• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the role of external forces more a source for stability than instability in Middle East between 1945 and 2000

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the role of external forces more a source for stability than instability in Middle East between 1945 and 2000? External forces refer to states or international organisations from outside the region. Middle East refers to the Palestinians and Israelis over the land issue and Arab hostility to Israel due to sympathy for the Palestinians, Arab nationalism and Islamic fundamentalism. The US, USSR, Britain, France, Norway and the UN involvement with the Arab-Israeli conflict have brought about its share of both stability and instability to Middle East. However, real efforts to bring peace and stability to Middle East only began in the early 1970s. External forces have been a source of instability in Middle East but up to 1956. After British withdrew hastily from Palestine, UN took over and divided Palestine between Jews and Palestinians. Despite having a larger population, the Palestinians were given a smaller portion of land. ...read more.

Middle

The superpowers continued and increased involvement after 1967. USSR increased support for the radical Arab states and also spent billions to develop port facilities in Egypt to support their naval presence in the eastern Mediterranean. The US too began to view Israel as a strategic asset, a bulwark against the Soviets and its clients and a bastion or order in the region. US support for Israel for non-Cold War reasons has contributed to instability throughout this period. America has not only funded and armed Israel but it has also contributed to instability by failing to restrain Israel and force to make peace. This is prevalent by US vetoes of UN resolutions condemning Israel. This held back the process of passing a resolution and bringing peace and stability to Middle East. On top of that, US acted as a contributor to rise of Islamic fundamentalism. Hamas was formed as a reaction against continued Israeli occupation and to express their desire to create Palestinian Islamic state on all of Israel. ...read more.

Conclusion

The superpowers were more actively involved in the 1973 war. The last phase of the war despite being the most serious superpower confrontation in the Middle East, they eventually worked together to stop the fighting. At the 1979 Camp David Accords, Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty, the first between Israel and an Arab state with US mediation. Mostly importantly, the role of the Norwegians in facilitating the 1993 Oslo Accords which offered the possibility, for the first time, of a two state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian issue. In the 1991 Madrid Conference, USSR, US and Spain invited leaders from the Middle East to Madrid to discuss possible peace proposals, which later developed into the Oslo Accords. The Oslo Declaration included recognition of Israel?s right to exist, PLO as official representative of Palestinian people and the end of us of violence. In conclusion, after 1973, it is possible to suggest that external forces became more a force for stability as superpower rivalry in the Middle East ceased, and as the US began to play a larger role as peacemaker. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    the US vetoed resolutions which called for the end of Israeli settlements which Clinton and Rabin had promised the end of. What these consistent trends by the US show is their pivotal role in allowing Israel to not just go undeterred in their illegal actions, but completely undermining and blocking

  2. UN Middle East 1947

    20%).8 This point largely doesn't take into account that the remaining land was state-owned land - meaning that 73% of Mandate Palestine's land was to be inherited to the state that would accept it. It also fails to understand that the issue isn't private land, but sovereignty - the Arabs

  1. In why the United States withdrew its' forces in 1973

    Punji stake traps were dug out pits filled with razor sharp stakes and then covered over with leaves and twigs to conceal them in their natural environment. These bunkers provided a quick escape for the Vietcong after they had launched a guerilla attack on US troops.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    prepared for war and had the support of eight Arab nations behind him. The Arabs were confident of the military aid that they were going to receive from Russia and they weren't wrong as they were supplied with vast supplies of the latest weapons in order to fight against Israel.

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    This cruel description of the massacre is seen as propaganda by the Jews, who believe that the town was a reasonable target for the military forces, that efficient warnings were given by the soldiers to the residents, and that the men were Arab extremists whom fought a fierce battle with the Israeli soldiers over the day.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    This struggle becomes a vital issue for most of the influential countries in the world. In the Middle East, which the Gulf region is a part of, this struggle coincided with the American attempts to evict Britain from the region and Britain's own attempts to cling to her influence in the region through her response to the American attempts.

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict - source related study.

    and provenance and the fact we know that there were other dimensions not mentioned make it impossible to say that other countries caused the war. 4. Source E claims that the Israeli�s are to blame for causing the war due to their constant acts of aggression towards Syria and its Arab people under the urging and backing of USA.

  2. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    The Israeli forces stopped 10 miles short of the canal, allowing the British and French troops to protect the canal. The British and French forces then attacked and occupied the Canal Zone. This led to enormous outrage throughout the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work