• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can you learn from Source A about women's work during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Source-based Coursework Oliver Arci 66633 1. What can you learn from Source A about women's work during the First World War? A woman who lived through the First World War writes Source A. The source tells of her discomfort while working in domestic service and the pittance that she was paid. The woman is pleased to see a chance of escape when the war brakes out and she is called to serve as a 'war-worker'; hand cutting shell fuses, which one would suppose takes place in a munitions factory. Although the source does not detail how her attitude to work changed, I can see that her hours have shortened and her pay has more than doubled. The source may be limited by giving the experience of just one woman but with over 900,000 women joining munitions factories during the first world war this type of experience may not be all that rare. 2. Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B? Explain your answer. Source C gives a very positive view of women working in factories. The author of the source emphasises how the women enjoy the independence and freedom of factory life. This may well be true given the fact that so many women had come from very strict homes where they worked as domestic servants. Source A fails to mention how life in the factory was but the author seems pleased to get away from domestic service. ...read more.

Middle

4. Use source G and your own knowledge to explain why some men opposed the employment of women in industry during the First World War. Source G was written by a woman in 1919, this suggests that the war would still be in recent memory and the source should be fairly trustworthy. The account describes some of the hostilities that were encountered in a male-dominated environment. The woman details instances where she would be given the wrong directions for a certain task so as to create hours more work for her, the woman had her drawer nailed shut by the men and oil poured over her belongings. These events were unfortunately all too common when women were introduced to chauvinistic attitudes in factories and many women found this hectic style of life too much for them and decided to return to their previous jobs as domestic servants. The reason for this work-place bullying was that many of the men were concerned over the fate of their employment, they may have felt threatened by the women invading the traditional male industries such as engineering and munitions, which at the time were considered to be skilled jobs and so workers were paid at a higher rate. With women joining these industries many could see the dilution of the workforce as a problem; the arrival of women diluted the industry, downgrading the skill level and also the rate of pay associated with it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Maintaining a healthy and prosperous country while trying to bring down the army of another is a major challenge for any country and would be made even harder if you were refused the support of your public. By getting deeply involved with the war effort, women showed that they do care about the welfare of their country and are willing to lend a hand when that welfare is threatened. With Britain losing a large percentage of its' population to fight on foreign battle fields the amount of able hands on the home front was drastically low. Women felt that it was their duty to help the struggling government event though it was that same system blocking their way to getting the vote, a move like this showed high tolerance of the situation they were in and also how the women dealt with priorities when they knew the importance of safety. In conclusion I would say that the work of women on the home front did help to swing the final outcome of the war in favour of the Brits. By deciding to join in with the war effort, women doubled the chances that Britain would have had without them; instead of being able to fuel the armed forces with all of the men Britain could provide, we would have had to split the army so that the cogs of society back on home turf would not have stopped turning. The arrival of the female 'war worker' we had a fully-functioning home front as well as an armed forces, both effective at the same time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    again links in with Haig's strategy to kill more Germans than the Germans killed his men. Lloyd George has changed his view from 1916, because by the end of the war 450,000 men died; most of them killed by machine guns when going over the top.

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    In December 1941 conscription of women aged nineteen to thirty was introduced. From then on the number of women steadily increased. By 1943 17,000,000 women aged between fourteen and sixty-four were either in the forces or in essential war work.

  1. Britain and the First World War - Women and the War Effort in Britain ...

    Source C says that the women has, "...ably proved that she can do her share in times of crisis" and Source A says that the processions women held was, "...so overwhelming a demonstration of its unconquerable and undivided spirit. The two picture sources, B and D entitled "Men and women

  2. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    Therefore, he could not fully express his ideas and feelings towards the whole situation, only parts that were for the USSR. 3) In source I Admiral William Leahy suggests that the use of nuclear weapons against Japan was wrong. To what extent do the sources support this interpretation?

  1. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    to find up to 6 of the 30 dope painters to be lying ill.' These two sources contradict each other as the one is saying that women is enjoying factory life, but you cannot enjoy factory life if you are constantly going to be ill according to Source B. 3.

  2. The First World War - Explain how the Schieffen Plan was mean to work.

    The Belgium resistance won them many friends and bought time for British and French troops to mobilise. The BEF, led by Sir John French, landed in France and met the advancing Germans at Mons on the 23rd of August. With only 100,000 men this small but well-trained and well-equipped force of professional soldiers gave the Germans a nasty shock.

  1. What can you learn form Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel ...

    I think the way he is sitting also shows how calm and relaxed he is even though Eden is about to shoot himself. Eden's body language shows quite a different feeling to the sailor. Not only does he have a gun to his head, his facial expression shows great anxiety

  2. Women at War: Source work

    dilution gained them added status, achieving the vote for women over thirty in 1918 and for all women over twenty one in 1928. The contents of the magazine, shown in the source show a lot about the purpose of the magazine.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work