• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does the author gain through the use of the first person narration from the outsider Richard Papen? Does it add credibility to the argument that 'The Secret History' is autobiographical?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What does the author gain through the use of the first person narration from the outsider Richard Papen? Does it add credibility to the argument that 'The Secret History' is autobiographical? The reader gains much from the story being told from Richard's point of view because we discover events, actions and reasoning as Richard does, this therefore draws the reader into the novel. We get to know the characters and the life at Hampton with Richard, giving us the same chances to know the characters as he has had. This makes us feel far more involved and as we know what Richard knows, it creates suspense as we recognise there is more to be revealed, due to the prologue. This is the most important and influential time in Richard's life and as we find out it has affected him irrevocably, ''This is the only story I will ever be able to tell." It is also argued that The secret History is autobiographical of Tartt's life, and certain elements seem to mirror her life. Richard's viewpoint and autobiographical style make the story about him and we don't discover much of the other character's pasts. We are told about Richard's past and discover much of his unhappy childhood, this is why we are attracted to this character and feel sympathy for him, his escape to an idilic place appeals to an element of us. Donna Tartt had in her view a bad childhood and has expressed this through the character of Richard, who is very matter of fact about his past and we the reader are shocked by the hatred he holds for his parents. "My father was mean, and our house ugly, and my mother didn't pay much attention to me,... no one at school seemed to like me that much." It is speculated that Tartt drew inspiration from her life in transporting Richard from Plano, California to the intrigue of Hampton. ...read more.

Middle

This personalisation gives the reader the idea of a private look into a dark world, and a confidential insight into these peoples lives, "Whenever I read about murders in the news I am struck by the dogged, almost touching assurance with which... fail to recognise the evil in themselves;" The title, "The Secret History" give the reader the idea from the start that this is a story that would have stayed buried if it wasn't for the book and is an interesting and intriguing insight into a private past. Having written intentionally in the first person narrative, Tartt achieves detective like characteristics in the novel. We see that Richard stumbles upon many clues during the early part of the novel and all these things don't really add up to anything, but it is soon clear that there was a different story continuing without the knowledge of the reader, when Henry explains to Richard, "You don't know how many times you almost stumbled upon us." Later on in the play when Charles is arrested for drunk driving, the reader also gets the sense that not everything is out in the open, as Henry is very secretive and makes Richard goes to the Police station. The reader soon finds out from Charles that there was far more interest from the FBI than the rest of the group knew, and that they were very close to being discovered. "The people from the FBI. There was a lot towards the end we didn't tell you. Henry made me swear not to tell." As the truth comes out toward the end of the novel, it is clear that things are starting to breakdown, especially the bond between the group. We find out much more about the twins incestuous relationship and about Francis's homosexuality. The closeness of the clique is clearly disintegrating, and they all know that there is no way to regain the relationship; the bacchanal and in particular, the murder of Bunny, has affected them all more subconsciously than any of them would have ever anticipated. ...read more.

Conclusion

Tartt was ill as a child and as a result of this she was often absent from school leaving her much time to read novels mirrored by Henry's similar actions at the beginning of the novel. Henry is also supposedly based on one of Tartt's close friends whom she met at Bennington College in Vermont, where Tartt began writing The Secret History, and is occasionally mentioned in the novel. At Bennington Tartt was part of a small clique of friends who were attached to one tutor in particular, who also taught Greek, similar to Camilla Tartt was the only girl in this clique. It is speculated that Henry is based on Paul Edward McGloin, who the book is also dedicated to, and who was a particularly close friend of Tartt's. Tartt is also reputed to have had similar characteristics to many of the characters, described as, "A well tailored, chain smoking, heavy drinking, insomniac," In many ways the novel mirrors Tartt's experience at college, and there are many elements that are said to be drawn from her own life. Not only is the novel an indirect autobiography of Tartt's life but it is written as that of Richard's. Drawing from her own experiences makes this novel feel far more vivid than if it was purely fictitious. Hence making it seem like Richard's autobiography inducing the reader to feel involved this also makes the reader believe in the characters and the plot are real. These two techniques combined make the novel work on many levels, as the feelings expressed by Richard have been felt by the author makes the piece seem far more realistic, also giving the reader an insight into the author subconsciously. Thus the involvement of the authors own life in the novel makes it more credible. This adds a sense of personal involvement in the novel; because it is written in part from Donna Tartt's personal experience it makes the novel seem far more grounded and real, making it far more believable and compelling, due to the reader considering it to be a true story. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    She appears aside from the others; therefore they can't hear her. She comments on the action and on Richard himself. Due to her lack of power, she may be able to understand the truth better. It is clever how this scene is actually written, as it seems that Margaret and

  2. War Story.

    He stopped, thinking about it. No, he thought, I must carry on. For James. He was getting closer to the point were he would actually have to fight with the enemy now. He was getting so frightened now. All around him, there were bodies scattered all over the floor.

  1. "What does the author gain and/or lose through the use of the first person ...

    first person narration as a way of masking her substandard abilities of characterisation, whilst James Wood in the London Review of Books found Richard a fascinating invention and colluded to the fact that he drew the reader into the action.

  2. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    (Roger Coke, A Detection of the Court and the State of England during the Last Four Reigns and Interregnum, 1694) Between 1660 and 1800, the Major Generals were decried as 'Turkish bashaws' and their militia troops as 'bands of janissaries' by commentators from across the ideological spectrum, including the royalists,

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    Young girls could leave service in England to go to Australia. In Australia the girls found that they were in demand both as servants and as wives. Many of them found it very easy to marry and improve their lot.

  2. If only they could talk

    Why is he a vet? And he finishes his book with these words: It is a pity that they cannot talk because it would be charming to have their views. There are a few things I would like to know.

  1. arctic story

    James' room always had an aura around it which gave it a more homely feel. I was really jealous of that boy. However the one thing he was not good at was sport, he sucked at sport. "James can we have breakfast now?"

  2. Examine how Ackroyd presents ideas of originality in the novel 'Chatterton'.

    This we read as being Chatterton and understand that it is a vision as an independent party in the form of the park attendant informs us that he just witnessed Charles talking to himself. These hallucinations are however a motif of Ackroyd's to emphasise the inter-connectivity of the novel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work