• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was World War 1 Inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Karaivanova, Katerina 11/5 14 October, 2004 Was World War 1 Inevitable? World War I was a unique event, since it was the first war to involve all major powers of the world. The First World War was inevitable, because of all events that happened prior to it, with exception of the assassination of the Archduke every other cause had a root years earlier, so no matter what, the war would have happened at approximately the same time. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Serbia on June 28, 1914 was the event that directly caused the First World War. (Causes) It was the "spark" for the Great War, but also a coincidence. ...read more.

Middle

Germany, for example, was pretty confident that it can become a major power and was ready to do whatever it takes to become one.( 11.2 Causes) So Germany wanted to fight, in order to get more powerful and control more things. Great Britain, France and Russia had similar if not completely the same goals. Thus, sooner or later they would have fought a war for power. Imperialism was another important feature that caused World War I and that was one of the reasons for the war to be inevitable. (11.2 Causes) Before 1914 European countries were fighting who will get more territory outside Europe, since that brings more raw materials, and possibilities for trading. (11.2 Causes) At a point though, the territory they could get was already divided among them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Throughout the years prior the war, two major alliances appeared in Europe. One was the Triple Alliance between Germany, Italy and Austria - Hungary. (The Causes) The other one was the Entente between Russia and France. (Karpilovski) So, if any of those countries was attacked for one or another reason, all five of them would have to join the war. So even if the direct cause of the war was different than the assassination, all of those countries would have been in war. The First World War was inevitable. Even if the Archduke was not assassinated, the imperialism, desire for power and alliance system would have caused the war anyway. It was just a matter of time, before some of the countries declared war on another one. The assassination just sped up the course of actions, and led to the first Great War in the World History. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The Afghan War was merely the final straw. Soviet troops were withdrawn in 1988. What did Reagan and Gorbachev agree? * In 1986 Gorbachev and Reagan met and agreed to remove Intermediate Range Missiles (SS-20s and Cruise). The INF Treaty, as it was called, was signed in 1986.

  2. Britain 1895-1918 June 2004

    Britain wanted to preserve their Empire and maintain their own European strength. What happens to France and Belgium was unimportant unless Germany or any other country became a direct Naval threat towards Britain. There were economic conflicts between Germany and Britain from 1898 onwards.

  1. American History.

    - Still, after failed attempts at negotiation the US-British relationship went down the drain, especially after the Chesapeake affair in June 1807. Inside US waters, the British ship Leopard fired on the Chesapeake after it refused to be searched for deserters.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    and sovereignty" of Lebanon but on the other hard gave the PLO virtual autonomy, including the right to maintain its own militia forces in certain areas of Lebanon. These provisions of the Melkart Agreement differed greatly from the Cairo Agreement, which preserved the "exercise of full powers in all regions and in all circumstances by Lebanese civilian and military authorities."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work