• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can you learn from Source A about women's work during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Source-based Coursework Oliver Arci 66633 1. What can you learn from Source A about women's work during the First World War? A woman who lived through the First World War writes Source A. The source tells of her discomfort while working in domestic service and the pittance that she was paid. The woman is pleased to see a chance of escape when the war brakes out and she is called to serve as a 'war-worker'; hand cutting shell fuses, which one would suppose takes place in a munitions factory. Although the source does not detail how her attitude to work changed, I can see that her hours have shortened and her pay has more than doubled. The source may be limited by giving the experience of just one woman but with over 900,000 women joining munitions factories during the first world war this type of experience may not be all that rare. 2. Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B? Explain your answer. Source C gives a very positive view of women working in factories. The author of the source emphasises how the women enjoy the independence and freedom of factory life. This may well be true given the fact that so many women had come from very strict homes where they worked as domestic servants. Source A fails to mention how life in the factory was but the author seems pleased to get away from domestic service. ...read more.

Middle

4. Use source G and your own knowledge to explain why some men opposed the employment of women in industry during the First World War. Source G was written by a woman in 1919, this suggests that the war would still be in recent memory and the source should be fairly trustworthy. The account describes some of the hostilities that were encountered in a male-dominated environment. The woman details instances where she would be given the wrong directions for a certain task so as to create hours more work for her, the woman had her drawer nailed shut by the men and oil poured over her belongings. These events were unfortunately all too common when women were introduced to chauvinistic attitudes in factories and many women found this hectic style of life too much for them and decided to return to their previous jobs as domestic servants. The reason for this work-place bullying was that many of the men were concerned over the fate of their employment, they may have felt threatened by the women invading the traditional male industries such as engineering and munitions, which at the time were considered to be skilled jobs and so workers were paid at a higher rate. With women joining these industries many could see the dilution of the workforce as a problem; the arrival of women diluted the industry, downgrading the skill level and also the rate of pay associated with it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Maintaining a healthy and prosperous country while trying to bring down the army of another is a major challenge for any country and would be made even harder if you were refused the support of your public. By getting deeply involved with the war effort, women showed that they do care about the welfare of their country and are willing to lend a hand when that welfare is threatened. With Britain losing a large percentage of its' population to fight on foreign battle fields the amount of able hands on the home front was drastically low. Women felt that it was their duty to help the struggling government event though it was that same system blocking their way to getting the vote, a move like this showed high tolerance of the situation they were in and also how the women dealt with priorities when they knew the importance of safety. In conclusion I would say that the work of women on the home front did help to swing the final outcome of the war in favour of the Brits. By deciding to join in with the war effort, women doubled the chances that Britain would have had without them; instead of being able to fuel the armed forces with all of the men Britain could provide, we would have had to split the army so that the cogs of society back on home turf would not have stopped turning. The arrival of the female 'war worker' we had a fully-functioning home front as well as an armed forces, both effective at the same time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    again links in with Haig's strategy to kill more Germans than the Germans killed his men. Lloyd George has changed his view from 1916, because by the end of the war 450,000 men died; most of them killed by machine guns when going over the top.

  2. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    It also states that the conventional bombs were more effective. This is proven by the fact that more people died in Tokyo than they did in Hiroshima. Another statement in this source that despises that use of the nuclear bomb is the 'no material assistance' - meaning there was clearly no point.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    Throughout the 1930s there had been widespread belief that bombing would be devastating. This belief was reinforced by the success of the German Condor Legion during the Spanish Civil War. In an air-raid in 1937 it had almost destroyed the Spanish city of Guernica.

  2. The Home Front 1914-1918, Women and work - source related study.

    The weaknesses of Sources A+ B is that they don't talk about what disadvantages or advantages in the home and social life came from working in a factory plus the sources mostly concentrate on time worked, wages and condition. However Source C doesn't give different views of woman and factory

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Loyalist forces retreated to Tripoli. Syrian artillery that had been bombarding the camps and the civilian population of Tripoli now focused all of its efforts on destroying the city. Anti Arafat forces also bombarded Tripoli and threatened to storm the city. The military pressures on Arafat were combined with intense Lebanese pressures to leave the

  2. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    One can also believe that Source B was exaggerated as it was written by a suffragette, who might of wanted to show the people of England that women were trying to help their country win the war even though they were treated badly and had to work under bad conditions.

  1. How useful are Sources D and E in helping you to understand the importance ...

    This is because most of the men are at war at the time. The ladies look annoyed while they are working because they know after they have put all this hard work and effort in they will only be sacked when the men get back.

  2. 'Without the work of women on the home front, Britain should not have won ...

    Sylvia Pankhurst also points out that it was common that '6 or more of the 30 dope painters were lying ill outside the workshop'. This shows that the women were put into poor working conditions to help win the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work