• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was USA losing cold war

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was the USA losing the Cold War 1949-1960? During this period the USA was increasingly concerned with its global position and the need to contain the growing threat of international communism. The period started badly with the 'fall' of China to communism in 1949. The measure of US success in the Cold War at this time depends upon perception of the American position and whether the USA was content to keep communism contained or showed a willingness to 'roll back' the influence of the USSR and communist expansion. The USA showed different levels of success and failure in different regions and with different technologies. American success overall was much higher than critics have suggested. In 1949 the USA held the nuclear monopoly, this gave an additional force to US diplomacy throughout the world. With the development of the Soviet A-bomb, nuclear stalemate was established. This was a setback for the Americans who then carried out a massive investment programme to develop the more powerful H-bomb, the US dismay it took the Soviets only a year to catch up on this new technology. Although the USA was not behind in this part of the Cold War, the loss of advantage was acutely felt within Washington and broader American society, fear of the Bomb and the effects of radiation were common in US culture and attitudes. ...read more.

Middle

This led to increased military spending in the USA, up from $15 billion to $50 billion per annum. With the 'bomber gap' patched up, concern after 1957 switched to missiles. The Soviet lead in the space race was a clear propaganda coup for Khrushchev, the launch of Sputnik in 1957 and the first man in space in 1961 were clear landmarks which the US had missed out on. The early failures of the American space programme also gave the interpretation that the USA were losing the technological battle in the Cold War. The US response with the creation and high funding of NASA showed that the USA was not willing to see itself as behind in the frontiers of new technology. The Soviet ability to get a satellite in space meant that they could also launch ICBM which could hit American targets from launch sites within the Soviet Union. There was the perception that this meant the USSR had a distinct lead in warhead delivery systems, in reality the Soviet technology was slipping behind the USA and the numbers of combat-ready missiles they possessed was well below American levels. This was known to the US government through the U2 spy plane programme, the public though perceived this new threat and the Democrats were deeply critical that Eisenhower had allowed a non-existent 'missile gap' to develop. ...read more.

Conclusion

American ideology which placed all socialist independence movements as part of a conspiracy from Moscow, the reality was more to do with peasant hostility to existing elites and nationalist fervour. Policy in SE Asia was one of the clear areas of failure though this would not become clear for another decade. In judging the overall success or failure of the US in the 1950s, there are varied factors to consider. In the military confrontation with the Soviet Union, the USA maintained the advantage in spite of Soviet technology catching up and in the space race overtaking the USA. Communism was contained effectively in all areas of the globe - save Vietnam and Cuba. The USA went to the negotiating tables with the USSR from a position of strength. Popular perception within the USA placed them in a much worse situation than the reality suggested, the 'fall' of Cuba and Vietnam were concerns, propaganda coups for the Soviets in Space and over the U2 crisis made it seem as if the Soviets held the advantage, Khrushchev's confidence suggested a USSR winning the Cold War. The calm and steady policy of Eisenhower, not over-reacting to the new challenges presented, ensured that the USA had maintained advantage in the Cold War without escalating it to a position which would threaten confrontation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was America's policy of containment successful? Use Korea, Cuba and Vietnam ...

    3 star(s)

    In January 1973, President Nixon announced the suspension of offensive action in North Vietnam and cited peace negotiations; Americans had agreed to a cease fire and ended all United States aid to the Saigon regime.

  2. Moon Landing: Conspiracy or Reality?

    With no atmosphere on the moon and therefore no air to diffuse the light, wouldn't stars have to be clearly visible? (Van Bekel) Fig 1 Edwin Aldrin poses for photograph beside U.S. flag. rpt. on NASA: Digital Image Collection But, as NASA responded; "it's difficult to capture something very bright

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Yet with equal justification, Americans resented Soviet ingratitude. "The Russian authorities seem to want to cover up the fact that they are receiving outside help," American Ambassador Standley told a Moscow press conference in March 1943. "Apparently they want their people to believe that the Red Army is fighting this war alone."

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Aoun was reduced by the end April to half of his original military capability. He had lost his air and naval bases, major stocks of 155-mm shells, and 25% of his tank force. The initiative now passed out of his hands permanently.

  1. Why did a gangster culture develop in the USA in the 1920`s to the ...

    They were giving orders, and the rest of the Family were expected to follow them without question. Next in line to the Dons were the Underbosses, who were second in command. He controlled the day-to-day operations of the Family. Followed by the Consigliere or counsellors.

  2. Was it a case of the Nazis losing or the Soviets winning on the ...

    And finally the famous Slaughter City of Stalingrad, later on in the war, this city, standing alone in the South was the biggest city on Hitler's mind, if it fell, then there would be a huge path over the Volga into Eastern Asia.

  1. 1920's USA.

    In actual fact, taxes were decreased to encourage Americans to spend their wages on luxury goods, such as refrigerators or cars. High tariffs on exported goods from overseas meant people were more likely to buy products made in America, thus boosting the country's industries.

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    dialogue between the superpowers led to the ?thaw? in the Cold War. The ?thaw? took on a paradoxical nature. Alongside the spread of conflict and the development of the arms race, superpower relations experienced a diplomatic ?softening? of relations; in comparison to the bitter antagonism of the early Cold War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work