal structure was dependent on the monarchy and could buttress royal authority. However, the growth of Calvinism (constituting around 10% of the population by 1562) and the ongoing loyalty of the Guise to Catholicism inevitably led to riots in the towns and countryside; clients often followed their lords in terms of religious belief. When the Guise took charge of the treasury in 1559, over two million livres of court expense was cut and when they were rewarded with more financial favours, a flock of noblemen gave their support to the family. ...read more.

Conclusion

In practice, the so-called Tumult of Amboise was indiscreet, though had used forged letters from John Calvin to gain support from fellow nobles in attempting to capture the young King in order that Conde could be placed in power. Despite its failure, the plot suggests much about the reasons for civil war eventually breaking out in France - the combination of religious rivalry and factional politics was extremely destabilising during this period and class allegiance played an ongoing role in maintaining divisions between the factions. The outbreak of French civil war in 1562 can be attributed primarily to the weak monarchy. Even the very fact that Francis II could not rule alone was destabilising in its presentation of weakness and Catherine de Medici's regency was frequently misdirected. It is clear that the regency itself formed a strong secondary cause for the outbreak of civil war. However, a combination of religious, political and economic factors proved destabilising during the rule of the two young monarchs, alongside the legacy of fault from previous reigns, particularly the great French debt from the Habsburg-Valois wars. The nobility did play a pivotal role and the monarchy lacked a centralised control of the country and common laws. It was in this context that disorder leading to civil war was inevitable. History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    The war had a devastating effect on the economy of both sides, with Childs arguing "The strain of paying and feeding huge concentrations of soldiers reduced England to a fiscal crisis while France stumbled to peace under the weight of a shattered economy".

  2. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * No - did not represent the views of the entire country, the economic grievances that motivated them were specific - two years of bad harvests, enclosures and entry fines. These issues did not affect the population in other areas of the country.

  1. How important was the role of the princes in bringing about the success of ...

    If it hadn't been for the printing press at this time then Luther would never have been able to publish his work and so keep the momentum of the struggle forwards.

  2. The First English Civil War

    orders, the rebels were, in addition, bourgeois, while the soldiers of fortune from the German wars felt all the regulars' contempt for citizen militia. Thus, in the first episodes of the First Civil War, moral superiority tended to be on the side of the King.

  1. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    Nicholas was said ?I never wanted to become one I know nothing of the business of ruling?. There was no doubt that Nicolas was not academically intelligent; he could speak 3 languages, an extremely quick learner, hardworking and extensively polite.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Among the dead was Walter Golyakov. Sultan Kilic Arslan, hoped to defeat the new enemy forces in the same easy way, and therefore did not take seriously the approaching enemy. But he was cruelly disappointed. His easy armed, with bows and arrows, cavalry was easily defeated by Western cavalry in open battle.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    The uprising revealed a growing readiness to act and demonstrate protests against British rule, and although Brendon argues that ?two thirds of the country remained absolutely passive,?[8] a substantial number of people came out in protest. Thus, the British actions gradually provoked nationalist feeling in the wider population, ninety years before eventual independence.

  2. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    their job and their perks for life.?[32] Brezhnev allowed farmers to work on state own plots which motivated them to produce as much as possible in order to sell the surplus[33]. This, in theory, should have been beneficial and shows that Brezhnev was trying to improve the economy through new methods however, he was not so lucky.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work