• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Woodrow Wilson right to be a disappointed man when he died?

Extracts from this document...


Was Woodrow Wilson right to be a disappointed man when he died? It is said that Woodrow Wilson died a disappointed man after presidency where he failed to complete his aims; his last defeat was when America had to decline entry from the League of Nations, which was his last aim even though it contradicted his original aims. He started his presidency with the aim to keep well out of world affairs; he even went as far as to say "It would be an irony of fate if my administration had to deal chiefly with foreign affairs" He had little or no experience of dealing with foreign affairs, and as a democrat it was his aim to not get involved with them. His and his secretary of state William Bryans' few views about World politics were that "it was Americas and their role to advance democracy and moral progress in the world". But his statement did in fact turn out to be very ironic, during his time in office as president he got very involved with situations in Mexico, Nicaragua, Haiti and the Dominican Republic and he got America involved in the First World War. His last aims during his presidency were for America to join the League of Nations, with Article X (to provide the League of nations an army). He failed at achieving both his original aim to keep out of foreign affairs and his last aim for America to join the League of Nations, this could have led to Wilson dying as a disappointed man. ...read more.


He also sent troops to the Dominican Republic. These were small failures to reach his aims. Wilson's greatest problem that stopped him keeping out of foreign politics, as he wanted to was the First World War. At fist he was sure that America didn't have to get involved in European problems, the popular opinion was of disbelief that the civilised Europe couldn't sort it's problems out peacefully, and delight that America was not involved in it, keeping to isolationism, "no entangling alliances". Wilson actually said, "America had to be neutral in thought and deed". But the consequences of the war would involve America so secretly Wilson did care about who won the war, because it was in Americas interests for the Allies to win. Also within American society there were different groups who had stuck together or merged together in America, Irish-Americans and German-Americans wanted Britain to lose, but the vast majority had emigrated from Britain, France and Russia, and supported the Allies. To gain a stronger public support from America for the victory of the Allies the question put to the public was "Are you American?" The Allies were seen to be fighting for democracy in Europe, something America also fought for. If the person did not support the Allies they were seen to be not supporting democracy, thus were not American but just an immigrant. The public opinion was won over and Wilson had succeeded in gaining support for the Allies. ...read more.


He also wanted to get Article X as well, which meant that America would provide an army to work for the League of Nations. His demands were too high and he faced much opposition form America. The Republicans also named the 'irreconcilables' were against the League of Nations and Article X. Reservationists wanted to join the League of Nations but without the Article X, , as did the senate. This means that Wilson could have got enough support to join the League of Nations but he would not negotiate to reach his aim, he wanted America to both join the League of Nations and with Article X. In 1920 he and his party were voted out of power, Wilson was ill in health and died soon after, disappointed because he had failed at reaching his aims during his life. If another President had done all the things Wilson did, with the success Wilson had, they would not be disappointed. Wilson achieved many things, he set up a better government in Mexico, gained America respect form the world, gained America much wealth and brought America through a World War with little loss. All his achievements were attained with little cost to America, but gained America much. But because all the things that Wilson did achieve where almost opposite to what he actually wanted he did not do well and in the end he died a disappointed man, his presidency had good aims which at any other time would have been successful but because of the situations he had to cope with he could not carry out and be successful or happy in completing his aims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Successful Was the League in The 1920's and 1930's? The League of ...

    And so if the country could still trade, the League was doing nothing to actually stop them, so they can continue violating whatever laws they see fit. Force was the last measure and had a major flaw; no standing army.

  2. Describe the impact of Progressive ideals on American foreign policy from 1900 to 1917. ...

    When the Colombian Congress rejected the treaty in favor for more money, Roosevelt encouraged Panamanian guerilla and desire for independence from Colombia. This tactic succeeded, and a revolution occurred. The United States promptly recognized the new government of Panama and negotiated a treaty that enabled Americans to build the Panama Canal.

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Besides, the war continued after the occupation of Al-Faw for a relatively long time. However Iran did not benefit at all from this operation, the only benefit that arose from occupying Al-Faw was Iran's ability to hit Kuwait with the missiles and scare her rulers and her inhabitants.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    But this was not forthcoming. But even if some Sunni leaders were willing to support a limited army intervention in Beirut, Jumblatt and the PLO-supported Left were categorically opposed to any kind of army action. Shiite leaders, for their part, were in favour of army intervention.

  1. Woodrow Wilson.

    Right away, Wilson launched into an arduous speaking tour to promote U.S. participation in the new League of Nations. Exhausted, he collapsed with a stroke and became increasingly isolated during his final months in office, seeing no one but his second wife, Edith Galt Wilson, through whom he conducted the affairs of state.

  2. Mao Tse-tung, who began as an obscure peasant, died one of history's great revolutionary ...

    "On this foundation it is possible to accomplish any task whatsoever." The two sentences are a striking summary of his thought. Unlike many great leaders, Mao never exercised, or sought, absolute control over day-to-day affairs. But the man who rose from humble beginnings in a Hunan village became virtually sovereign, if not a living god, to the 800 million Chinese.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work