• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics did both sides use in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...


What different tactics did both sides use in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968? The tactics used by both sides varied in many ways, mainly due to funding, equipment and morals. The Americans had to "go about" the war in a semi-civilised manner and follow the unwritten rules of war. This is much different from the Vietcong tactics which was what seemed to be a "Win by any means tactic," using Guerrilla tactics. The United States of America provided aid to the South Vietnam army. This was because that Kennedy wanted his people to think that he was tough on Communism, so he piled in "Advisors," money and troops into fight the Communist troops. The number of US troops was said to reach up to half a million. Furthermore the United States of America was said to have spent nearly $270 million on the Vietnam crisis. The United States also employed a "Strategic Hamlet" policy into Vietnam. ...read more.


The United States of America dropped more bombs in North Vietnam than all the bombs put together in the whole of world war two! The only problem with this, is that the bombing campaign had not taken any measurable effect on the was effort. One of the aims of the bombing campaign was to destroy the supply routes from North Vietnam to the Vietcong in the south. The only problem with this is that, once one route had been destroyed another was used. Furthermore and with all the supplies being supplied by foot or push bicycle, the couriers were quite flexible and did not stick to roads, or certain routes. The support from the North was great and a lot the population were involved in the war effort. The North Vietnamese Government used Guerrilla tactics against the Americans and South Vietnamese troops. These Guerrilla tactics were a much different way, and some say better way of fighting than the American's used. ...read more.


They often went out on search and destroy missions. To basically destroy any town they came across that they suspected to be Vietcong sympathisers. "Zippo" raids were often exercised, which involved soldiers setting fire to the straw roofs of homes with their Zippo lighters. The American's became extremely frustrated at the fact they were losing a war to a bunch of rebels in a country that was/is inferior financially and militarily. In Mylia, the American's resorted to perhaps one of the worst things to do in war; Massacre. The official report was that troops had killed 90 VC fighters although the reality was much different. Some reports have been released of 347 men, women and children killed and the women being raped first, other reports put the death count at over 500. The massacre of these people came out of frustration and the anxious feelings that they had to win. It happened at the same time, as the VC Tet offensive was raging. After all this we can see clearly that the Vietcong fought better and harder to win against all odds. The Americans withdrew in October 1972. Words = 1,079 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    go to war against Israel, the only thing they needed was an opportunity to do so. This opportunity came when the USSR misinformed Syria that it would be attacked in one week's time, for the first time ever, the Arabs seemed more than likely to defeat Israel.

  2. In what ways was the Pacific war a racist conflict?

    When Japan talked about unity, this got changed to mean conformity and fanatical unthinking thought. When Americans talked about freedom and individualism, the Japanese took this to show decadence and selfishness. The Japanese were labelled by the west of brutal, savage creatures, which would never surrender and would willingly lose their lives for their country.

  1. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    The tunnels also supported the Ho Chi Minh Trail, which was a network of 15,000 kilometres of roads and jungles used to transport supplies and artillery through neighbouring countries Cambodia and Laos, to Vietnam. Anti-aircraft guns were used by the Vietnamese to shoot down enemy planes.

  2. How does Ballard use the different nationalities within 'Empire of the Sun' to convey ...

    would be usually upset and more respectful towards the dead, regardless of their nationality. Jim's detachment from reality is once again demonstrated. Dr. Lockwood's party shows a strong contrast between the predominant nationalities within the novel. The British are indulging in extravagant parties, as a war is occurring.

  1. History of the United States

    In 1814, however, an invading army from Canada was repelled. Then, just as a peace treaty was being concluded in Ghent (Belgium), Andrew JACKSON crushed another invading British army as it sought to take New Orleans. The war thus ended on a triumphant note, and the republic was confirmed.

  2. Describe the tactics used by the U.S and the N.L.F in the Vietnam War. ...

    The war also had many psychological effects. The North Vietnamese used this as propaganda against the Americans, suggesting that they had done it deliberately to harm innocent people. But aside from this, the Americans were still struggling to have a clear view of the enemy. Because of this, they introduced another chemical bomb - Napalm.

  1. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    as they do an essential element in battle plans and the execution of military manoeuvres. Supply ships, horses, transportation vehicles - all are resources of as great an importance as the basics of food and weapons. In most cases, soldiers themselves are also a resource to be manipulated - it

  2. Did the TET offensive (1968) impact the conflict in Vietnam

    greater, and the trust within the government decreased as protests to end the war involvement increased.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work