• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What did the Compromise of 1850 offer to people who supported slavery? What did it offer to those who opposed it?

Extracts from this document...


Adam Ryan 6th period 11/8/02 U.S. History 1. What did the Compromise of 1850 offer to people who supported slavery? What did it offer to those who opposed it? During the mid 1800s, the possibility of the United States becoming two nations seemed to have become very real. Something had to be done to stop this from happening. Henry Clay, a U.S. senator, worked very hard to develop a compromise that would satisfy both the North and the South. Clay went to visit his past rival, Daniel Webster, who agreed to support Clay's compromise. On January 9, 1850, Clay presented the senate a series of resolutions, which later became known as the Compromise of 1850. Clay hoped that these resolutions would take care of the problems between the free and slave states dealing with slavery. The Compromise of 1850 offered things that were supposed to satisfy those who supported slavery and those who opposed it. ...read more.


Douglas took over from where Clay had left off. To ensure not to be defeated this time, Douglas reintroduced the resolutions one at a time, instead of all at once. He hoped that this would result in a majority vote for each resolution individually. The death of President Taylor helped Douglas's efforts. Millard Fillmore became the new President. Fillmore clearly supported the compromise. Calhoun's death also helped. Leaders in the South favored Clay's compromise. In 1850 the Compromise of 1850 was voted into law. 2. What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act designed to accomplish? What were some of the intended and unintended results of its passage? On January 23, 1984, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois proposed a bill to Congress that would divide the Nebraska territory in the North and the Kansas territory in the South. If this act were passed, it would repeal a provision of the Missouri Compromise, which had prohibited slavery in the territories north of 36� 30'. ...read more.


Even with all this, Seward doubted that he would be nominated. Abraham Lincoln, as opposed to Seward, seemed to be relatively unknown. This possibly helped Lincoln to win the nomination, since Lincoln had not had as many occasions to offend his fellow Republicans and Seward had. Delegates because of Seward's thoughts that the conflict between the North and South were irrepressible rejected Seward. Lincoln seemed more moderate in his views by the delegates. Lincoln had pledged to stop the further spread of slavery, at the same time, he also tried to convince the Southerners that a Republican administration would conflict with their slaves or with them about their slaves. However, his attempt to convince the southerners had failed. Southerners viewed Lincoln as a "black republican." Many southerners thought that his election would be "the greatest evil tat has ever befallen this country." Lincoln had won the election. Lincoln believed that slavery was a national problem. He was determined to be sure to stop the expansion of slavery. Lincoln thought that slavery was morally wrong, as he believed in racial equality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Why had Slavery become so Important to the Southern way of life, by 1860?

    The church can be claimed to be the most important institution for the Americanisation of the slaves; arguably in no other aspect of black cultural life, did the values and practices of the white so deeply penetrate. Even though slavery was very much a part of the Southern way of

  2. Missouri Compromise 1820.

    Still enraged, Northerners demanded the instant abolishment owed to the moral breach that slavery incompassed. They believed that slaves were being treated and stripped of there rights as a humane being. In American Slavery As It Is the author, Theodore Weld, describes his view on how it "really is" for

  1. To what extent do you agree with Abraham Lincoln that slavery was 'somehow the ...

    measures that would bring back the states that had seceded to the Union. 133 delegates attended on the other hand the confederate states however did not send any delegates. Three weeks of deliberation took places and it supported proposals like the ones that Crittenden had, however the Congress ignored them.

  2. The abolition of slavery 1833.

    Lots of black slaves who worked in Britain started to demand wages from their owners and to be treated like normal servants. Olaudah Equiana was a slave who in 1789 wrote his autobiography. When he was ten he was taken from his home in Africa and brought to Barbados as a slave.

  1. Free essay

    The Missouri Compromise. Since the bulk of the settlers in the territory of Missouri ...

    This period of transformation was known as the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution was during the time the cotton gin was invented. Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin to help making the picking of cotton easier (Jordan 248).

  2. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    the Tories in 1874 -if Benjamin Disraeli could appeal to one constituency or class of the electorate, he could almost as effectively make the same impact on nearly the entire sweep of the voters. (Mackintosh, 1962, pp. 162, 163) The way in which he succeeded in this is illustrated later.

  1. Abolishing slavery.

    He stated that the words were spoken, but no action was taken. He wrote: "This state of things afflicted, but did not dishearten me. I determined, at every hazard, to lift up the standard of emancipation in the eyes of the nation, within sight of Bunker Hill and in the birth place of liberty" (Ravitch 101-102).

  2. US History. How would you characterize the positions of the North at the time ...

    One of the major matters that the South yearned to be imposed from the Great Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Act. This was an act that "denied jury trials to accused runaway slaves and empowered any marshal pursuing the slaves to force local citizens to join the hunt" (Levine 393).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work