• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Use of the Atomic Bomb Moral?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Use of the Atomic Bomb Moral? Time and time and again we have been told that the world has never gone through a nuclear war. The truth is, however, that the allies used nuclear weapons to end the Second World War. When looking back at the casualties, one cannot bare but to ask himself one question: Was it necessary to use the atomic bomb to win what many saw as a war that had already been won? Thousands upon thousands of casualties, many of whom were civilian, were the direct cause of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; would there have been more casualties had the allies fought the old fashioned way? Thus, the controversial question of morality still exists. Different views answer the question differently but it still comes down to one popular answer, the use of the atomic bomb was an immoral act. Science without ethics is probably the most dangerous tool in the hands of mankind. Physicists that designed the atomic bomb were horrified with their creation when they saw the awesome power it had to destroy lives; this is only one example of the destruction of science unrestrained by ethics. The massive destructive power that the bomb had was beyond common perception and everybody involved with its creation knew that it was not meant for complete military purposes. Weapons of mass destruction rarely target locations that are completely for defense purposes. ...read more.


This premise paradoxically sanctions the use of killing as a means of preserving life. Science is used to introduce new and im moral mechanisms which are historically permanent and intensify violence. Human talents that could have improved humanity are abandoned for more violent pursuits. In this capacity, scientists use their skills to destroy their brothers, convincing themselves that their efforts are humanitarian. The creators of the gasses, "like bargain hunters, imagined they were spending a pittance of tens of thousands of lives to save a purseful more" (Rhodes, 95). Using science this way for the preservation of life is morally bankrupt; human lives are not guaranteed. Every time a scientific development-such as gassing-is used to kill more efficiently, a destructive precedent is established for future generations to supersede. Thus, the nature of science is perverted, establishing a new standard of human cruelty; ironically, the occupation that discovers cures for illness also develops methods of mass destruction. Despite ethical obligations, scientists should not be held responsible for every application of their work because they cannot predict the future. Ethical responsibilities do not obligate a scientist to improve society but to at least morally question his work. It is when deliberate research is conducted for destructive purposes and rationalized as humanitarian that great dilemmas arise. Historically, the destruction during WWI established a precedent for using atomic weapons and saturation bombing in World War II. ...read more.


Edward Teller, a Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution and physicist most widely known for his contributions to the first demonstration of thermonuclear energy maintains that the atomic bomb was put to good and moral use on Japan. Teller maintains that "Science considers what is true, starting out with almost unimaginable ideas" (Teller 23). Thus, the job of science is to put ideas together in a large and logical pattern. Therefore, it is the job of the politicians to decide whether science can be put to good use. Raised as an anti-Communist, he saw what many politicians saw, that nuclear weapons were useful in deterring enemy aggression. Could this same argument have been applicable to the Japanese situation? Teller states that: "The developed nations have paid a great price in terms of their national resources in their strenuous effort to protect life, to safeguard peace. They displayed sufficient wisdom to overcome the traditional inclinations toward military solutions of world problems. This has happened for the first time. And it has provided an abiding pattern to apply new, peaceful and joint approaches to solving the most acute world problems. For the first time in world history, the most powerful weapons ever created were not used. Instead, they became an instrument of human experience, the means of great discoveries, and the tool of deep penetration into the secrets of Nature. We trust it will henceforth and forever take its deserved place among the sophisticated tools of enlightened generations" (Teller 28). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    Because he couldn't risk sending his fleet across the British channel he tried to take out our air bases, but because he failed to gain air superiority he changed tackics. He was hoping that the British civilians could be so demoralised by the relentless dropping of bombs that they would force Churchill to surrender.

  2. Free essay

    Did America drop the bomb in revenge, to prevent the USSR spreading, so Truman ...

    The Potsdam declaration was issued by the USA, China and GB, and even warned the Japanese that they were on the "threshold of annihilation" and would face "prompt and utter destruction" if they did not surrender. The most striking point is that it left an opening for the retention of

  1. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    Throughout this scene we revisit the bus stop bench at regular intervals, if only for a few seconds, why does the director chose to do this? I feel it detracts from the conflicting and powerful emotions Forrest is feeling, the tension is broken, so a humorous atmosphere can be built up.

  2. American History.

    *Jamestown's Struggle for Survival* - The most concise way to express the first years would be absolutely terrible luck. The colonists faced a myriad of problems, most of which they were not responsible for. For instance... They just happened to arrive during a severe drought.?

  1. Pros and Cons - The use of the Atomic Bomb.

    On the week of August 6, 1945, the first and the last atomic bombs ever used during war were dropped on Japan, vaporizing two of its largest cities. The act of dropping these bombs can be considered a terrible act against humanity.

  2. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    The reason that Japan did not like this was because they were trying to take China over, and if the Americans helped the Chinese, they (the Japanese) would face tougher opposition. Both American and British Governments had done everything to place obstacles in front of Japan.

  1. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    These political and diplomatic motives also influenced his decision. If dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been President Truman's only choice that would end the war in the Pacific his decision would have been incontestably justified. However, alternative courses of action existed and upon their evaluation it is

  2. In 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the Americans ...

    It was thought that these casualties would exceed the number of people killed as a result of dropping several atom bombs. The fact that many people could be killed if Japan was invaded was foremost in Truman's mind while he was deciding whether to order the atomic bomb to be used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work