• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can you learn form Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel Nasser?

Extracts from this document...


1. Study Source A What can you learn form Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel Nasser? Sir Anthony Eden most certainly thought badly of Colonel Nasser. First of all the canal was "not vital to Egypt" in Eden's opinion. He thought Nasser was selfish and we know this because he says, "Nasser has seized it for his own ends". He also had to oppose Nasser if he truly thought that Britain's, "oil, machinery and much of our transport would grind to a halt". He wanted to expose all the reasons that might favour his idea to oppose Nasser and go to war. He also tries to make out that Nasser is inconsiderate by saying, "Nasser has taken over an international company without consultation and without our consent". Then Eden says, "Our quarrel is not with Egypt, it is with Colonel Nasser". Here he is giving an impression to the people of himself. This I think shows the British people that it is just a war against the colonel and not the people of Egypt. So it is different to the war that had recently ended which was the Second World War. When Eden says, "instead of meeting we with friendship colonel Nasser conducted a vicious propaganda campaign against this country", he is telling his people that he wanted a peaceful option to resolving the problem but Nasser made this impossible due to his campaign against them. Also by saying "vicious propaganda," it said that Nasser hated Britain but this cannot be backed up with anything. Finally he says, "This is how dictatorships behave, and we all remember the costs of giving into Hitler." Here he is saying that like in World War 2 appeasement was not the answer and so should not be used as a tactic in this case. At this time it could be presumed the British wanted peace, because of the recent events and their outcomes. ...read more.


First of all in Sir Anthony Eden's letter he says "I do not think that we disagree about our primary objective," but in Source H Mr Lloyd seems to believe that there is a misunderstanding in objectives. He says "there may have been mistaken judgements in carrying out our policies." Also in both sources the point I made just before this is proven because Eden and Lloyd have started two different primary objectives. Source G says the main aim is "to undo what Nasser has done and set up an international regime for the canal," whereas in Source H it says that the initial aim is "preventing a general outbreak of war in the Middle East." Eden's main objective which I have quoted above comes in Selwyn Lloyd's book too, but as the third objective. "The Suez canal had to be brought back under some kind of international control." Coincidently both men agreed that there was more than one objective. "but this is not all," is quoted from Sir Eden's letter and Source H gives three clear objectives. Many references of Hitler and his comparison to Nasser can be seen in both sources. For example Eden says that Nasser's route is "unpleasantly familiar", and also the word "menace", instantly reminds us of Hitler. In Source G Eden tries his best to make America and Britain sound united and as one country. He says he wants to, "set up an international regime for the canal, "and "a regime less hostile to the west." The phrase "international regime", and the words "the west", are used to help his thought that Eisenhower will support him if they make him feel closer to England. These words also make the letter sound more considerate towards world opinion and not selfish on Eden's behalf. On the other hand Lloyd says "national interest", which gives us a sense that Eden is thinking of personal advantages. ...read more.


This probably caused the public to think that Eden is not consulting them in any way, so as a result they went against him. The section where Mr. Lloyd says "Eden believed that his government had done what was right," is again a bad sign because if he had consulted his people on what should be done next then he would have done what was truly the right thing to do. The lack of consultation or listening is what I believe aggravated the public the most. The Suez Crisis demonstrated how much the United Nations was needed in the world. It was they who ordered the withdrawal of troops from the Suez area. I think the role which the USA and Dwight D Eisenhower took was very influential to the withdrawal of troops as well as the United Nations. The increase of oil prices and blockage of the canal caused America to apply pressure on Britain and France to stop the fighting. After the whole Suez saga, Britain is said to have dropped from its former status as a world super power. There relationship with other countries were changing for the worse and so this is why many people believe that Britain is not as influential in the world as it was 60 to 70 years ago. Finally I think that the comment "Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish," is partly true. I wouldn't say they were made to look foolish but were humiliated because they were obliged to back down by America and the United Nations. So they were humiliated to a certain extent because their decision was over ruled and so this can be fairly shameful. I don't think that the public helped with this but it was only deserved because of Eden's neglect to his people. Finally the majority of the people from other nations disagreed with Britain's actions and so yes, international opinion was against them which obviously did cause humiliation. Rob Abdur The Suez Crisis 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    were not very successful and were actually being attacked by the communists they were supposed to be eliminating. In 1968, the Viet Cong attacked and took over twelve US bases and the US embassy was attacked. This had a devastating effect on public support, because the whole attack had been broadcast on American television.

  2. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    Seeing as though he is a journalist, he does not have a particular motive except telling the truth. So this source can be trusted. This is due to the fact that he was a British journalist, and also the fact that America had banned all journalists in Hiroshima does make you wonder...why that was the case.

  1. Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action ...

    According to the American journalist Donald Neff the Suez Crisis was a "hinge point in history" as it discredited France and Britain as participators in the Cold War: it strained the Anglo-American alliance, intensified Egyptian nationalism and increased Soviet influences in the region.

  2. China's Relationship With The West

    When the Chinese government refused to give an official go-ahead to the Treaty of Tianjin, which had been signed in 1858, the hostiles resumed. In 1860, after British and French troops had occupied Beijing and burnt the Summer Palace, the Chinese agreed to ratify the treaty.

  1. How secure was the USSR’s control over E.Europe,1948-89?

    For example, Russia and the USA meet for a conference, and it's just after the arms race. Russia and the USA know exactly that they could destroy each other, so they have "preventive and cautionary talks", to try and keep the meeting calm. Profile of Lech Walesa * Born 1943.

  2. Discuss the subplot to the film "The Three Kings", comment and analyse on the ...

    The people of America would've believed that the Government, through the army, were doing an excellent job of helping to liberate Kuwait, when in actual fact, it is the Iraqis that needed liberating from the tyrannical regime of Saddam Hussein and his army.

  1. History Coursework 2003-Suez Crisis - What can you learn from Source A ...

    In Source A, Eden says Nasser is "not a man who can be trusted", and also "we all know this is how dictators behave and we all remember the cost of giving in to Hitler". This shows that Eden cannot help comparing his resignation over appeasement with the situation unfolding over Suez.

  2. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    is based on "some kind of intuition of what is right and cannot be demonstrated by rational argument."18 Carr suggests, instead, that rational necessarily demands a consciousness and the ability to adjust to the balance of power existing in international affairs, which serves as a constraint on the options available.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work