• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main features of the 'just war theory'? Examine and comment on the reasons why some thinkers criticise this theory?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the main features of the 'just war theory'? Examine and comment on the reasons why some thinkers criticise this theory? By Lucy Cox War is commonly known as open armed conflict between two or more parties, nations or states. Within a war the aim is usually to triumph over the opponent by inflicting maximum damage upon them with minimum damage to themselves. The just war theory looks at how situations such as these can be carried out fairly and justly with the minimum amount of suffering possible. In this essay I am going to outline the main characteristics of the just war theory mainly devised by Thomas Aquinas and then decipher how successful it is in determining how workable the theory is in the face of conflict and warfare. The just war theory was first developed by Aristotle and Cicero in 4 BCE who said that war for the purpose of self-defence was justified. It was later expanded on by St. Augustine in the 5th century when the leader of Rome felt that the pacifist Christian attitude of the society was weakening Rome's defences. Many were reluctant to fight believing the teaching of Jesus from the Bible that you must always turn the other cheek, so Augustine justified the idea of war to defend the church in the threatening of the faith. ...read more.

Middle

In the case of civil wars it does not suggest the correct behaviour towards a situation where the current legitimate authority is incompetent. It denies oppressed people the opportunity to defend their rights. It may seem that to avoid the unnecessary destruction of life would be desirable but in the case of a group of oppressed people by their nation leader they would feel that their chances of success in securing their basic human rights would be low. Does this mean that they should not fight; some may say that 'it is better to die standing up than to live kneeling down.' Sometimes can it be right to protest against injustice and give your life even if you cannot win, especially if it is the last resort. The just war theory does not explain what would be the moral thing to do in this case. Pacifists would argue that you could always submit rather than wage war meaning that the last resort would never outcome in war only peace. The just war theory also recognises the need to have a real and certain danger before entering war and that the aim of that war should be to rid the nation of that danger but it is unrealistic to suppose that there would be a single cause or intention in going to war. ...read more.

Conclusion

The just war theory provides criteria for the waging of war and so makes nations think carefully about their decisions and not act unnecessarily. The just war theory is also strong as it can be used as a Christian ethic as its basis is taken from the Bible. Overall the just war theory is probably effective in its reduction of wars occurring if at every conflict the nation considers the criteria before waging war. However these strengths are not strong enough to redeem the just war theory of its weaknesses. It is still too simplistic, ambiguous and impractical to be completely workable. The theory is either going to be too simplistic making generalisations and not considering all aspects of war or too specific and exclude some circumstances. It is completely open to interpretation and with clever manipulation the just war theory could be used to justify many immoral situations in war. It is also unworkable in that many points fail when it is realised that you cannot predict the future and that a war can never be just if both sides are not following the just war theory in which case war would never have started at all. Overall the just war theory can only be applied as guidelines for the waging of wars and not possibly a set of rules. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    "No nation in modern times," Assistant Secretary of State Will Clayton had said, "can long expect to enjoy a rising standard of living without increased foreign trade." America imported from Europe only half of what it exported, and Western Europe was quickly running out of dollars to pay for American goods.

  2. The purpose of my examination of war is to question whether the resort to ...

    Once this fundamental principle of human rights is accepted, it can effectively argued what is wrong with some acts of war, namely aggression against sovereignty and the basic human rights thereof. Within our current system, centred around state sovereignty a fundamental principal is non intervention and non-aggression of one state into the affairs of another states sovereignty.

  1. Must a defensible theory of the morality of war must integrate moral reasoning with ...

    limit war and keep it within a moral framework, in that "justified ends may only be pursued by justified means"2. At the core of Walzer's just war theory rests the legalist paradigm. The legalist paradigm provides a basic of understanding of international law; Walzer recognises that there exists an international order of independent states.

  2. Crusades and Just War Theory

    It was based on the Holy Land of Palestine. The capital of Jerusalem was ruled by Muslims in AD 637 and by Turkish Muslims since 1071. The crusaders who had the support of the church wanted the land from the Muslims infidels.

  1. Examine the main premises behind Eisenhower's concept of containment

    The threat of tactical nuclear bombing was the US's bargaining chip in bringing about negotiating talks over Korea, at peace talks in India and at truce negotiations at Panmunjom, Ike later recalled "we dropped the word discreetly, of our intention.

  2. Discuss the subplot to the film "The Three Kings", comment and analyse on the ...

    The fact that they have alcohol with them is emblematic of their lack of consideration for other cultures, as alcohol is prohibited in Iraq. This point is also emphasised slightly later, when the American soldiers are disrobing the Iraqi prisoners.

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    undermine U.S. regional hegemony, 5) deter Israel from attacking, 6) counter the overall military buildup of other Arab states and the U.S. since 1991.[19] A main point of contention on the international scene however, has not been Iran?s conventional buildup, but their ?alleged? search for weapons of mass destruction.

  2. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    With the Japanese attack on the US fleet at Pearl Harbor on the 7th December 1941, and Hitler's Declaration of war against America, the US the Second World War alongside the UK and the Soviet Union which, as previously stated, Hitler's Germany attacked in the summer of 1941 in " Operation Barberossa".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work