• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What did the Compromise of 1850 offer to people who supported slavery? What did it offer to those who opposed it?

Extracts from this document...


Adam Ryan 6th period 11/8/02 U.S. History 1. What did the Compromise of 1850 offer to people who supported slavery? What did it offer to those who opposed it? During the mid 1800s, the possibility of the United States becoming two nations seemed to have become very real. Something had to be done to stop this from happening. Henry Clay, a U.S. senator, worked very hard to develop a compromise that would satisfy both the North and the South. Clay went to visit his past rival, Daniel Webster, who agreed to support Clay's compromise. On January 9, 1850, Clay presented the senate a series of resolutions, which later became known as the Compromise of 1850. Clay hoped that these resolutions would take care of the problems between the free and slave states dealing with slavery. The Compromise of 1850 offered things that were supposed to satisfy those who supported slavery and those who opposed it. ...read more.


Douglas took over from where Clay had left off. To ensure not to be defeated this time, Douglas reintroduced the resolutions one at a time, instead of all at once. He hoped that this would result in a majority vote for each resolution individually. The death of President Taylor helped Douglas's efforts. Millard Fillmore became the new President. Fillmore clearly supported the compromise. Calhoun's death also helped. Leaders in the South favored Clay's compromise. In 1850 the Compromise of 1850 was voted into law. 2. What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act designed to accomplish? What were some of the intended and unintended results of its passage? On January 23, 1984, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois proposed a bill to Congress that would divide the Nebraska territory in the North and the Kansas territory in the South. If this act were passed, it would repeal a provision of the Missouri Compromise, which had prohibited slavery in the territories north of 36� 30'. ...read more.


Even with all this, Seward doubted that he would be nominated. Abraham Lincoln, as opposed to Seward, seemed to be relatively unknown. This possibly helped Lincoln to win the nomination, since Lincoln had not had as many occasions to offend his fellow Republicans and Seward had. Delegates because of Seward's thoughts that the conflict between the North and South were irrepressible rejected Seward. Lincoln seemed more moderate in his views by the delegates. Lincoln had pledged to stop the further spread of slavery, at the same time, he also tried to convince the Southerners that a Republican administration would conflict with their slaves or with them about their slaves. However, his attempt to convince the southerners had failed. Southerners viewed Lincoln as a "black republican." Many southerners thought that his election would be "the greatest evil tat has ever befallen this country." Lincoln had won the election. Lincoln believed that slavery was a national problem. He was determined to be sure to stop the expansion of slavery. Lincoln thought that slavery was morally wrong, as he believed in racial equality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. The abolition of slavery 1833.

    I believe that slave revolts were an important line of communication through which the voice of the slave moved the pens and tongues of the abolitionist. Seymour Drescher a historian believes slavery was abolished due to his explanation called econocide; slavery was also abolished because the money that was being

  2. US History. How would you characterize the positions of the North at the time ...

    Even more offensive to the North was Clay's proposition to toughen the Fugitive Slave Act by convincing the people in the North to aid in the extradition and incarceration of runaway slaves. However to understand the Great Compromise of 1850, one must look at the North's viewpoints beforehand.

  1. Free essay

    The Missouri Compromise. Since the bulk of the settlers in the territory of Missouri ...

    This period of transformation was known as the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution was during the time the cotton gin was invented. Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin to help making the picking of cotton easier (Jordan 248).

  2. US Popular Culture - Woody Guthrie Biography

    An estimated four hundred thousand made their way to California, which was the aim for most people " There's something going on out there in the Wes' and I'd like to learn what it is"- Casey in the Grapes of Wrath.

  1. Reasons for the Missouri Compromise

    Instead northern politicians worried more about the undue influence that the South already seemed to have in Washington, and that if there were more slave states there would be more southern congressmen and electoral votes in their favour. It was this political calculation rather than the moral outrage against slavery that played the key role in dividing north from south.

  2. Politics of 1850

    To date he is the only President from the state of Pennsylvania and the only president to remain a lifelong bachelor. 4. Founded in Ripon, Wisconsin, in 1854 by anti-slavery expansion activists and modernizers,[9] the Republican Party quickly surpassed the Whig Party

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    What this increased electorate did was to create "...a more uniform constituency, particularly in the larger towns and in the counties. Previously, the smaller number of voters had led to the predominance of local interests, political, personal or sectional, and matters that swayed one constituency frequently failed to affect many others.

  2. It is hard to pinpoint the exact beginnings of slavery in the United States. ...

    This is where the logic begins to break down, and the paradox becomes more apparent. Slaves were considered the property of their masters, as US citizens their rights were little above those of a dog. By being a slave, they were somehow exempt from the laws of the Constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work