• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Broke the Stalemate Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on the Western Front from December nineteen fourteen

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Broke the Stalemate? Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on the Western Front from December nineteen fourteen right through to nineteen eighteen. It appeared to everyone that the war could go on forever and it would be impossible to make a breakthrough on the Western Front, but then from nowhere a series of events followed that broke the stalemate. The question is which one of these events was the key to breaking the stalemate on the Western Front? In my opinion there isn't just one event that broke the stalemate and triggered a breakthrough, it was a collection of two events that wee equally influential. I think the events that broke the stalemate on the Western Front were the blockade of German ports and the Ludendorff Offensive. The Ludendorff Offensive was executed on the twenty first of July. It was a last ditch effort for the Germans to win the war, they figured out that it was an all or nothing gamble, that was worth taking considering the situation they were in. I think the situation they were in affected their decision as the Germany arm was short of supplies and back in Germany the people were starving so it was just a matter of ...read more.

Middle

German trade had decreased from $5.9 billion in nineteen fourteen to just $0.9 in nineteen seventeen. I think the other objective of the blockade to stop vital supplies to the German army on the front lines played an important part in the breaking of the stalemate as it meant that the Allied army always had an advantage as they could always get supplies from ports when ever they wanted, whereas Germany's supplies were restricted as they could only arrive by land from Germany and from other countries that didn't need to use the sea to deliver supplies. Although the other aspects all contributed to the stalemate being broken I believe that the most important purpose of the Blockade was to starve German civilians in to submission, as three hundred thousand deaths were related to malnutrition during 1914-18 among civilian population. Also the adults had a meat rationing equivalent to two burgers a week and at one point a third of all pigs had to be slaughtered. I think Germany found it very hard to win the war with everyone at home being starved, because morale and doubt would start to creep into the civilians minds and this made them not support the war effort and resent it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even though some new weapons like tanks were invented between 1917-18 they played minimal parts in the war and so weren't important. I think overall that the weapons were a reason for the $talemate on the western front so, I can't really see how they helped to break the stalemate on the western front, and I therefore think that they are the least important factor that broke the stalemate. In conclusion I think together the Ludendorff offensive and the Blockade of Germany were equally the most important things that contributed to breaking the stalemate on the western front. This is because they together forced Germany in to making rash decisions that they wouldn't of otherwise. Also they made Germany scared which made them as a nation weaker and thus easier to defeat. I think then that America joining the war helped the most next as without them the allies would have been short of soldiers after Russia's departure, which would have put the allies on the defensive. I think that the new technology and weapons were the least important things that helped to break the stalemate as they helped to cause the stalemate as they were so defensive in the way in which they could be used. A$hley Whitfield ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    surrounded by Britain and France and would be in a Better position to attack. So the Germans decided that they would head for the ports but this was held as important ground by the British as this is where they got there equipment and reinforcements so they had to beat the Germans there.

  2. Sclieffen Plan &There were 4 main reasons 'why the stalemate on the Western front ...

    Germany was starving and desperate to end the war. The blockading of German ports was important because Germany was weakened without supplies. The soldiers were running out of ammunition and the country was starving. Finally, the German offensive on March 1918 was Germany's last attempt at winning the war.

  1. why a stalemate grew on the western front

    An additional reason was the mobilisation of Russia's army. Schlieffen believed that Russia would take 6 weeks to mobilise for war, however it only took 10 days. Schlieffen had received false information about Russia's railway network and so miscalculated dramatically.

  2. It is debatable whether there was actually a complete breakthrough and whether the stalemate ...

    Also if the ports were blockaded enemy battleships and destroyers could not attack British and French ships or coastal towns. This meant that there could be no naval invasion of Britain. * The British achieved the blockade by laying mines across the entrance to the Baltic Sea (Sweden to Holland)

  1. Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front?

    The integral part of this plan was to be sure the 'hammer-swing' would move west of Paris and circle the city from the south. When Paris was trapped, the capital would fall and its rich mining and industrial areas would be under German control.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    brought the United States closer to a free-trade basis. Growing Sectional Conflicts President Polk's war with Mexico ripped open the slavery question again. Was it to be allowed in the new territories? The WILMOT PROVISO (1846), which would have excluded slavery, became a rallying point for both sides, being voted on again and again in Congress and successfully held off by southerners.

  1. The Western Front - the soldiers' experiences and official reports.

    Source 3, a poem published in a British newspaper is a typical example of wartime propaganda, which would have been used to endorse the stereotypical "evil" image of Germans. Entitled "The Great German Baby Killers", and written by J. Gilham it uses a patronising tone to describe "the wonderful Germans",

  2. Was the USA's entry into the war, the British blockade, Tanks and the German ...

    Throughout September 1918, Australian forces had helped the British army to secure positions from which an attack on the Hindenburg Line could be launched. Planning began for a major attack at the end of the month. It was hoped that this attack would finally break the power of the German army.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work