• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the Puritans or Roman Catholics a Greater Threat to James the First between 1603 and 1606? How successfully had he dealt with them by 1606?

Extracts from this document...


Were the Puritans or Roman Catholics a Greater Threat to James the First between 1603 and 1606? How successfully had he dealt with them by 1606? In the period of James' reign religion formed a very crucial role in almost everybody's life. Religion was so important because it was thought that it determined whether a person's soul would go to heaven or not. The Church of England had been established by a number of acts of Parliament at the start of Elizabeth the first's reign after the upheavals of the mid sixteenth century under Edward and Mary. The Church of England contained elements of deliberate ambiguity. For example, the services were Protestant but they could have a Catholic meaning to them if people wished so. This worked well in short term and people liked this new church but there were extreme Catholics and Protestants who wanted a change. When James came to the throne in 1603 it was these two groups of people who awaited his arrival with anticipation. ...read more.


In the conference, James showed himself to be nearly as hostile as Richard Bancroft to puritan aspirations. Fortunately for the puritans, many bishops were more tolerant and sympathetic than James and Bancroft. In 1604, Convocation passed canons (church regulations) that specifically enforced and defended the very practices puritans disliked (such as bowing the head at the name of Jesus and the use of the sign of the cross in baptism). These articles were a serious blow to many Puritans because they could no longer try to ignore practices of which they disapproved. About 90 puritans who would not conform were deprived of their livings. A much larger number remained within the church, protected by a friendly bishop or merely accepting the inevitable. Puritans complained about this, particularly to Parliament whose consent to canons many thought necessary, but was not obtained. England's Roman Catholics hoped that James would treat them better than Elizabeth had done, since they had supported his mother, Mary Queen of Scots and his wife, Anne of Denmark, had converted to Catholicism. ...read more.


In the aftermath of the plot, Parliament passed new legislation against English Catholics; Catholics were forbidden to live in or near London or to hold public office. Also Recusancy fines were increased and Catholics were required to take a new oath of allegiance which denied the Pope's authority to depose the king. Catholics were happy to demonstrate their political loyalty by taking it. So in conclusion after the Gunpowder plot which was realistically only supported by a few Catholics, the Catholics were no more trouble to James. In conclusion, I feel both the Puritans and the Roman Catholics were of equal threat to James between 1603 and 1606 although the Catholics were more of a threat to James safety because of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Although it must be remembered only a few extreme Catholics were part of this, so it was of not as much of a threat as one may think. By 1606 I feel James had dealt with them well, using measures that were fair and not more extreme than necessary. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jenna Benedict 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    they took the oath of supremacy and swore allegiance to the crown.' In 1590 Elizabeth described fanatical Puritans in a letter to James VI of Scotland as 'a sect of perilous consequence, such as would have no kings but a presbytery'.

  2. Who posed the greater threat to Elizabeth

    In 1571 William Strickland introduced a Bill to Parliament to reform the Prayer Book and abolish the surplice. It was rejected but the Queen was forced to allow the 39 Articles to be given the status of an Act

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    He considered it not to support the theory that kings have divine right to rule, even if they behave badly. James wanted a Bible free of political and theological notes. Apart from minor, nothing else was changed. James recognised the democratic tendencies of Puritanism and suspected that if the people dumped bishops then they might one day dump their king.

  2. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    Historians have argued, however, that such 'classes' were probably not committed to a presbyterian system of ecclesiastical government but simply wanted to meet like-minded brethren to discuss day-to-day parochial concerns. Therefore, although such meetings may have had the potential to be forums for dangerous radical ideology, in reality the main problem for the Queen was non-uniformity.

  1. What Is The Truth About The Gunpowder Plot?

    he would have been up to something if he was found in a cellar with gunpowder in it and carrying matches and a tinder box. I think that this possibility is quite believable, but I don't think it has enough evidence to back it up.

  2. The Portrait of a Lady. Discuss James representations of 'places' for women in this ...

    Miss Havisham illustrates the perilous capacity of independent, propertied women to waste family fortunes upon sharp practitioners dressed in gentlemen's clothing. It is important to take into consideration that this novel was being read against the social backdrop of demand for reform of married women's property rights.

  1. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    Henry also directly bullied the papacy to try to get his divorce. His first attack on the papacy again displayed a reluctance to break from Rome. The Act in Conditional restraint of Annates in 1532 said that in future only 5% of the first year's income of spiritual men should be paid to Rome.

  2. In 1603, when Elizabeth died, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the church ...

    Village communities also clung onto "Catholic rituals and festivities" like ringing bells on "all souls' Eve". Thomas Cartwright's observation about the happenings of the church was that "'Heaps' of people had cast away the old religion without discovering the new".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work