• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does the Soviet Experience provide with regard to the Institutionalisation of Ethnicity and Nationalism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What does the Soviet Experience provide with regard to the Institutionalisation of Ethnicity and Nationalism For a large part of the twentieth century many informed commentators regarded the Soviet Union as a highly stable country with little prospect of change and even less of domestic strife. That this had been achieved over seventy years; with a heterogeneous population of nearly 300 million people; over a hundred distinct nationalities; scores of languages and five alphabets, was truly remarkable. Had the Soviets managed to solve age-old national rivalries and antagonisms among peoples with very different religious backgrounds, traditional cultures, historical experiences and standards of living; and constructed a 'friendship of the peoples' through socialism? This facade of tranquillity was shattered by the reactionary coup in August 1991. On the eve of the signing of a new Union Treaty, the conservatives in the Kremlin tried to turn back the clock and, essentially, re-impose centralised party control over the USSR. This ill-advised and ill-conceived coup only succeeded in hastening the end of the Soviet Union and replacing it with the Commonwealth of Independent States. In 1917 the Bolsheviks inherited from the tsars a crumbling multiethnic empire stretching from the Baltic to the Pacific, and compromising over one hundred distinct nationalities and ethnic groups. The relationship of these non-Russian minorities presented the new regime with a major problem. ...read more.

Middle

As well as forcibly reoccupying the Baltic States, Russification and oppression of the 'fraternal and equal' republics began with a vengeance. All of Lenin's policies were reversed; cultural diversity was stamped out and the Russian language was promoted vigorously. The Russification of the Soviet Union reached its last. Stalin removed any doubt that the Russian people were pre-eminent in the USSR when, as part of the 1945 victory celebrations, he proposed..."a toast to our Soviet people, and in particular to the health of the Russian people.... the leading nation of all nations belonging to the Soviet Union, because in this war, the Russian people have earned the general recognition as the guiding force of the Soviet Union among all the other peoples of our country." (Smith: p.7) Like Lenin before him, Stalin was quite aware of the potency of the national problem. However, he relied upon a combination of terror and Great Russian chauvinism to keep the non-Russians subdued. In 1956, at the historic 20th Party Congress, the new General Secretary, Nikita Khrushchev, publicly rebuked Stalin and his practices. He exposed the mass deportation of non-Russian's and promised, selectively, to restore both their nationality contracts and their homelands. Regional economic councils were introduced, with substantial autonomous powers, in an effort to bring the living standards of all the republics into line. ...read more.

Conclusion

The aim of the Soviet State, at its inception, was to merge the diverse nations and ethnic groups into a homogenous economic and political unit, which would reflect the needs and wishes of the proletariat, rather than bourgeois national aspirations. Unfortunately, these aims acquired a distinctly Russian flavour and abrogated the equality and harmony required to achieve these goals. The fluctuations in the assimilative policies of the soviet leaders, from mild discouragement of ethnic affiliation to outright repression; suppressed ethnic identification but engendered long-term hostility. Furthermore, Gorbachev's policies of 'glasnost' 'perestroika' and democratisation, reduced the level of coercion in the system and allowed people to express their national and cultural aspirations, and air their grievances about their status. When these grievances were combined with the changing demographic trends in the Soviet Union, and the general economic malaise, national and ethnic chauvinism began to gather momentum and become reinforcing; as one ethnic group asserted its identity, so another would be spurred to action. Moscow's leaders struggled for decades to create a Soviet "nation," a "soviet way of life". In the end, they spawned a congeries of ethnic nations that repudiated "sovietism" the moment the Union collapsed. Ultimately, the soviet union had been conceived as an ideological state: a state in which class consciousness and solidarity were to be more important than national or ethnic affiliations, when this ideology proved flawed, and the power of the state finite, the raison d'etre of the Union collapsed and another institutionalised form for its expression had to be adopted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Those who had very little in the ways of land and machinery stood to gain the most from collectivisation as the poorest peasant would receive the same as the richest kulak in a collective farm. The kulaks were the better off farmers, either those that had prospered from generation to

  2. Impact of the Russian revolution - Ideology matters.

    Mussolini also founded and edited Utopia from November 1913 until December of the following year. This bi-monthly review attracted many of the most important young socialist and syndicalist theoreticians, who helped Mussolini to develop his own ideas. In the final years before the First World War, many independent national syndicalists, including Panunzio and Ottavio Dinale saw war as progressive.

  1. Russian Nationalism and the Soviet Revolution

    Kievan Rus' ultimately disintegrated as a state because of the armed struggles among members of the princely family that collectively possessed it. The Mongol invasion in the thirteenth century was the final blow to completing this Kievan disintegration. Following this disintegration, a number of states claimed to be the heirs

  2. Soviet State

    Rather than giving livestock to collective farms, peasants killed their animals. In five years, 46% of cattle, 46% of horses and 65% of sheep were lost. * Materials standards of living declined sharply in towns, but even more in the countryside so much so that Alec Nove wrote: "1933 was

  1. Would you agree with the view that conflict over Berlin in the period 1945-1990 ...

    The Allied occupation of Berlin was becoming an increasing embarrassment for Stalin who saw the solution as a unified Berlin under the control of the East. However this required the removal of the allies from West Berlin. Stalin knew he could not forcibly remove the Allies and recognised the strength of the USA with its nuclear capability.

  2. How EffectIVE Was Soviet Political Control In Eastern Europe In The 1950's & 1960's?

    As we know, there was successful political usage of Salami tactics to gain control, however other methods were also used, for example, the installation of the Cominform in 1947. This was used to tighten the Soviet control over East Europe, being set up to coordinate communist parties throughout Europe.

  1. Nazi living standards essay

    The wages were a lot better simply because the demand was higher in terms of bullets, guns and tanks than it was for consumer goods. The arms were worth more and more people were needed to make this equipment and therefore they needed to be lured to the jobs.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    3. 1933 was the worst year for living standards ? popular consumption was lower than in 1900 and consumption of meat was only a third of the 1928 figure. 1. Conditions improved from 1935, with 1937 being the best year for living standards.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work